Bridging the evidence and the politics: Implementation trial of supervised injectable opioid treatment (SIOT) in Australia

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104749
Alison Ritter , James Bell , John Strang , Nadine Ezard , Craig Rodgers , Vendula Belackova , Marianne Jauncey , Krista J. Siefried , Darren M. Roberts , Wim van den Brink , Nicholas Lintzeris , Adrian Dunlop , Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes , Carla Treloar
{"title":"Bridging the evidence and the politics: Implementation trial of supervised injectable opioid treatment (SIOT) in Australia","authors":"Alison Ritter ,&nbsp;James Bell ,&nbsp;John Strang ,&nbsp;Nadine Ezard ,&nbsp;Craig Rodgers ,&nbsp;Vendula Belackova ,&nbsp;Marianne Jauncey ,&nbsp;Krista J. Siefried ,&nbsp;Darren M. Roberts ,&nbsp;Wim van den Brink ,&nbsp;Nicholas Lintzeris ,&nbsp;Adrian Dunlop ,&nbsp;Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes ,&nbsp;Carla Treloar","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Supervised Injectable Opioid Treatment (SIOT) targets people experiencing opioid dependence who have not benefited from existing treatments. In this population, SIOT has been demonstrated to be efficacious and effective, yet this modality of treatment has only been taken up in a few countries. In this commentary we describe the socio-political context and history to the recent establishment of an implementation trial of injectable hydromorphone in Sydney, Australia. These factors influenced choices about the trial design, including integration of SIOT within an existing opioid agonist treatment program, time-limited treatment, and an assessment of feasibility, acceptability, safety and cost. While all new drug policy initiatives occur within a specific socio-political and historical context, we hope this commentary provides reflections for other places considering the introduction of SIOT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104749"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925000489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supervised Injectable Opioid Treatment (SIOT) targets people experiencing opioid dependence who have not benefited from existing treatments. In this population, SIOT has been demonstrated to be efficacious and effective, yet this modality of treatment has only been taken up in a few countries. In this commentary we describe the socio-political context and history to the recent establishment of an implementation trial of injectable hydromorphone in Sydney, Australia. These factors influenced choices about the trial design, including integration of SIOT within an existing opioid agonist treatment program, time-limited treatment, and an assessment of feasibility, acceptability, safety and cost. While all new drug policy initiatives occur within a specific socio-political and historical context, we hope this commentary provides reflections for other places considering the introduction of SIOT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥合证据和政治:监督注射阿片类药物治疗(SIOT)在澳大利亚的实施试验
监督注射阿片类药物治疗(SIOT)针对那些没有从现有治疗中受益的阿片类药物依赖者。在这一人群中,SIOT已被证明是有效和有效的,但这种治疗方式仅在少数国家被采用。在这篇评论中,我们描述了最近在澳大利亚悉尼建立可注射氢吗啡酮实施试验的社会政治背景和历史。这些因素影响了对试验设计的选择,包括将SIOT纳入现有阿片类激动剂治疗方案、限时治疗以及可行性、可接受性、安全性和成本的评估。虽然所有新的毒品政策举措都是在特定的社会政治和历史背景下发生的,但我们希望这篇评论能为其他考虑引入SIOT的地方提供反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Associations between financial hardship and alcohol reduction attempts in the context of a cost-of-living crisis and alcohol tax reforms: a population study in Great Britain, 2023-25. Corrigendum to "Incidents with recreational nitrous oxide use before and after legislation: poisonings and police incidents in the Netherlands between 2020 and 2025" [International Journal of Drug Policy 149 (2026) 105170]. A decade of regulated Cannabis Social Clubs in Uruguay: five key developments and challenges ahead. When profit meets public health: private equity in methadone treatment. How are bars and nightclubs in Scotland using extensions in late-night alcohol trading hours? Venue observation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1