Efficacy and safety of antithrombin or recombinant human thrombomodulin in the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Thrombosis research Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109302
Wenchi Li , Shuyue Sheng , Feng Zhu
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of antithrombin or recombinant human thrombomodulin in the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Wenchi Li ,&nbsp;Shuyue Sheng ,&nbsp;Feng Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Multiple organ damage is a hallmark of the highly lethal condition known as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The efficacy and safety of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) and antithrombin (AT) in DIC is still debatable. Therefore, we used a fixed-effects model to conduct a comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis to examine the safety and efficacy of AT or rhTM administration for treating DIC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Up until September 2024, the databases of the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and CNKI were searched for pertinent papers that satisfied the inclusion requirements. Following the researchers' review of the literature, data extraction, and quality assessment, RevMan 5.4 software was used to conduct meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The AT group included two randomized controlled trials with 95 patients, 47 in the test and 48 in the control groups. The test group's DIC resolution rate was higher than the control group's (OR = 5.21 [2.10, 12.90], P = 0.0004), while the 28-day mortality and bleeding-related adverse events did not differ significantly (OR = 0.45 [0.16, 1.31], P = 0.14; OR = 1.02 [0.22, 4.74], P = 0.98). Of the 1105 patients in the rhTM group, 554 were in the trial group and 551 were in the control group across four randomized controlled trials. The trial group showed a greater rate of DIC resolution than the control group (OR = 1.76 [1.34, 2.30], P &lt; 0.0001), although there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate or bleeding-related adverse events. (OR = 0.79 [0.59, 1.05], P = 0.11; OR = 1.08 [0.63, 1.86], P = 0.78).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both AT and rhTM therapy improved the rate of symptomatic relief in patients with DIC without increasing the risk of bleeding, but there was no benefit in terms of their mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23064,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis research","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 109302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384825000519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Multiple organ damage is a hallmark of the highly lethal condition known as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The efficacy and safety of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) and antithrombin (AT) in DIC is still debatable. Therefore, we used a fixed-effects model to conduct a comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis to examine the safety and efficacy of AT or rhTM administration for treating DIC.

Methods

Up until September 2024, the databases of the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and CNKI were searched for pertinent papers that satisfied the inclusion requirements. Following the researchers' review of the literature, data extraction, and quality assessment, RevMan 5.4 software was used to conduct meta-analysis.

Results

The AT group included two randomized controlled trials with 95 patients, 47 in the test and 48 in the control groups. The test group's DIC resolution rate was higher than the control group's (OR = 5.21 [2.10, 12.90], P = 0.0004), while the 28-day mortality and bleeding-related adverse events did not differ significantly (OR = 0.45 [0.16, 1.31], P = 0.14; OR = 1.02 [0.22, 4.74], P = 0.98). Of the 1105 patients in the rhTM group, 554 were in the trial group and 551 were in the control group across four randomized controlled trials. The trial group showed a greater rate of DIC resolution than the control group (OR = 1.76 [1.34, 2.30], P < 0.0001), although there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate or bleeding-related adverse events. (OR = 0.79 [0.59, 1.05], P = 0.11; OR = 1.08 [0.63, 1.86], P = 0.78).

Conclusion

Both AT and rhTM therapy improved the rate of symptomatic relief in patients with DIC without increasing the risk of bleeding, but there was no benefit in terms of their mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis research
Thrombosis research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
364
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Research is an international journal dedicated to the swift dissemination of new information on thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular biology, aimed at advancing both science and clinical care. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, editorials, opinions, and critiques, covering both basic and clinical studies. Priority is given to research that promises novel approaches in the diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic diseases.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of antithrombin or recombinant human thrombomodulin in the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis Editorial Board Clinical outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with thrombosis in unusual sites: Insights from a tertiary care center The efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparins for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1