A meta-analysis of the correlation between self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance in online and blended learning environments

IF 10.5 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105279
Yingying Zhao , Yixun Li , Shuai Ma , Zhihong Xu , Bingsheng Zhang
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the correlation between self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance in online and blended learning environments","authors":"Yingying Zhao ,&nbsp;Yixun Li ,&nbsp;Shuai Ma ,&nbsp;Zhihong Xu ,&nbsp;Bingsheng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present meta-analysis examines the association between different self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies and academic performance in online and blended learning environments. A database search identified a total of 42 studies from 37 articles from 2011 to 2022, containing 115 effect sizes from 11,014 participants in K-12 and higher education. The overall effect size between SRL strategies and academic performance was .14. We did not detect any significant moderation effects except for educational level. To examine the differences in how SRL strategies are linked to academic performance, we compared the relationships between different SRL strategies with academic performance at two different levels: 16 specific SRL strategies (operational level) and four categories of SRL strategies (conceptual level). We found that, at the conceptual level, all four SRL strategies were significantly correlated with academic performance. On the operational level of SRL strategies, the results showed that rehearsal, organization, metacognitive strategy, time management, effort regulation, and general SRL strategies were effective strategies associated with academic performance. The present findings contribute to the future advancement of SRL research in online learning and guide the development of targeted SRL interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 105279"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525000478","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present meta-analysis examines the association between different self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies and academic performance in online and blended learning environments. A database search identified a total of 42 studies from 37 articles from 2011 to 2022, containing 115 effect sizes from 11,014 participants in K-12 and higher education. The overall effect size between SRL strategies and academic performance was .14. We did not detect any significant moderation effects except for educational level. To examine the differences in how SRL strategies are linked to academic performance, we compared the relationships between different SRL strategies with academic performance at two different levels: 16 specific SRL strategies (operational level) and four categories of SRL strategies (conceptual level). We found that, at the conceptual level, all four SRL strategies were significantly correlated with academic performance. On the operational level of SRL strategies, the results showed that rehearsal, organization, metacognitive strategy, time management, effort regulation, and general SRL strategies were effective strategies associated with academic performance. The present findings contribute to the future advancement of SRL research in online learning and guide the development of targeted SRL interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线和混合学习环境中自我调节学习策略与学习成绩相关性的元分析
本荟萃分析考察了在线和混合学习环境中不同的自我调节学习策略与学习成绩之间的关系。数据库检索从2011年到2022年的37篇文章中共发现了42项研究,包含来自11,014名K-12和高等教育参与者的115个效应值。自主学习策略对学业成绩的总体效应量为0.14。除了受教育程度外,我们没有发现任何显著的调节效应。为了研究自主学习策略与学习成绩之间的关系,我们在两个不同的层面上比较了不同自主学习策略与学习成绩之间的关系:16种特定的自主学习策略(操作层面)和4种自主学习策略(概念层面)。我们发现,在概念层面上,所有四种SRL策略都与学习成绩显著相关。在SRL策略的操作层面上,研究结果表明,排练、组织、元认知策略、时间管理、努力调节和一般SRL策略是与学业成绩相关的有效策略。本研究结果有助于在线学习中SRL研究的进一步发展,并指导针对性SRL干预措施的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Pixels and pedagogy: MISTT's insights into evolving teacher identities when technology comes to play Gaining tolerance of immigrants through simulating migratory experiences: Quasi-experimental evidence from secondary school classrooms Feedback practices with teacher dashboards in primary education: Exploring dashboard-prompted feedback across lesson phases Longitudinal relationships between student ethical considerations, behavioral intention, and perceived knowledge in artificial intelligence education A critical examination of blockchain in education: A hybrid bibliometric and content analysis of sociotechnical imaginaries and pedagogical marginality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1