Investigating the Consistency of Negative BOLD Responses to Combinations of Visual, Auditory, and Somatosensory Stimuli and Their Modulation by the Level of Task Demand

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING Human Brain Mapping Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1002/hbm.70177
Wilf Nelson, Stephen D. Mayhew
{"title":"Investigating the Consistency of Negative BOLD Responses to Combinations of Visual, Auditory, and Somatosensory Stimuli and Their Modulation by the Level of Task Demand","authors":"Wilf Nelson,&nbsp;Stephen D. Mayhew","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Negative BOLD fMRI responses (NBR) occur commonly in sensory cortex and default mode network regions but remain poorly utilized as a marker of brain function due to an incomplete understanding. To better understand how NBR manifest across the brain, compare between different sensory stimuli and how they are modulated by changes in task demand, we recorded fMRI during trials of visual, auditory, or somatosensory stimulation, delivered either alone or in concurrent pairs. Twenty young-adult participants were cued to attend to a single modality and detect targets in each trial. We found that NBR were consistently induced in all non-task-relevant primary sensory cortices and default mode regions during all stimuli. NBR were observed within the stimulated modality, in the cortex ipsilateral to the stimulus; as well as cross-modal responses bilaterally within the cortex of an unstimulated sensory modality. The NBR regions showed high spatial overlap with the primary sensory positive BOLD response (PBR) of the stimulated modality. The NBR occurred in spatially comparable regions across different modality stimuli such that the peak voxel location and spatial extent were comparable between within and cross-modal NBRs. Some specific differences were seen, such as stronger magnitude sensorimotor NBR to somatosensory stimuli than to visual or auditory. No significant relationships were found between subjects' PBR and NBR magnitude, but significant linear correlations were observed between NBRs indicating that subjects with high magnitude NBR within one sensory modality also displayed high magnitude cross-modal NBR in a different modality. These findings suggest that cortical NBR are largely consistent between different sensory stimuli but also contain stimulus-specific variability in magnitude and spatial extent. Finally, positive BOLD responses were stronger to dual stimuli in all contralateral primary sensory regions, whilst NBR were slightly increased in specific regions of ipsilateral visual and sensorimotor cortex. This finding suggests a strong contribution to NBR from bottom-up stimulus input that was further modulated by attention during dual conditions and that NBR is driven by a combination of bottom-up and top-down influences whereby contributions to its generation arise from both feed-forward signals from subcortical or activated sensory regions and feedback mechanisms such as higher-level attentional control.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Negative BOLD fMRI responses (NBR) occur commonly in sensory cortex and default mode network regions but remain poorly utilized as a marker of brain function due to an incomplete understanding. To better understand how NBR manifest across the brain, compare between different sensory stimuli and how they are modulated by changes in task demand, we recorded fMRI during trials of visual, auditory, or somatosensory stimulation, delivered either alone or in concurrent pairs. Twenty young-adult participants were cued to attend to a single modality and detect targets in each trial. We found that NBR were consistently induced in all non-task-relevant primary sensory cortices and default mode regions during all stimuli. NBR were observed within the stimulated modality, in the cortex ipsilateral to the stimulus; as well as cross-modal responses bilaterally within the cortex of an unstimulated sensory modality. The NBR regions showed high spatial overlap with the primary sensory positive BOLD response (PBR) of the stimulated modality. The NBR occurred in spatially comparable regions across different modality stimuli such that the peak voxel location and spatial extent were comparable between within and cross-modal NBRs. Some specific differences were seen, such as stronger magnitude sensorimotor NBR to somatosensory stimuli than to visual or auditory. No significant relationships were found between subjects' PBR and NBR magnitude, but significant linear correlations were observed between NBRs indicating that subjects with high magnitude NBR within one sensory modality also displayed high magnitude cross-modal NBR in a different modality. These findings suggest that cortical NBR are largely consistent between different sensory stimuli but also contain stimulus-specific variability in magnitude and spatial extent. Finally, positive BOLD responses were stronger to dual stimuli in all contralateral primary sensory regions, whilst NBR were slightly increased in specific regions of ipsilateral visual and sensorimotor cortex. This finding suggests a strong contribution to NBR from bottom-up stimulus input that was further modulated by attention during dual conditions and that NBR is driven by a combination of bottom-up and top-down influences whereby contributions to its generation arise from both feed-forward signals from subcortical or activated sensory regions and feedback mechanisms such as higher-level attentional control.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
期刊最新文献
Rosette Spectroscopic Imaging for Whole-Brain Slab Metabolite Mapping at 7T: Acceleration Potential and Reproducibility Denoising Improves Cross-Scanner and Cross-Protocol Test–Retest Reproducibility of Diffusion Tensor and Kurtosis Imaging Investigating the Consistency of Negative BOLD Responses to Combinations of Visual, Auditory, and Somatosensory Stimuli and Their Modulation by the Level of Task Demand The Relations Among Anxiety, Movie-Watching, and in-Scanner Motion Catecholaminergic Modulation of Metacontrol Is Reflected in Aperiodic EEG Activity and Predicted by Baseline GABA+ and Glx Concentrations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1