A. Belalia , A. Guesmia , M. Masenya , Z.M. Khumalo , M. Msimanga , M. Madhuku , C.B. Mtshali , M. Nkosi
{"title":"Electronic stopping force of 16O, 19F, 48Ti and 63Cu ions in molybdenum over a continuous energy range of 0.08–0.6 MeV/n","authors":"A. Belalia , A. Guesmia , M. Masenya , Z.M. Khumalo , M. Msimanga , M. Madhuku , C.B. Mtshali , M. Nkosi","doi":"10.1016/j.vacuum.2025.114210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this work, Time-of-Flight spectrometry was used to measure the electronic stopping force of <sup>16</sup>O, <sup>19</sup>F, <sup>48</sup>Ti and <sup>63</sup>Cu partially stripped heavy ions crossing Molybdenum over an energy range of (0.08–0.6) MeV/nucleon with errors less than 5 %. Theoretical predictions from the PASS code, SRIM-2013 simulation, Readjusted Bohr Model (RBM) that Guesmia et al. proposed, and the Convolution approximation for swift Particles (CasP) code including electrons capture, were compared with the measured values. While the RBM model, the PASS and CasP codes describe accurately the electronic stopping force in the region where the nuclear stopping force is negligible for <sup>48</sup>Ti and <sup>63</sup>Cu ions, it turns out to deviate from the experimental data by about 10–25 % in the region where the nuclear stopping force becomes appreciable for the same ions. For <sup>16</sup>O and <sup>19</sup>F where the studied energy range is near the Bragg's peak, the RBM model and the PASS code describe accurately the electronic stopping force. Even though the SRIM simulation accurately describes the ions (<sup>48</sup>Ti, <sup>63</sup>Cu and <sup>16</sup>O), it turns out to deviate from the experimental data by about 10–18 % for <sup>19</sup>F.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23559,"journal":{"name":"Vacuum","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 114210"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vacuum","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042207X25002003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this work, Time-of-Flight spectrometry was used to measure the electronic stopping force of 16O, 19F, 48Ti and 63Cu partially stripped heavy ions crossing Molybdenum over an energy range of (0.08–0.6) MeV/nucleon with errors less than 5 %. Theoretical predictions from the PASS code, SRIM-2013 simulation, Readjusted Bohr Model (RBM) that Guesmia et al. proposed, and the Convolution approximation for swift Particles (CasP) code including electrons capture, were compared with the measured values. While the RBM model, the PASS and CasP codes describe accurately the electronic stopping force in the region where the nuclear stopping force is negligible for 48Ti and 63Cu ions, it turns out to deviate from the experimental data by about 10–25 % in the region where the nuclear stopping force becomes appreciable for the same ions. For 16O and 19F where the studied energy range is near the Bragg's peak, the RBM model and the PASS code describe accurately the electronic stopping force. Even though the SRIM simulation accurately describes the ions (48Ti, 63Cu and 16O), it turns out to deviate from the experimental data by about 10–18 % for 19F.
期刊介绍:
Vacuum is an international rapid publications journal with a focus on short communication. All papers are peer-reviewed, with the review process for short communication geared towards very fast turnaround times. The journal also published full research papers, thematic issues and selected papers from leading conferences.
A report in Vacuum should represent a major advance in an area that involves a controlled environment at pressures of one atmosphere or below.
The scope of the journal includes:
1. Vacuum; original developments in vacuum pumping and instrumentation, vacuum measurement, vacuum gas dynamics, gas-surface interactions, surface treatment for UHV applications and low outgassing, vacuum melting, sintering, and vacuum metrology. Technology and solutions for large-scale facilities (e.g., particle accelerators and fusion devices). New instrumentation ( e.g., detectors and electron microscopes).
2. Plasma science; advances in PVD, CVD, plasma-assisted CVD, ion sources, deposition processes and analysis.
3. Surface science; surface engineering, surface chemistry, surface analysis, crystal growth, ion-surface interactions and etching, nanometer-scale processing, surface modification.
4. Materials science; novel functional or structural materials. Metals, ceramics, and polymers. Experiments, simulations, and modelling for understanding structure-property relationships. Thin films and coatings. Nanostructures and ion implantation.