Real-World Analysis Evaluating Treatment Eligibility and Outcomes in Patients With AML Receiving Intensive Chemotherapy: Insights From an Underrepresented Population.

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1200/GO-24-00482
Hasmukh Jain, Thomas Eipe, Alok Shetty, Lingaraj Nayak, Bhausaheb Pandurang Bagal, Neha Sharma, Akash Pawar, Manju Sengar
{"title":"Real-World Analysis Evaluating Treatment Eligibility and Outcomes in Patients With AML Receiving Intensive Chemotherapy: Insights From an Underrepresented Population.","authors":"Hasmukh Jain, Thomas Eipe, Alok Shetty, Lingaraj Nayak, Bhausaheb Pandurang Bagal, Neha Sharma, Akash Pawar, Manju Sengar","doi":"10.1200/GO-24-00482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Over the past decade, there have been significant advancements in the treatment of AML. However, similar progress has not been observed in India, with induction mortality rates surpassing those in high-income countries. Our patient population also differs significantly from those in clinical trials, with about 50% ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Yet, because of limited access to newer therapies and high costs, most of these patients receive intensive therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this study, we retrospectively classified patients who received intensive induction into fit and unfit groups on the basis of landmark trial criteria. Data were extracted from the Indian Acute Leukemia Research Database, a prospective registry maintained under the Hematology Cancer Consortium. The primary objective was induction mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 385 patients with AML treated between 2017 and 2019. The median age at diagnosis was 33 years (range, 15-61). Induction mortality was reported at 6.1% in the fit cohort and 20.2% in the unfit cohort (odds ratio, 3.91 [1.97-7.74]; <i>P</i> < .0001). Factors such as increased age, poor performance status, baseline infection, and low albumin were associated with a poor prognosis for early death. After a median follow-up of 19.2 months, the 2-year overall survival in the overall, fit, and unfit cohorts was 62.7%, 67%, and 58.1%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the baseline characteristics of our patient population and their impact on the outcomes of induction therapy. Unfit patients who received intensive chemotherapy had higher induction mortality and lower overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400482"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Over the past decade, there have been significant advancements in the treatment of AML. However, similar progress has not been observed in India, with induction mortality rates surpassing those in high-income countries. Our patient population also differs significantly from those in clinical trials, with about 50% ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Yet, because of limited access to newer therapies and high costs, most of these patients receive intensive therapy.

Patients and methods: In this study, we retrospectively classified patients who received intensive induction into fit and unfit groups on the basis of landmark trial criteria. Data were extracted from the Indian Acute Leukemia Research Database, a prospective registry maintained under the Hematology Cancer Consortium. The primary objective was induction mortality.

Results: We analyzed 385 patients with AML treated between 2017 and 2019. The median age at diagnosis was 33 years (range, 15-61). Induction mortality was reported at 6.1% in the fit cohort and 20.2% in the unfit cohort (odds ratio, 3.91 [1.97-7.74]; P < .0001). Factors such as increased age, poor performance status, baseline infection, and low albumin were associated with a poor prognosis for early death. After a median follow-up of 19.2 months, the 2-year overall survival in the overall, fit, and unfit cohorts was 62.7%, 67%, and 58.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the baseline characteristics of our patient population and their impact on the outcomes of induction therapy. Unfit patients who received intensive chemotherapy had higher induction mortality and lower overall survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Germline Genetic Testing in Breast Cancer: Utilization and Disparities in a Middle-Income Country. Intrainfusion Drug Monitoring and Algorithm-Based Dose Adjustments for Children With ALL Receiving High-Dose Methotrexate Are Feasible and Safe in Costa Rica, a Low- and Middle-Income Country. Phase II Evaluation of Ultra-Hypofractionated Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer: Toxicity and Efficacy in a Single-Center Nonrandomized Prospective Study. Prospective Evaluation of the Pathologic Diagnosis and Treatment Outcomes of Pediatric Burkitt Lymphoma in the Central American Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Association Consortium. Real-World Analysis Evaluating Treatment Eligibility and Outcomes in Patients With AML Receiving Intensive Chemotherapy: Insights From an Underrepresented Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1