Effect of deep brain stimulation on nonmotor symptoms in essential tremor.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-03-07 Print Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.11.JNS241990
Anthony E Bishay, Alexander T Lyons, Daniel R S Habib, Natasha C Hughes, Isabel Long, Michael Zargari, Helen Qian, Danika Paulo, Jessica E Summers, Rui Li, Steven Bishay, Douglas P Terry, Benoit M Dawant, Tyler J Ball, Peter E Konrad, Dario J Englot, Kaltra Dhima, Sarah K Bick
{"title":"Effect of deep brain stimulation on nonmotor symptoms in essential tremor.","authors":"Anthony E Bishay, Alexander T Lyons, Daniel R S Habib, Natasha C Hughes, Isabel Long, Michael Zargari, Helen Qian, Danika Paulo, Jessica E Summers, Rui Li, Steven Bishay, Douglas P Terry, Benoit M Dawant, Tyler J Ball, Peter E Konrad, Dario J Englot, Kaltra Dhima, Sarah K Bick","doi":"10.3171/2024.11.JNS241990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Essential tremor (ET) is a prevalent movement disorder that also includes nonmotor symptoms such as anxiety, depression, and cognitive impairment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for ET, yet its impact on nonmotor symptoms remains unclear. This study aims to describe neuropsychological outcomes following ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) DBS in a large cohort of patients with ET and identify factors associated with changes in depression and cognitive function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of patients who had undergone VIM DBS was performed. Inclusion criteria were ET diagnosis, surgery between October 2007 and March 2020, and available pre- and post-DBS neuropsychological testing results. Neuropsychological measures included the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and cognitive measures assessing attention, executive function, language, memory, and visuospatial function. Post-DBS tremor improvement was graded, and active electrode coordinates and stimulation parameters were identified. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, t-tests to compare pre- and postoperative scores at the group level, and one-way analysis of variance to compare variables among patients who improved, were stable, or worsened in psychiatric and cognitive characteristics after DBS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirty-nine patients met the study inclusion criteria. BDI-II scores significantly decreased postoperatively (9.82 ± 6.77 vs 8.29 ± 6.18, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.176), whereas BAI scores remained unchanged. Both language (p = 0.003, Cohen's d = 0.259) and memory (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.336) domains showed statistically significant small-magnitude declines following surgery, whereas attention, executive function, and visuospatial function were unchanged. Patients with improved depression (14.3%) following VIM DBS had significantly higher BDI-II scores preoperatively (p < 0.001, ω2 = 0.226). Patients with worsened language (18.7%) had higher preoperative language scores (p < 0.001, ω2 = 0.058). Patients with worsened memory (15.1%) had higher BAI scores preoperatively (p = 0.002, ω2 = 0.079). Preoperative scores were similar between patients with improved and worsened overall cognition postsurgery. Patients with improved overall cognition had improvements in attention, language, and visuospatial function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VIM DBS for ET did not result in large-magnitude neuropsychological changes. There were statistically significant, though likely not clinically meaningful, small-magnitude improvements in depression and worsening in language and memory scores. Associations were found between multiple preoperative mood and cognitive scores and post-DBS neuropsychological changes. These findings can help inform clinical decision-making and patient counseling for DBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"38-52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.11.JNS241990","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Essential tremor (ET) is a prevalent movement disorder that also includes nonmotor symptoms such as anxiety, depression, and cognitive impairment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for ET, yet its impact on nonmotor symptoms remains unclear. This study aims to describe neuropsychological outcomes following ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) DBS in a large cohort of patients with ET and identify factors associated with changes in depression and cognitive function.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients who had undergone VIM DBS was performed. Inclusion criteria were ET diagnosis, surgery between October 2007 and March 2020, and available pre- and post-DBS neuropsychological testing results. Neuropsychological measures included the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and cognitive measures assessing attention, executive function, language, memory, and visuospatial function. Post-DBS tremor improvement was graded, and active electrode coordinates and stimulation parameters were identified. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, t-tests to compare pre- and postoperative scores at the group level, and one-way analysis of variance to compare variables among patients who improved, were stable, or worsened in psychiatric and cognitive characteristics after DBS.

