Study of spatial abilities: The role of sex, female hormonal status and emotional context in visualizing 2D cross sections of 3D objects

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-05-08 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115520
Rimantė Gaižauskaitė, Ingrida Zelionkaitė, Ramunė Grikšienė
{"title":"Study of spatial abilities: The role of sex, female hormonal status and emotional context in visualizing 2D cross sections of 3D objects","authors":"Rimantė Gaižauskaitė,&nbsp;Ingrida Zelionkaitė,&nbsp;Ramunė Grikšienė","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our study aimed to elucidate the relationships between both biological and sociocultural factors on the ability to visualize cross sections, with a particular focus on sex and hormonal status, as well as emotional context and gender roles. While it is recognized that sex hormones play a role in shaping spatial abilities, the mechanisms remain unclear, and the effects of hormonal contraceptives, such as oral contraceptives (OCs) and intrauterine devices (IUDs), are largely unexplored. We recruited males (n = 35) and females across different menstrual cycle phases (early follicular (NCF, n = 34); mid-luteal (NCL, n = 36)) and contraceptive methods (users of OCs, n = 27; users of hormonal IUDs, n = 31). Participants’ ability to identify two-dimensional (2D) cross sections of three-dimensional (3D) solids was assessed using the Cross Section Task (CST). CST was performed after an emotion regulation task involving negative and highly negative pictures. Males outperformed NCF, NCL, and OC users, while IUD users showed comparable performance to males, suggesting a potential mitigating effect. Moreover, a multiple linear regression model for females showed that IUD users performed significantly better on the CST task than OC and NCL females, and marginally better than NCF females, after adjusting for age, emotional arousal, femininity, masculinity, and testosterone. Emotional arousal, especially following the emotion regulation task, associated with females' CST accuracy and partly mediated sex differences in the ability to visualize cross sections. Our findings advocate for further exploration of spatial performance advantages in IUD users, as the data suggest that hormonal IUD use may be related to the systemic changes in women’s bodies, including the brain, potentially influencing spatial abilities. Moreover, our results highlight the importance of considering emotional factors in understanding sex differences in spatial tasks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"485 ","pages":"Article 115520"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825001068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our study aimed to elucidate the relationships between both biological and sociocultural factors on the ability to visualize cross sections, with a particular focus on sex and hormonal status, as well as emotional context and gender roles. While it is recognized that sex hormones play a role in shaping spatial abilities, the mechanisms remain unclear, and the effects of hormonal contraceptives, such as oral contraceptives (OCs) and intrauterine devices (IUDs), are largely unexplored. We recruited males (n = 35) and females across different menstrual cycle phases (early follicular (NCF, n = 34); mid-luteal (NCL, n = 36)) and contraceptive methods (users of OCs, n = 27; users of hormonal IUDs, n = 31). Participants’ ability to identify two-dimensional (2D) cross sections of three-dimensional (3D) solids was assessed using the Cross Section Task (CST). CST was performed after an emotion regulation task involving negative and highly negative pictures. Males outperformed NCF, NCL, and OC users, while IUD users showed comparable performance to males, suggesting a potential mitigating effect. Moreover, a multiple linear regression model for females showed that IUD users performed significantly better on the CST task than OC and NCL females, and marginally better than NCF females, after adjusting for age, emotional arousal, femininity, masculinity, and testosterone. Emotional arousal, especially following the emotion regulation task, associated with females' CST accuracy and partly mediated sex differences in the ability to visualize cross sections. Our findings advocate for further exploration of spatial performance advantages in IUD users, as the data suggest that hormonal IUD use may be related to the systemic changes in women’s bodies, including the brain, potentially influencing spatial abilities. Moreover, our results highlight the importance of considering emotional factors in understanding sex differences in spatial tasks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间能力的研究:性别、女性荷尔蒙状态和情感背景在三维物体的二维横截面可视化中的作用
我们的研究旨在阐明生理因素和社会文化因素对横截面可视化能力的关系,特别关注性别和荷尔蒙状态,以及情感背景和性别角色。虽然人们认识到性激素在空间能力的形成中起着重要作用,但其机制尚不清楚,而激素避孕药的影响,如口服避孕药(OCs)和宫内节育器(iud),在很大程度上还未被探索。我们招募了不同月经周期阶段的男性(n = 35)和女性(卵泡早期(NCF, n = 34);黄体中期(NCL, n = 36))和避孕方法(口服避孕药使用者,n = 27;激素宫内节育器使用者( = 31)。使用横截面任务(CST)评估参与者识别三维(3D)实体的二维(2D)横截面的能力。CST是在涉及消极和高度消极图片的情绪调节任务后进行的。男性的表现优于NCF、NCL和OC使用者,而宫内节育器使用者的表现与男性相当,表明可能有缓解作用。此外,一个针对女性的多元线性回归模型显示,在调整了年龄、情绪唤醒、女性气质、男性气质和睾丸激素后,宫内节育器使用者在CST任务上的表现显著优于OC和NCL女性,略微优于NCF女性。情绪唤醒,特别是在情绪调节任务之后,与女性CST准确性相关,并部分介导了视觉横截面能力的性别差异。我们的研究结果支持进一步探索宫内节育器使用者的空间性能优势,因为数据表明激素宫内节育器的使用可能与女性身体的系统性变化有关,包括大脑,潜在地影响空间能力。此外,我们的研究结果强调了在理解空间任务的性别差异时考虑情感因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
期刊最新文献
Ketamine Metabolites Promote Anxiolysis and Hydrocortisone Stress Buffering in Zebrafish Contribution of orexinergic receptors within the ventral tegmental area in restraint stress-induced analgesia in the persistent inflammatory pain model Overcoming cognitive fixation through unconscious processing to enhance creativity Transcriptomic dissociation between synaptic plasticity suppression and structure-related maintenance signaling in the Alzheimer’s frontal cortex: A molecular analysis Gestational environmental enrichment shapes maternal motivational strategies in postpartum rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1