Biomarkers of (poly)phenol intake: a systematic review.

IF 7.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Critical reviews in food science and nutrition Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1080/10408398.2025.2469770
Yong Li, Yifan Xu, Marilyn Nash, Qi Yue, Melis Sevim, Claudine Manach, Rachel Gibson, Ana Rodriguez-Mateos
{"title":"Biomarkers of (poly)phenol intake: a systematic review.","authors":"Yong Li, Yifan Xu, Marilyn Nash, Qi Yue, Melis Sevim, Claudine Manach, Rachel Gibson, Ana Rodriguez-Mateos","doi":"10.1080/10408398.2025.2469770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(Poly)phenols in plant-based foods contribute to the prevention of non-communicable diseases, yet defining their optimal intake remains challenging. Biomarkers provide a more objective alternative to self-reported dietary assessments, but their validation is essential. This review systematically summarizes and critically evaluates validated (poly)phenol biomarkers to inform future research. A systematic search of three databases identified studies published from 1995 to January 2025 that quantified (poly)phenol intake biomarkers in biofluids using validated analytical methods and provided evidence of specificity and dose-response. Biomarker validity was assessed based on plausibility/specificity, dose-response, time-response, robustness, reliability, stability, analytical performance, and reproducibility. Five multi-metabolite panels were identified across eight studies: genistein + daidzein or the sum of isoflavone aglycones and metabolites (isoflavone intake), hydroxytyrosol and its phase II metabolites (hydroxytyrosol intake), structurally related (-)-epicatechin metabolites (SREM) ((-)-epicatechin intake), and phase II metabolites of 5-(3',4'-dihydroxyphenyl)-γ-valerolactone (PgVLM) (flavan-3-ol intake). The most extensively validated biomarkers, SREM and PgVLM in 24-h urine, met five validation criteria. However, challenges remain, including limited specificity, short half-lives, inter-individual variability, and a lack of authentic chemical standards. Further research is needed to enhance biomarker validity for precise dietary intake assessment in epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10767,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in food science and nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in food science and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2025.2469770","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(Poly)phenols in plant-based foods contribute to the prevention of non-communicable diseases, yet defining their optimal intake remains challenging. Biomarkers provide a more objective alternative to self-reported dietary assessments, but their validation is essential. This review systematically summarizes and critically evaluates validated (poly)phenol biomarkers to inform future research. A systematic search of three databases identified studies published from 1995 to January 2025 that quantified (poly)phenol intake biomarkers in biofluids using validated analytical methods and provided evidence of specificity and dose-response. Biomarker validity was assessed based on plausibility/specificity, dose-response, time-response, robustness, reliability, stability, analytical performance, and reproducibility. Five multi-metabolite panels were identified across eight studies: genistein + daidzein or the sum of isoflavone aglycones and metabolites (isoflavone intake), hydroxytyrosol and its phase II metabolites (hydroxytyrosol intake), structurally related (-)-epicatechin metabolites (SREM) ((-)-epicatechin intake), and phase II metabolites of 5-(3',4'-dihydroxyphenyl)-γ-valerolactone (PgVLM) (flavan-3-ol intake). The most extensively validated biomarkers, SREM and PgVLM in 24-h urine, met five validation criteria. However, challenges remain, including limited specificity, short half-lives, inter-individual variability, and a lack of authentic chemical standards. Further research is needed to enhance biomarker validity for precise dietary intake assessment in epidemiological studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
600
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition serves as an authoritative outlet for critical perspectives on contemporary technology, food science, and human nutrition. With a specific focus on issues of national significance, particularly for food scientists, nutritionists, and health professionals, the journal delves into nutrition, functional foods, food safety, and food science and technology. Research areas span diverse topics such as diet and disease, antioxidants, allergenicity, microbiological concerns, flavor chemistry, nutrient roles and bioavailability, pesticides, toxic chemicals and regulation, risk assessment, food safety, and emerging food products, ingredients, and technologies.
期刊最新文献
Advances of Vis/NIRS and imaging techniques assisted by AI for tea processing. Biomarkers of (poly)phenol intake: a systematic review. Exploring seed-based upcycled oils: types, extraction processes, and emerging applications. Key roles of milk-derived extracellular vesicles in intestinal tract, with special emphasis on microRNAs in extracellular vesicles. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of anthocyanins in Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a systematic review of in vivo studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1