{"title":"Does larger mean riskier? Investigating risk perception and product size preference in insect-based food","authors":"Zining Wang , Jaewoo Park","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the increasing interest in edible insects as a sustainable protein source, understanding the product attributes that influence consumer acceptance of these novel foods is essential. Recognizing the significant role of product size in shaping consumer behavior, the current research investigates how product size impacts consumer acceptance of insect-based foods. Through two online experiments, we find that, in comparison to traditional food products, consumers prefer smaller sizes of insect-based foods over larger ones. In addition, a moderation analysis indicates that this preference for smaller sizes in the context of insect-based foods is robust across varying levels of food neophobia. Furthermore, while participants perceive all six types of risk to be higher for insect-based foods compared to their traditional counterparts, this difference in size preference is primarily driven by an elevated perception of performance risk associated with purchasing insect-based foods. Our findings enhance the understanding of consumer behavior toward insect-based foods, emphasizing the importance of product size in mitigating perceived risks and promoting greater acceptance of novel food options.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105490"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000655","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Given the increasing interest in edible insects as a sustainable protein source, understanding the product attributes that influence consumer acceptance of these novel foods is essential. Recognizing the significant role of product size in shaping consumer behavior, the current research investigates how product size impacts consumer acceptance of insect-based foods. Through two online experiments, we find that, in comparison to traditional food products, consumers prefer smaller sizes of insect-based foods over larger ones. In addition, a moderation analysis indicates that this preference for smaller sizes in the context of insect-based foods is robust across varying levels of food neophobia. Furthermore, while participants perceive all six types of risk to be higher for insect-based foods compared to their traditional counterparts, this difference in size preference is primarily driven by an elevated perception of performance risk associated with purchasing insect-based foods. Our findings enhance the understanding of consumer behavior toward insect-based foods, emphasizing the importance of product size in mitigating perceived risks and promoting greater acceptance of novel food options.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.