Resolution of Pain at Night and Improved Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251322749
Evan T Zheng, Koya Osada, Jillian L Mazzocca, Natalie A Lowenstein, Jamie E Collins, Elizabeth G Matzkin
{"title":"Resolution of Pain at Night and Improved Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy.","authors":"Evan T Zheng, Koya Osada, Jillian L Mazzocca, Natalie A Lowenstein, Jamie E Collins, Elizabeth G Matzkin","doi":"10.1177/23259671251322749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is performed for symptomatic meniscal tears that fail conservative treatment. Patients often report pain at night, although little research has been done to evaluate corresponding outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To (1) evaluate patients with and without preoperative nighttime pain who underwent APM and (2) assess postoperative resolution of symptoms and associated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing primary APM with or without chondroplasty at a tertiary academic center were prospectively enrolled in a database. Patient characteristics and PROMs were obtained pre- and postoperatively up to 2 years-including the visual analog pain scale, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Marx Scale, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) physical and mental components. Patients were included if they had a minimum 3-month PROMs follow-up. Pain at night was defined as reporting greater than mild pain on KOOS P7. Intraoperatively, cartilage was assessed using the Outerbridge Classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 587 patients were included, with 299 (50.9%) reporting preoperative pain at night, which corresponded with worse baseline PROMs. These patients were older and more likely to be women and smokers. No significant difference was observed in Outerbridge grade between patients with and without preoperative pain at night. Postoperatively, nighttime pain resolved by 2 years in 274 (91.6%) patients, 219 of whom (79.9%) reported improvement by 3 months. Patients whose pain at night persisted had a longer duration of symptoms preoperatively, higher body mass index, and a lack of baseline mechanical symptoms. PROMs significantly improved for patients with and without preoperative pain at night, although patients with baseline pain had worse scores compared with those without preoperative nighttime pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over half of patients undergoing APM reported preoperative pain at night, which was associated with worse baseline functional scores. Postoperatively, >90% of patients with baseline pain at night noted resolution of symptoms by 2 years, with nearly 80% showing improvement by 3 months. Functional scores improved after surgery for patients with and without initial pain at night, remaining lower for patients who had preoperative nighttime pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 3","pages":"23259671251322749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251322749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is performed for symptomatic meniscal tears that fail conservative treatment. Patients often report pain at night, although little research has been done to evaluate corresponding outcomes.

Purpose: To (1) evaluate patients with and without preoperative nighttime pain who underwent APM and (2) assess postoperative resolution of symptoms and associated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing primary APM with or without chondroplasty at a tertiary academic center were prospectively enrolled in a database. Patient characteristics and PROMs were obtained pre- and postoperatively up to 2 years-including the visual analog pain scale, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Marx Scale, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) physical and mental components. Patients were included if they had a minimum 3-month PROMs follow-up. Pain at night was defined as reporting greater than mild pain on KOOS P7. Intraoperatively, cartilage was assessed using the Outerbridge Classification.

Results: A total of 587 patients were included, with 299 (50.9%) reporting preoperative pain at night, which corresponded with worse baseline PROMs. These patients were older and more likely to be women and smokers. No significant difference was observed in Outerbridge grade between patients with and without preoperative pain at night. Postoperatively, nighttime pain resolved by 2 years in 274 (91.6%) patients, 219 of whom (79.9%) reported improvement by 3 months. Patients whose pain at night persisted had a longer duration of symptoms preoperatively, higher body mass index, and a lack of baseline mechanical symptoms. PROMs significantly improved for patients with and without preoperative pain at night, although patients with baseline pain had worse scores compared with those without preoperative nighttime pain.

Conclusion: Over half of patients undergoing APM reported preoperative pain at night, which was associated with worse baseline functional scores. Postoperatively, >90% of patients with baseline pain at night noted resolution of symptoms by 2 years, with nearly 80% showing improvement by 3 months. Functional scores improved after surgery for patients with and without initial pain at night, remaining lower for patients who had preoperative nighttime pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关节镜半月板部分切除术后夜间疼痛的缓解和功能预后的改善。
背景:关节镜下半月板部分切除术(APM)用于治疗保守治疗失败的症状性半月板撕裂。患者经常报告夜间疼痛,尽管很少有研究评估相应的结果。目的:(1)评估术前有和无夜间疼痛的APM患者,(2)评估术后症状的缓解和相关的患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。研究设计:病例系列;证据等级,4级。方法:在三级学术中心接受原发性APM伴或不伴软骨成形术的连续患者被前瞻性地纳入数据库。在术前和术后2年内获得患者特征和PROMs,包括视觉模拟疼痛量表、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)、马克思量表和退伍军人RAND 12项健康调查(VR-12)身体和精神成分。如果患者进行了至少3个月的PROMs随访,则纳入其中。在KOOS P7中,夜间疼痛被定义为报告大于轻度疼痛。术中,使用Outerbridge分级对软骨进行评估。结果:共纳入587例患者,299例(50.9%)报告术前夜间疼痛,与较差的基线PROMs相对应。这些患者年龄较大,更有可能是女性和吸烟者。术前夜间疼痛和无夜间疼痛患者的Outerbridge分级无显著差异。术后,274例(91.6%)患者的夜间疼痛缓解了2年,其中219例(79.9%)患者的夜间疼痛缓解了3个月。夜间疼痛持续的患者术前症状持续时间较长,体重指数较高,缺乏基线机械症状。术前和无夜间疼痛患者的PROMs均有显著改善,尽管基线疼痛患者的评分较术前无夜间疼痛患者差。结论:超过一半的APM患者报告术前夜间疼痛,这与较差的基线功能评分相关。术后,基线夜间疼痛的患者中有90%在2年内症状缓解,近80%在3个月内症状改善。术后有夜间疼痛和无夜间疼痛的患者功能评分均有改善,术前有夜间疼痛的患者功能评分仍较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Addition of Autograft Lateral Extra-Articular Procedures to Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Psychological Readiness in Elite Versus Nonelite Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference Thresholds for Pediatric Knee Surgeries. Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage Versus Bankart Repair With Remplissage and Arthroscopic Subscapularis Augmentation in Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability. No Postoperative Difference Between Bone-Block Versus All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1