International Consensus on Evidence Gaps and Research Opportunities in Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-03-18 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.036108
Laurie J Morrison, Elizabeth A Hunt, Brian Grunau, Thomas P Aufderheide, Clifton Callaway, Joseph E Tonna, Comilla Sasson, Audrey Blewer, Bryan F McNally, Demetris Yannopoulos, Jan Belohlavek, Jason Bartos, Alain Combes, Ahamed Idris, Raina M Merchant, Leith States, Emily Tinsley, Renee Wong, Scott T Youngquist, George Sopko, Karl B Kern
{"title":"International Consensus on Evidence Gaps and Research Opportunities in Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop.","authors":"Laurie J Morrison, Elizabeth A Hunt, Brian Grunau, Thomas P Aufderheide, Clifton Callaway, Joseph E Tonna, Comilla Sasson, Audrey Blewer, Bryan F McNally, Demetris Yannopoulos, Jan Belohlavek, Jason Bartos, Alain Combes, Ahamed Idris, Raina M Merchant, Leith States, Emily Tinsley, Renee Wong, Scott T Youngquist, George Sopko, Karl B Kern","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.036108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increased accessibility of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following the COVID-19 pandemic and the publication of the first randomized trial of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) prompted the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to sponsor a workshop on ECPR. Two more randomized trials have since been published in 2022 and 2023. Based on the combined findings and review of the evidence, an international panel of authors identified gaps in science, inequities in care and diversity in outcomes, and suggested research opportunities and next steps. The science pertaining to ECPR would benefit from the United States contributing uniform data to existing registries and sharing common data with the ELSO (Extracorporeal Life Support Organization) international registry to increase the sample size for observational research. In addition, well-designed efficacy trials, recruiting across different regions of care evaluating long-term follow-up, including patient reported outcomes, cost effectiveness, and equity measures, would contribute significantly to the body of science. Workshop participants defined the population of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest most likely to benefit from ECPR. ECPR-eligible patients include those aged 18 to 75 years functioning independently without comorbidity; before suffering a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and without any obvious cause of the cardiac arrest; presenting in a shockable rhythm and transported with mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation to an ECPR-capable institute within 30 minutes, which is recommended after 3 rounds of advanced life support treatment without return of spontaneous circulation. There are significant inequities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care that need to be addressed such that outcomes are optimized for each target region before implementing ECPR in a clinical or implementation trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e036108"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12132745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.036108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increased accessibility of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following the COVID-19 pandemic and the publication of the first randomized trial of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) prompted the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to sponsor a workshop on ECPR. Two more randomized trials have since been published in 2022 and 2023. Based on the combined findings and review of the evidence, an international panel of authors identified gaps in science, inequities in care and diversity in outcomes, and suggested research opportunities and next steps. The science pertaining to ECPR would benefit from the United States contributing uniform data to existing registries and sharing common data with the ELSO (Extracorporeal Life Support Organization) international registry to increase the sample size for observational research. In addition, well-designed efficacy trials, recruiting across different regions of care evaluating long-term follow-up, including patient reported outcomes, cost effectiveness, and equity measures, would contribute significantly to the body of science. Workshop participants defined the population of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest most likely to benefit from ECPR. ECPR-eligible patients include those aged 18 to 75 years functioning independently without comorbidity; before suffering a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and without any obvious cause of the cardiac arrest; presenting in a shockable rhythm and transported with mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation to an ECPR-capable institute within 30 minutes, which is recommended after 3 rounds of advanced life support treatment without return of spontaneous circulation. There are significant inequities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care that need to be addressed such that outcomes are optimized for each target region before implementing ECPR in a clinical or implementation trial.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于难治性院外心脏骤停体外心肺复苏的证据差距和研究机会的国际共识:来自国家心脏、肺和血液研究所研讨会的报告。
COVID-19大流行后体外膜氧合的可及性增加,以及体外心肺复苏(ECPR)的首个随机试验的发表,促使美国国家心肺血液研究所(National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute)赞助了一个关于ECPR的研讨会。此后,又有两项随机试验分别于2022年和2023年发表。根据综合发现和对证据的审查,一个国际作者小组确定了科学方面的差距、护理方面的不平等和结果的多样性,并提出了研究机会和下一步措施。美国向现有的登记机构提供统一的数据,并与ELSO(体外生命支持组织)国际登记机构共享共同数据,以增加观察性研究的样本量,这将使与ECPR有关的科学受益。此外,设计良好的疗效试验,在不同的护理区域招募,评估长期随访,包括患者报告的结果,成本效益和公平措施,将对科学主体做出重大贡献。研讨会参与者定义了院外心脏骤停患者最有可能受益于ECPR的人群。符合ecpr条件的患者包括18 - 75岁无合并症的独立功能患者;在目击院外心脏骤停之前,没有任何明显的心脏骤停原因;表现为震荡性心律,并在30分钟内机械心肺复苏转运至有ecpr能力的机构,建议在3轮高级生命支持治疗后无自然循环恢复。院外心脏骤停护理存在重大不平等,需要解决这一问题,以便在临床或实施试验中实施ECPR之前,针对每个目标区域优化结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
期刊最新文献
ADJUVANT Randomized Controlled Trial: Rationale and Design. Cerebrovascular Risk Factors for Body Mass Index, Diabetes, and Atherosclerosis in a Wisconsin Native American Population: A Cross-Sectional Observation Study. Cardioprotective Effects of Finerenone Associated With the Suppression of Myocardial Sodium Accumulation in Aldosterone/Salt-Loaded Rats. Comparison of the Association of Area-Based Deprivation Indices With Hypertension and Diabetes Control Outcomes. Health Equity Perspective on Data-Driven Treatment Decisions in Cardiovascular Care: Risk Assessments Versus Individualized Treatment Rules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1