AI anxiety and knowledge payment: the roles of perceived value and self-efficacy.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02510-9
Jinsong Chen, Miao He, Jinhua Sun
{"title":"AI anxiety and knowledge payment: the roles of perceived value and self-efficacy.","authors":"Jinsong Chen, Miao He, Jinhua Sun","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02510-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into daily life raises significant challenges and uncertainties, notably concerning job security and skill relevance. This has led to the emergence of 'AI anxiety'-a stress response to potential impacts of AI on individuals' futures. This study examines AI anxiety's effects on individuals' willingness to pay for knowledge, focusing on the roles of perceived value and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study consisted of two experiments. Study 1 utilized a one-factor between-subjects design (AI anxiety vs. neutral emotion) with 297 participants to examine the mediating role of perceived value in the relationship between AI anxiety and willingness to pay for knowledge. Study 2 employed a 2 × 2 between-subjects design (AI anxiety vs. neutral emotion )×self-efficacy (high vs. low) with 506 participants to investigate the moderating effect of self-efficacy on this relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study 1 showed that AI anxiety significantly increases the willingness to pay for knowledge, with perceived value partially mediating this effect. Study 2 demonstrated that self-efficacy moderates the influence of AI anxiety: higher self-efficacy levels weaken, whereas lower levels strengthen, the willingness to pay for knowledge. Furthermore, self-efficacy also negatively moderates the effect of AI anxiety on perceived value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI anxiety positively influences payment for knowledge, with critical roles for perceived value and self-efficacy. These findings offer a new framework for understanding AI anxiety's impact on consumer behavior and provide actionable insights for platforms and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02510-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into daily life raises significant challenges and uncertainties, notably concerning job security and skill relevance. This has led to the emergence of 'AI anxiety'-a stress response to potential impacts of AI on individuals' futures. This study examines AI anxiety's effects on individuals' willingness to pay for knowledge, focusing on the roles of perceived value and self-efficacy.

Methods: This study consisted of two experiments. Study 1 utilized a one-factor between-subjects design (AI anxiety vs. neutral emotion) with 297 participants to examine the mediating role of perceived value in the relationship between AI anxiety and willingness to pay for knowledge. Study 2 employed a 2 × 2 between-subjects design (AI anxiety vs. neutral emotion )×self-efficacy (high vs. low) with 506 participants to investigate the moderating effect of self-efficacy on this relationship.

Results: Study 1 showed that AI anxiety significantly increases the willingness to pay for knowledge, with perceived value partially mediating this effect. Study 2 demonstrated that self-efficacy moderates the influence of AI anxiety: higher self-efficacy levels weaken, whereas lower levels strengthen, the willingness to pay for knowledge. Furthermore, self-efficacy also negatively moderates the effect of AI anxiety on perceived value.

Conclusions: AI anxiety positively influences payment for knowledge, with critical roles for perceived value and self-efficacy. These findings offer a new framework for understanding AI anxiety's impact on consumer behavior and provide actionable insights for platforms and policymakers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
AI anxiety and knowledge payment: the roles of perceived value and self-efficacy. Cross-modal co-occurrence analysis of nonverbal behavior and content words, vocal emotion and prosody in individuals with subclinical depression. Group psychological counseling-based growth mindset intervention to promote active aging behaviors in older people: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Romantic relationship status and internalized homophobia in LGB individuals: a parallel mediation model examining the roles of gender and coming out status. The role of format familiarity and semantic transparency in Chinese reading: evidence from eye movements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1