Assessment of Unilateral Lower Limb Muscle Power: Are Unilateral Functional Tests Correlated with Nottingham Power Rig in Healthy Adults?

IF 1.6 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.129458
Andreas Bentzen, Stian Langgård Jørgensen, Louise Mortensen, Inger Mechlenburg, Frederik Foldager
{"title":"Assessment of Unilateral Lower Limb Muscle Power: Are Unilateral Functional Tests Correlated with Nottingham Power Rig in Healthy Adults?","authors":"Andreas Bentzen, Stian Langgård Jørgensen, Louise Mortensen, Inger Mechlenburg, Frederik Foldager","doi":"10.26603/001c.129458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muscle power is an important physical capability across all age groups and health statuses. Typically, assessing lower limb muscle power requires expensive and sophisticated equipment to ensure reliability and validity of power. Hence, there exists a clear need to identify a simple and effective functional performance test that can serve as a proxy for evaluating muscle power when equipment is unavailable. Thus, this study aimed to identify an easily administered, functional performance test to assess unilateral muscle power.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Correlations between maximal leg extensor power (LEP) were measured using the Nottingham Power Rig, and several functional tests (i) unilateral 5-repetition Sit-To-Stand (5STS), (ii) unilateral 30-second Sit-To-Stand (30STS), and (iii) unilateral Hop For Distance (HFD), as well as (iv) self-reported physical activity assessed by the Short Questionnaire to AsseS Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH). Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between LEP and the functional tests for both legs, as well as self-reported activity, among 52 healthy participants with a mean age of 31.1 years (ranging 19-49 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A negligible correlation was found between LEP and SQUASH score. Negligible correlations were found between LEP and unilateral 5STS, unilateral 30STS, and HFD on the dominant leg. Positive low correlations were found between LEP and Unilateral 30STS (r=0.43, p=<0.01) and HFD (r=0.44, p=<0.01) on the non-dominant leg, as well as an inverse low correlation between LEP and unilateral 5STS (-0.42, p=0.01) on the non-dominant leg.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All correlations produced were negligible to low, suggesting that the functional tests investigated in this study may not be indicative of lower limb muscle power.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3b.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 3","pages":"344-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.129458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Muscle power is an important physical capability across all age groups and health statuses. Typically, assessing lower limb muscle power requires expensive and sophisticated equipment to ensure reliability and validity of power. Hence, there exists a clear need to identify a simple and effective functional performance test that can serve as a proxy for evaluating muscle power when equipment is unavailable. Thus, this study aimed to identify an easily administered, functional performance test to assess unilateral muscle power.

Methods: Correlations between maximal leg extensor power (LEP) were measured using the Nottingham Power Rig, and several functional tests (i) unilateral 5-repetition Sit-To-Stand (5STS), (ii) unilateral 30-second Sit-To-Stand (30STS), and (iii) unilateral Hop For Distance (HFD), as well as (iv) self-reported physical activity assessed by the Short Questionnaire to AsseS Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH). Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between LEP and the functional tests for both legs, as well as self-reported activity, among 52 healthy participants with a mean age of 31.1 years (ranging 19-49 years).

Results: A negligible correlation was found between LEP and SQUASH score. Negligible correlations were found between LEP and unilateral 5STS, unilateral 30STS, and HFD on the dominant leg. Positive low correlations were found between LEP and Unilateral 30STS (r=0.43, p=<0.01) and HFD (r=0.44, p=<0.01) on the non-dominant leg, as well as an inverse low correlation between LEP and unilateral 5STS (-0.42, p=0.01) on the non-dominant leg.

Conclusion: All correlations produced were negligible to low, suggesting that the functional tests investigated in this study may not be indicative of lower limb muscle power.

Level of evidence: 3b.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing Shoulder Proprioceptive Sense of Force: Hand-Held Dynamometer Reliability and Comparison with Isokinetic Protocols. A Critical Review of Trunk and Hip Exercise Prescription: Applying Evidence for a Modern Approach. A Multimodal Chiropractic Approach to the Treatment and Management of Medial Elbow Injuries in Elite Javelin Throwers: A Case Series. An Evaluation of the Balance Error Scoring System in Female Soccer Players Following Soccer Heading: A Pilot Study. Assessment of Unilateral Lower Limb Muscle Power: Are Unilateral Functional Tests Correlated with Nottingham Power Rig in Healthy Adults?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1