Efficacy and safety of antithrombin or recombinant human thrombomodulin in the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of antithrombin or recombinant human thrombomodulin in the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Wenchi Li , Shuyue Sheng , Feng Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Multiple organ damage is a hallmark of the highly lethal condition known as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The efficacy and safety of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) and antithrombin (AT) in DIC is still debatable. Therefore, we used a fixed-effects model to conduct a comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis to examine the safety and efficacy of AT or rhTM administration for treating DIC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Up until September 2024, the databases of the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and CNKI were searched for pertinent papers that satisfied the inclusion requirements. Following the researchers' review of the literature, data extraction, and quality assessment, RevMan 5.4 software was used to conduct meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The AT group included two randomized controlled trials with 95 patients, 47 in the test and 48 in the control groups. The test group's DIC resolution rate was higher than the control group's (OR = 5.21 [2.10, 12.90], P = 0.0004), while the 28-day mortality and bleeding-related adverse events did not differ significantly (OR = 0.45 [0.16, 1.31], P = 0.14; OR = 1.02 [0.22, 4.74], P = 0.98). Of the 1105 patients in the rhTM group, 554 were in the trial group and 551 were in the control group across four randomized controlled trials. The trial group showed a greater rate of DIC resolution than the control group (OR = 1.76 [1.34, 2.30], P < 0.0001), although there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate or bleeding-related adverse events. (OR = 0.79 [0.59, 1.05], P = 0.11; OR = 1.08 [0.63, 1.86], P = 0.78).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both AT and rhTM therapy improved the rate of symptomatic relief in patients with DIC without increasing the risk of bleeding, but there was no benefit in terms of their mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23064,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis research","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 109302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384825000519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Multiple organ damage is a hallmark of the highly lethal condition known as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The efficacy and safety of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) and antithrombin (AT) in DIC is still debatable. Therefore, we used a fixed-effects model to conduct a comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis to examine the safety and efficacy of AT or rhTM administration for treating DIC.
Methods
Up until September 2024, the databases of the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and CNKI were searched for pertinent papers that satisfied the inclusion requirements. Following the researchers' review of the literature, data extraction, and quality assessment, RevMan 5.4 software was used to conduct meta-analysis.
Results
The AT group included two randomized controlled trials with 95 patients, 47 in the test and 48 in the control groups. The test group's DIC resolution rate was higher than the control group's (OR = 5.21 [2.10, 12.90], P = 0.0004), while the 28-day mortality and bleeding-related adverse events did not differ significantly (OR = 0.45 [0.16, 1.31], P = 0.14; OR = 1.02 [0.22, 4.74], P = 0.98). Of the 1105 patients in the rhTM group, 554 were in the trial group and 551 were in the control group across four randomized controlled trials. The trial group showed a greater rate of DIC resolution than the control group (OR = 1.76 [1.34, 2.30], P < 0.0001), although there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate or bleeding-related adverse events. (OR = 0.79 [0.59, 1.05], P = 0.11; OR = 1.08 [0.63, 1.86], P = 0.78).
Conclusion
Both AT and rhTM therapy improved the rate of symptomatic relief in patients with DIC without increasing the risk of bleeding, but there was no benefit in terms of their mortality.
期刊介绍:
Thrombosis Research is an international journal dedicated to the swift dissemination of new information on thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular biology, aimed at advancing both science and clinical care. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, editorials, opinions, and critiques, covering both basic and clinical studies. Priority is given to research that promises novel approaches in the diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic diseases.