Results: One hundred thirty-nine patients met the study inclusion criteria. BDI-II scores significantly decreased postoperatively (9.82 ± 6.77 vs 8.29 ± 6.18, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.176), whereas BAI scores remained unchanged. Both language (p = 0.003, Cohen's d = 0.259) and memory (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.336) domains showed statistically significant small-magnitude declines following surgery, whereas attention, executive function, and visuospatial function were unchanged. Patients with improved depression (14.3%) following VIM DBS had significantly higher BDI-II scores preoperatively (p < 0.001, ω2 = 0.226). Patients with worsened language (18.7%) had higher preoperative language scores (p < 0.001, ω2 = 0.058). Patients with worsened memory (15.1%) had higher BAI scores preoperatively (p = 0.002, ω2 = 0.079). Preoperative scores were similar between patients with improved and worsened overall cognition postsurgery. Patients with improved overall cognition had improvements in attention, language, and visuospatial function.

Conclusions: VIM DBS for ET did not result in large-magnitude neuropsychological changes. There were statistically significant, though likely not clinically meaningful, small-magnitude improvements in depression and worsening in language and memory scores. Associations were found between multiple preoperative mood and cognitive scores and post-DBS neuropsychological changes. These findings can help inform clinical decision-making and patient counseling for DBS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑深部电刺激对特发性震颤非运动症状的影响。
目的:特发性震颤(ET)是一种常见的运动障碍,还包括非运动症状,如焦虑、抑郁和认知障碍。脑深部电刺激(DBS)是治疗ET的一种有效方法,但其对非运动症状的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在描述大量ET患者腹侧中间核(VIM) DBS后的神经心理学结果,并确定与抑郁和认知功能变化相关的因素。方法:对接受VIM DBS的患者进行回顾性队列研究。纳入标准为ET诊断,2007年10月至2020年3月间的手术,以及dbs前后可用的神经心理测试结果。神经心理学测量包括贝克抑郁量表- ii (BDI-II)、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)以及评估注意力、执行功能、语言、记忆和视觉空间功能的认知测量。dbs后震颤改善程度分级,并确定活动电极坐标和刺激参数。统计分析包括描述性统计,比较组前和术后评分的t检验,以及比较DBS后精神和认知特征改善、稳定或恶化的患者变量的单向方差分析。结果:139例患者符合研究纳入标准。BDI-II评分术后显著降低(9.82±6.77 vs 8.29±6.18,p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.176),而BAI评分维持不变。手术后,语言(p = 0.003, Cohen’s d = 0.259)和记忆(p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.336)领域均出现统计学意义上的小幅度下降,而注意力、执行功能和视觉空间功能没有变化。VIM DBS术后抑郁改善患者(14.3%)术前BDI-II评分显著高于对照组(p < 0.001, ω2 = 0.226)。语言恶化患者(18.7%)术前语言评分较高(p < 0.001, ω2 = 0.058)。记忆恶化患者(15.1%)术前BAI评分较高(p = 0.002, ω2 = 0.079)。术后整体认知改善和恶化患者的术前评分相似。整体认知能力改善的患者在注意力、语言和视觉空间功能方面均有改善。结论:VIM DBS治疗ET未引起大范围的神经心理改变。虽然可能没有临床意义,但在抑郁方面有小幅度的改善,在语言和记忆方面得分有所恶化,这在统计学上是显著的。术前多项情绪和认知评分与dbs后神经心理变化之间存在关联。这些发现有助于为DBS的临床决策和患者咨询提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with moyamoya disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Effective management of traumatic venous sinus injuries in a resource-limited health system: a retrospective cohort study. Reevaluating routine imaging: clinical utility of postoperative CT after stereotactic brain biopsy. Letter to the Editor. Traumatic cerebral contusion volume, expansion, outcomes, and predictive models. The neurosurgery sports medicine fellowship: a pioneering training paradigm for neurosurgery residents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1