Alison Ritter , James Bell , John Strang , Nadine Ezard , Craig Rodgers , Vendula Belackova , Marianne Jauncey , Krista J. Siefried , Darren M. Roberts , Wim van den Brink , Nicholas Lintzeris , Adrian Dunlop , Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes , Carla Treloar
{"title":"Bridging the evidence and the politics: Implementation trial of supervised injectable opioid treatment (SIOT) in Australia","authors":"Alison Ritter , James Bell , John Strang , Nadine Ezard , Craig Rodgers , Vendula Belackova , Marianne Jauncey , Krista J. Siefried , Darren M. Roberts , Wim van den Brink , Nicholas Lintzeris , Adrian Dunlop , Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes , Carla Treloar","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Supervised Injectable Opioid Treatment (SIOT) targets people experiencing opioid dependence who have not benefited from existing treatments. In this population, SIOT has been demonstrated to be efficacious and effective, yet this modality of treatment has only been taken up in a few countries. In this commentary we describe the socio-political context and history to the recent establishment of an implementation trial of injectable hydromorphone in Sydney, Australia. These factors influenced choices about the trial design, including integration of SIOT within an existing opioid agonist treatment program, time-limited treatment, and an assessment of feasibility, acceptability, safety and cost. While all new drug policy initiatives occur within a specific socio-political and historical context, we hope this commentary provides reflections for other places considering the introduction of SIOT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104749"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925000489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Supervised Injectable Opioid Treatment (SIOT) targets people experiencing opioid dependence who have not benefited from existing treatments. In this population, SIOT has been demonstrated to be efficacious and effective, yet this modality of treatment has only been taken up in a few countries. In this commentary we describe the socio-political context and history to the recent establishment of an implementation trial of injectable hydromorphone in Sydney, Australia. These factors influenced choices about the trial design, including integration of SIOT within an existing opioid agonist treatment program, time-limited treatment, and an assessment of feasibility, acceptability, safety and cost. While all new drug policy initiatives occur within a specific socio-political and historical context, we hope this commentary provides reflections for other places considering the introduction of SIOT.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.