{"title":"Who is to blame for AV crashes? Public perceptions of blame attribution using text mining based on social media","authors":"Heyuan Sun , Yutong Chen , Ying Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are transitioning from the laboratory to the market phase. However, frequent AV crashes hindered the commercialization. Since the human driver and AV systems jointly control the vehicle, responsibility is difficult to attribute. Previous research primarily investigated the blame attribution in AV crashes from an ethical or legal perspective using traditional questionnaires based on vignette-based scenarios, but reached contradictory conclusions. Public perception, as a significant source of law, is often overlooked. The research extracted 90,426 valid comments on Chinese social media platforms (Sina Weibo and TikTok) about AV crashes from April 2021 to January 2025, breaking down the limitations of traditional attribution research with novel data sources. Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model exceeds other deep learning models in classification accuracy of blame attribution comments. The Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) results revealed an interesting topic <em>Publicity</em>, expanding the targets of traditional research. Regarding the topic <em>AV system</em>, the public appeared to have difficulty in classifying AV levels, with the highest blame volume and most negative sentiments. Importantly, we found certain connections among topics that chaotic publicity results in biased public perceptions of AV systems, thereby leading to over-trust in AV technology, which ultimately increases crash rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 108627"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000743","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are transitioning from the laboratory to the market phase. However, frequent AV crashes hindered the commercialization. Since the human driver and AV systems jointly control the vehicle, responsibility is difficult to attribute. Previous research primarily investigated the blame attribution in AV crashes from an ethical or legal perspective using traditional questionnaires based on vignette-based scenarios, but reached contradictory conclusions. Public perception, as a significant source of law, is often overlooked. The research extracted 90,426 valid comments on Chinese social media platforms (Sina Weibo and TikTok) about AV crashes from April 2021 to January 2025, breaking down the limitations of traditional attribution research with novel data sources. Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model exceeds other deep learning models in classification accuracy of blame attribution comments. The Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) results revealed an interesting topic Publicity, expanding the targets of traditional research. Regarding the topic AV system, the public appeared to have difficulty in classifying AV levels, with the highest blame volume and most negative sentiments. Importantly, we found certain connections among topics that chaotic publicity results in biased public perceptions of AV systems, thereby leading to over-trust in AV technology, which ultimately increases crash rates.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.