Real-World Analysis Evaluating Treatment Eligibility and Outcomes in Patients With AML Receiving Intensive Chemotherapy: Insights From an Underrepresented Population.

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1200/GO-24-00482
Hasmukh Jain, Thomas Eipe, Alok Shetty, Lingaraj Nayak, Bhausaheb Pandurang Bagal, Neha Sharma, Akash Pawar, Manju Sengar
{"title":"Real-World Analysis Evaluating Treatment Eligibility and Outcomes in Patients With AML Receiving Intensive Chemotherapy: Insights From an Underrepresented Population.","authors":"Hasmukh Jain, Thomas Eipe, Alok Shetty, Lingaraj Nayak, Bhausaheb Pandurang Bagal, Neha Sharma, Akash Pawar, Manju Sengar","doi":"10.1200/GO-24-00482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Over the past decade, there have been significant advancements in the treatment of AML. However, similar progress has not been observed in India, with induction mortality rates surpassing those in high-income countries. Our patient population also differs significantly from those in clinical trials, with about 50% ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Yet, because of limited access to newer therapies and high costs, most of these patients receive intensive therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this study, we retrospectively classified patients who received intensive induction into fit and unfit groups on the basis of landmark trial criteria. Data were extracted from the Indian Acute Leukemia Research Database, a prospective registry maintained under the Hematology Cancer Consortium. The primary objective was induction mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 385 patients with AML treated between 2017 and 2019. The median age at diagnosis was 33 years (range, 15-61). Induction mortality was reported at 6.1% in the fit cohort and 20.2% in the unfit cohort (odds ratio, 3.91 [1.97-7.74]; <i>P</i> < .0001). Factors such as increased age, poor performance status, baseline infection, and low albumin were associated with a poor prognosis for early death. After a median follow-up of 19.2 months, the 2-year overall survival in the overall, fit, and unfit cohorts was 62.7%, 67%, and 58.1%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the baseline characteristics of our patient population and their impact on the outcomes of induction therapy. Unfit patients who received intensive chemotherapy had higher induction mortality and lower overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400482"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Over the past decade, there have been significant advancements in the treatment of AML. However, similar progress has not been observed in India, with induction mortality rates surpassing those in high-income countries. Our patient population also differs significantly from those in clinical trials, with about 50% ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Yet, because of limited access to newer therapies and high costs, most of these patients receive intensive therapy.

Patients and methods: In this study, we retrospectively classified patients who received intensive induction into fit and unfit groups on the basis of landmark trial criteria. Data were extracted from the Indian Acute Leukemia Research Database, a prospective registry maintained under the Hematology Cancer Consortium. The primary objective was induction mortality.

Results: We analyzed 385 patients with AML treated between 2017 and 2019. The median age at diagnosis was 33 years (range, 15-61). Induction mortality was reported at 6.1% in the fit cohort and 20.2% in the unfit cohort (odds ratio, 3.91 [1.97-7.74]; P < .0001). Factors such as increased age, poor performance status, baseline infection, and low albumin were associated with a poor prognosis for early death. After a median follow-up of 19.2 months, the 2-year overall survival in the overall, fit, and unfit cohorts was 62.7%, 67%, and 58.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the baseline characteristics of our patient population and their impact on the outcomes of induction therapy. Unfit patients who received intensive chemotherapy had higher induction mortality and lower overall survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真实世界分析评估接受强化化疗的AML患者的治疗资格和结果:来自代表性不足人群的见解
目的:在过去的十年中,AML的治疗取得了重大进展。然而,在印度没有观察到类似的进展,其诱发死亡率超过了高收入国家。我们的患者群体与临床试验的患者群体也有很大不同,大约50%的患者不适合接受强化化疗。然而,由于获得新疗法的机会有限且费用高昂,这些患者中的大多数接受强化治疗。患者和方法:在本研究中,我们根据具有里程碑意义的试验标准将接受强化诱导的患者回顾性地分为适合组和不适合组。数据从印度急性白血病研究数据库中提取,该数据库是血液学癌症协会维护的前瞻性注册表。主要目的是诱发死亡率。结果:我们分析了2017年至2019年期间治疗的385例AML患者。诊断时的中位年龄为33岁(范围15-61岁)。适宜队列的诱导死亡率为6.1%,不适宜队列的诱导死亡率为20.2%(优势比为3.91 [1.97-7.74];P < 0.0001)。年龄增加、表现不佳、基线感染和低白蛋白等因素与早期死亡的不良预后相关。中位随访19.2个月后,整体组、适合组和不适合组的2年总生存率分别为62.7%、67%和58.1%。结论:我们的研究结果突出了患者群体的基线特征及其对诱导治疗结果的影响。不适合接受强化化疗的患者有较高的诱导死亡率和较低的总生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Risk Factors for Early Mortality in Adult ALL in Brazil. Chemotherapy Medications in Sub-Saharan Africa: Availability, Pricing, Affordability, and Predictors of Quality. National Trends in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Incidence and Challenges in the Republic of Ireland. Global Trials, Local Relevance: A Scientific and Regulatory Framework for Regional Enrollment in Cancer Drug Development. Gastric Cancer Mortality-to-Incidence Ratios in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Machine Learning Analysis of Socioeconomic and Clinical Research Predictors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1