Absolute quantification of the living skin microbiome overcomes relic-DNA bias and reveals specific patterns across volunteers.

IF 13.8 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Microbiome Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1186/s40168-025-02063-4
Deepan Thiruppathy, Oriane Moyne, Clarisse Marotz, Michael Williams, Perris Navarro, Livia Zaramela, Karsten Zengler
{"title":"Absolute quantification of the living skin microbiome overcomes relic-DNA bias and reveals specific patterns across volunteers.","authors":"Deepan Thiruppathy, Oriane Moyne, Clarisse Marotz, Michael Williams, Perris Navarro, Livia Zaramela, Karsten Zengler","doi":"10.1186/s40168-025-02063-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the first line of defense against external pathogens, the skin and its resident microbiota are responsible for protection and eubiosis. Innovations in DNA sequencing have significantly increased our knowledge of the skin microbiome. However, current characterizations do not discriminate between DNA from live cells and remnant DNA from dead organisms (relic DNA), resulting in a combined readout of all microorganisms that were and are currently present on the skin rather than the actual living population of the microbiome. Additionally, most methods lack the capability for absolute quantification of the microbial load on the skin, complicating the extrapolation of clinically relevant information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we integrated relic-DNA depletion with shotgun metagenomics and bacterial load determination to quantify live bacterial cell abundances across different skin sites. Though we discovered up to 90% of microbial DNA from the skin to be relic DNA, we saw no significant effect of this on the relative abundances of taxa determined by shotgun sequencing. Relic-DNA depletion prior to sequencing strengthened underlying patterns between microbiomes across volunteers and reduced intraindividual similarity. We determined the absolute abundance and the fraction of population alive for several common skin taxa across body sites and found taxa-specific differential abundance of live bacteria across regions to be different from estimates generated by total DNA (live + dead) sequencing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results reveal the significant bias relic DNA has on the quantification of low biomass samples like the skin. The reduced intraindividual similarity across samples following relic-DNA depletion highlights the bias introduced by traditional (total DNA) sequencing in diversity comparisons across samples. The divergent levels of cell viability measured across different skin sites, along with the inconsistencies in taxa differential abundance determined by total vs live cell DNA sequencing, suggest an important hypothesis for certain sites being susceptible to pathogen infection. Overall, our study demonstrates a characterization of the skin microbiome that overcomes relic-DNA bias to provide a baseline for live microbiota that will further improve mechanistic studies of infection, disease progression, and the design of therapies for the skin. Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":18447,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome","volume":"13 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":13.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-025-02063-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the first line of defense against external pathogens, the skin and its resident microbiota are responsible for protection and eubiosis. Innovations in DNA sequencing have significantly increased our knowledge of the skin microbiome. However, current characterizations do not discriminate between DNA from live cells and remnant DNA from dead organisms (relic DNA), resulting in a combined readout of all microorganisms that were and are currently present on the skin rather than the actual living population of the microbiome. Additionally, most methods lack the capability for absolute quantification of the microbial load on the skin, complicating the extrapolation of clinically relevant information.

Results: Here, we integrated relic-DNA depletion with shotgun metagenomics and bacterial load determination to quantify live bacterial cell abundances across different skin sites. Though we discovered up to 90% of microbial DNA from the skin to be relic DNA, we saw no significant effect of this on the relative abundances of taxa determined by shotgun sequencing. Relic-DNA depletion prior to sequencing strengthened underlying patterns between microbiomes across volunteers and reduced intraindividual similarity. We determined the absolute abundance and the fraction of population alive for several common skin taxa across body sites and found taxa-specific differential abundance of live bacteria across regions to be different from estimates generated by total DNA (live + dead) sequencing.

Conclusions: Our results reveal the significant bias relic DNA has on the quantification of low biomass samples like the skin. The reduced intraindividual similarity across samples following relic-DNA depletion highlights the bias introduced by traditional (total DNA) sequencing in diversity comparisons across samples. The divergent levels of cell viability measured across different skin sites, along with the inconsistencies in taxa differential abundance determined by total vs live cell DNA sequencing, suggest an important hypothesis for certain sites being susceptible to pathogen infection. Overall, our study demonstrates a characterization of the skin microbiome that overcomes relic-DNA bias to provide a baseline for live microbiota that will further improve mechanistic studies of infection, disease progression, and the design of therapies for the skin. Video Abstract.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiome
Microbiome MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
198
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbiome is a journal that focuses on studies of microbiomes in humans, animals, plants, and the environment. It covers both natural and manipulated microbiomes, such as those in agriculture. The journal is interested in research that uses meta-omics approaches or novel bioinformatics tools and emphasizes the community/host interaction and structure-function relationship within the microbiome. Studies that go beyond descriptive omics surveys and include experimental or theoretical approaches will be considered for publication. The journal also encourages research that establishes cause and effect relationships and supports proposed microbiome functions. However, studies of individual microbial isolates/species without exploring their impact on the host or the complex microbiome structures and functions will not be considered for publication. Microbiome is indexed in BIOSIS, Current Contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citations Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
Absolute quantification of the living skin microbiome overcomes relic-DNA bias and reveals specific patterns across volunteers. Microbial network inference for longitudinal microbiome studies with LUPINE. Virome landscape of wild rodents and shrews in Central China. Deciphering the coordinated roles of the host genome, duodenal mucosal genes, and microbiota in regulating complex traits in chickens. An in vitro model demonstrating homeostatic interactions between reconstructed human gingiva and a saliva-derived multispecies biofilm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1