{"title":"AI anxiety and knowledge payment: the roles of perceived value and self-efficacy.","authors":"Jinsong Chen, Miao He, Jinhua Sun","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02510-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into daily life raises significant challenges and uncertainties, notably concerning job security and skill relevance. This has led to the emergence of 'AI anxiety'-a stress response to potential impacts of AI on individuals' futures. This study examines AI anxiety's effects on individuals' willingness to pay for knowledge, focusing on the roles of perceived value and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study consisted of two experiments. Study 1 utilized a one-factor between-subjects design (AI anxiety vs. neutral emotion) with 297 participants to examine the mediating role of perceived value in the relationship between AI anxiety and willingness to pay for knowledge. Study 2 employed a 2 × 2 between-subjects design (AI anxiety vs. neutral emotion )×self-efficacy (high vs. low) with 506 participants to investigate the moderating effect of self-efficacy on this relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study 1 showed that AI anxiety significantly increases the willingness to pay for knowledge, with perceived value partially mediating this effect. Study 2 demonstrated that self-efficacy moderates the influence of AI anxiety: higher self-efficacy levels weaken, whereas lower levels strengthen, the willingness to pay for knowledge. Furthermore, self-efficacy also negatively moderates the effect of AI anxiety on perceived value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI anxiety positively influences payment for knowledge, with critical roles for perceived value and self-efficacy. These findings offer a new framework for understanding AI anxiety's impact on consumer behavior and provide actionable insights for platforms and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02510-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into daily life raises significant challenges and uncertainties, notably concerning job security and skill relevance. This has led to the emergence of 'AI anxiety'-a stress response to potential impacts of AI on individuals' futures. This study examines AI anxiety's effects on individuals' willingness to pay for knowledge, focusing on the roles of perceived value and self-efficacy.
Methods: This study consisted of two experiments. Study 1 utilized a one-factor between-subjects design (AI anxiety vs. neutral emotion) with 297 participants to examine the mediating role of perceived value in the relationship between AI anxiety and willingness to pay for knowledge. Study 2 employed a 2 × 2 between-subjects design (AI anxiety vs. neutral emotion )×self-efficacy (high vs. low) with 506 participants to investigate the moderating effect of self-efficacy on this relationship.
Results: Study 1 showed that AI anxiety significantly increases the willingness to pay for knowledge, with perceived value partially mediating this effect. Study 2 demonstrated that self-efficacy moderates the influence of AI anxiety: higher self-efficacy levels weaken, whereas lower levels strengthen, the willingness to pay for knowledge. Furthermore, self-efficacy also negatively moderates the effect of AI anxiety on perceived value.
Conclusions: AI anxiety positively influences payment for knowledge, with critical roles for perceived value and self-efficacy. These findings offer a new framework for understanding AI anxiety's impact on consumer behavior and provide actionable insights for platforms and policymakers.
期刊介绍:
BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.