Linking perceptions of ecological restoration projects’ impacts on ecosystem services and human well-being for achieving regional sustainability

IF 4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Applied Geography Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103570
Pei Xia , Huining Zheng , Tao Hu , Zihan Xu , Jian Peng
{"title":"Linking perceptions of ecological restoration projects’ impacts on ecosystem services and human well-being for achieving regional sustainability","authors":"Pei Xia ,&nbsp;Huining Zheng ,&nbsp;Tao Hu ,&nbsp;Zihan Xu ,&nbsp;Jian Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding how stakeholders’ perceptions of ecosystem service (ES) and human well-being (HWB) impacted by ecological restoration projects (ERPs) is crucial for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Howerver, few studies have explored how these impacts are perceived by stakeholders, particularly in terms of the link between ES and HWB from a human perception perspective. This study surveyed 203 residents of Dongting Lake area using a questionnaire that assessed 18 ESs and 9 HWBs to explore how personal characteristics influence perceptions of ERP impacts. It was found that the perception scores of 18 ES and 9 HWB were not less than 0, indicating that local respondents strongly recognized the positive role of ERPs in enhancing ESs and HWBs. Perception scores were negatively correlated with age but positively associated with education level and positive ERP impacts on individuals, while income level had no significant effect. Analysis of 18 ESs and 9 HWBs perceptions showed that 83.95% of relationships were significantly correlated, suggesting a comprehensive link between ESs and HWBs at the perceptual perspective. Future ERP policies should prioritize enhancing stakeholders’ perceived benefits of ERP impacts on both ESs and HWBs. This study highlighted the importance of linking perceptions of ERP impacts on ESs and HWBs to support stakeholders’ livelihoods and foster reginal sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 103570"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622825000657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how stakeholders’ perceptions of ecosystem service (ES) and human well-being (HWB) impacted by ecological restoration projects (ERPs) is crucial for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Howerver, few studies have explored how these impacts are perceived by stakeholders, particularly in terms of the link between ES and HWB from a human perception perspective. This study surveyed 203 residents of Dongting Lake area using a questionnaire that assessed 18 ESs and 9 HWBs to explore how personal characteristics influence perceptions of ERP impacts. It was found that the perception scores of 18 ES and 9 HWB were not less than 0, indicating that local respondents strongly recognized the positive role of ERPs in enhancing ESs and HWBs. Perception scores were negatively correlated with age but positively associated with education level and positive ERP impacts on individuals, while income level had no significant effect. Analysis of 18 ESs and 9 HWBs perceptions showed that 83.95% of relationships were significantly correlated, suggesting a comprehensive link between ESs and HWBs at the perceptual perspective. Future ERP policies should prioritize enhancing stakeholders’ perceived benefits of ERP impacts on both ESs and HWBs. This study highlighted the importance of linking perceptions of ERP impacts on ESs and HWBs to support stakeholders’ livelihoods and foster reginal sustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Geography
Applied Geography GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.
期刊最新文献
Linking perceptions of ecological restoration projects’ impacts on ecosystem services and human well-being for achieving regional sustainability Editorial Board Comparing methods for measuring park access and equity using US census microdata in metropolitan Miami Resilience reemerged in sustainable development goals: A perspective on easing COVID-19 restrictions in China Identifying concentrations of overlapping environmental & economic insecurity in Los Angeles County
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1