Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Home vs Non-home Medical Care Physicians in Japan

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105536
Toru Yamada MD, PhD , Takuma Kimura MD, PhD , Takahiro Shinohara MD , Shuji Ouchi MD , Suguru Mabuchi MD, PhD , Takeshi Ishida MD , Masayoshi Hashimoto MD, PhD
{"title":"Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Home vs Non-home Medical Care Physicians in Japan","authors":"Toru Yamada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takuma Kimura MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takahiro Shinohara MD ,&nbsp;Shuji Ouchi MD ,&nbsp;Suguru Mabuchi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takeshi Ishida MD ,&nbsp;Masayoshi Hashimoto MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To compare the use of point-of-care ultrasound between physicians providing home medical care and other physicians in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional comparative study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>The participants were members of 3 societies related to home medical care in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A web-based survey was conducted between April and June 2024 to assess use of point-of-care ultrasound, physicians’ training history and needs in this technique, ultrasound machine availability and types, and barriers and facilitators for wider adoption.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 692 physicians (461 providing home medical care) participated. There were more point-of-care ultrasound users among those providing home medical care (75.9% vs 67.1%; <em>P</em> = .014). There was no significant difference in training history (34.3% vs 36.4%; <em>P</em> = .587), but training needs were significantly greater among home medical care providers (80.9% vs 66.7%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). This group also had better access to ultrasound machines (53.6% vs 35.5%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), with higher personal ownership rates and handheld device usage (29.1% vs 4.8%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001; 59.7% vs 13.2%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The main barrier was insufficient training opportunities, especially for home care providers (61.6% vs 51.5%; <em>P</em> = .011), followed by inadequate training environments (46.4% vs 32.9%; <em>P</em> = .001), challenges in image acquisition (59.0% vs 37.2%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and interpretation skills (51.4% vs 32.9%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Facilitators included improved access to ultrasound machines and increased training opportunities and available mentors, with home care providers significantly emphasizing training opportunities (71.2% vs 62.3%; <em>P</em> = .019).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>Home medical care providers were more likely to use point-of-care ultrasound and have better access to machines; however, they faced barriers related to skills and training opportunities. As handheld devices become prevalent, systematic training in this technique is becoming essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 5","pages":"Article 105536"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025000532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the use of point-of-care ultrasound between physicians providing home medical care and other physicians in Japan.

Design

A cross-sectional comparative study.

Setting and Participants

The participants were members of 3 societies related to home medical care in Japan.

Method

A web-based survey was conducted between April and June 2024 to assess use of point-of-care ultrasound, physicians’ training history and needs in this technique, ultrasound machine availability and types, and barriers and facilitators for wider adoption.

Results

Overall, 692 physicians (461 providing home medical care) participated. There were more point-of-care ultrasound users among those providing home medical care (75.9% vs 67.1%; P = .014). There was no significant difference in training history (34.3% vs 36.4%; P = .587), but training needs were significantly greater among home medical care providers (80.9% vs 66.7%; P < .001). This group also had better access to ultrasound machines (53.6% vs 35.5%; P < .001), with higher personal ownership rates and handheld device usage (29.1% vs 4.8%, P < .001; 59.7% vs 13.2%, P < .001). The main barrier was insufficient training opportunities, especially for home care providers (61.6% vs 51.5%; P = .011), followed by inadequate training environments (46.4% vs 32.9%; P = .001), challenges in image acquisition (59.0% vs 37.2%; P < .001), and interpretation skills (51.4% vs 32.9%; P < .001). Facilitators included improved access to ultrasound machines and increased training opportunities and available mentors, with home care providers significantly emphasizing training opportunities (71.2% vs 62.3%; P = .019).

Conclusions and Implications

Home medical care providers were more likely to use point-of-care ultrasound and have better access to machines; however, they faced barriers related to skills and training opportunities. As handheld devices become prevalent, systematic training in this technique is becoming essential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Consumer-Directed Personal Care in the New York Metropolitan Area: Trends in Use From 2017 to 2022 Association of Racial and Ethnic Composition with Staff Levels in Nursing Homes: 2013-2019 Intervention Response of Muscle Architecture and Composition Markers Assessed via Ultrasound Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Home vs Non-home Medical Care Physicians in Japan Expanding PACE Benefits/Services to Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities and More.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1