Francisco J. Marco-Gracia , Ángel Luis González-Esteban
{"title":"Live fast, die young, leave a good-looking offspring: longevity and reproduction trade-offs in rural Spain (1536–1965)","authors":"Francisco J. Marco-Gracia , Ángel Luis González-Esteban","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>One of the most debated evolutionary theories is the trade-off between fertility and longevity. Specifically, women who experience more childbirths may have a shorter lifespan due to reduced opportunities for their bodies to recover from the associated costs. Previous studies have produced varied results, largely due to the challenge of distinguishing evolutionary factors from genetic and environmental influences in human societies. Since both longevity and fertility patterns tend to be inherited across generations, long-term historical longitudinal population samples are particularly valuable for exploring this trade-off, as they not only provide large population samples across different temporal contexts but also allow for the control of intergenerational transmission of behavior. In this study, we use a sample of 5097 women from rural Spain (based on parish records from 17 villages) who died between the sixteenth and twenty-first centuries to investigate whether a trade-off between fertility and longevity has existed. In all cases, we can control for the experiences of their parents. Our findings reveal a substantial negative impact of parity on women's longevity, as well as the adverse effect of having an early birth before fertility control was established. Additionally, we observed a significant negative effect of a prolonged reproductive cycle on natural fertility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"46 2","pages":"Article 106673"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513825000224","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One of the most debated evolutionary theories is the trade-off between fertility and longevity. Specifically, women who experience more childbirths may have a shorter lifespan due to reduced opportunities for their bodies to recover from the associated costs. Previous studies have produced varied results, largely due to the challenge of distinguishing evolutionary factors from genetic and environmental influences in human societies. Since both longevity and fertility patterns tend to be inherited across generations, long-term historical longitudinal population samples are particularly valuable for exploring this trade-off, as they not only provide large population samples across different temporal contexts but also allow for the control of intergenerational transmission of behavior. In this study, we use a sample of 5097 women from rural Spain (based on parish records from 17 villages) who died between the sixteenth and twenty-first centuries to investigate whether a trade-off between fertility and longevity has existed. In all cases, we can control for the experiences of their parents. Our findings reveal a substantial negative impact of parity on women's longevity, as well as the adverse effect of having an early birth before fertility control was established. Additionally, we observed a significant negative effect of a prolonged reproductive cycle on natural fertility.
期刊介绍:
Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.