3D non-contrast whole‑heart coronary MR angiography at 3 T with compressed sensing in elderly patients: Optimization of the acceleration factor

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Open Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100641
Yue Jiang , Qiuju Hu , Yane Zhao , Dongsheng Jin , Guangming Lu , Tong Chen , Yong Yuan , Wenjing Liu
{"title":"3D non-contrast whole‑heart coronary MR angiography at 3 T with compressed sensing in elderly patients: Optimization of the acceleration factor","authors":"Yue Jiang ,&nbsp;Qiuju Hu ,&nbsp;Yane Zhao ,&nbsp;Dongsheng Jin ,&nbsp;Guangming Lu ,&nbsp;Tong Chen ,&nbsp;Yong Yuan ,&nbsp;Wenjing Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) is increasingly used in clinical practice, but lengthy scan times can be challenging for elderly patients. This study evaluates the impact of compressed sensing (CS) technology on image quality and diagnostic performance of 3 T CMRA in elderly patients, aiming to identify the optimal acceleration factor.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We prospectively enrolled elderly individuals who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) from June to November 2023 for non-contrast whole-heart CMRA with CS acceleration factors of 4, 6, or 8. Elderly volunteers rated their experiences with the optimal acceleration factor. Image quality and diagnostic performance were analyzed using a general linear model and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), with CCTA as the reference standard.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-seven individuals (34 men, mean age 74.3 ± 7.2 years) were enrolled. Scan times significantly decreased from 578.6 ± 131.4 s to 366.1 ± 91.2 s and 261.1 ± 76.5 s for acceleration factors 4, 6, and 8, respectively. Subjective image quality scores, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were significantly better with CS4 and CS6 than with CS8. Diagnostic performance declined with increasing acceleration, with sensitivities of 92.2 %, 88.0 %, and 72.5 %, and specificities of 94.1 %, 92.6 %, and 85.3 % for CS4, CS6, and CS8, respectively. CS6 was determined to be the optimal acceleration factor. Volunteers reported that CS6 was more acceptable than CS4.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CMRA with CS6 provides rapid scanning while maintaining adequate diagnostic performance, making it a reliable alternative to CCTA for diagnosing coronary artery disease in elderly patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100641"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047725000085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) is increasingly used in clinical practice, but lengthy scan times can be challenging for elderly patients. This study evaluates the impact of compressed sensing (CS) technology on image quality and diagnostic performance of 3 T CMRA in elderly patients, aiming to identify the optimal acceleration factor.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled elderly individuals who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) from June to November 2023 for non-contrast whole-heart CMRA with CS acceleration factors of 4, 6, or 8. Elderly volunteers rated their experiences with the optimal acceleration factor. Image quality and diagnostic performance were analyzed using a general linear model and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), with CCTA as the reference standard.

Results

Sixty-seven individuals (34 men, mean age 74.3 ± 7.2 years) were enrolled. Scan times significantly decreased from 578.6 ± 131.4 s to 366.1 ± 91.2 s and 261.1 ± 76.5 s for acceleration factors 4, 6, and 8, respectively. Subjective image quality scores, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were significantly better with CS4 and CS6 than with CS8. Diagnostic performance declined with increasing acceleration, with sensitivities of 92.2 %, 88.0 %, and 72.5 %, and specificities of 94.1 %, 92.6 %, and 85.3 % for CS4, CS6, and CS8, respectively. CS6 was determined to be the optimal acceleration factor. Volunteers reported that CS6 was more acceptable than CS4.

Conclusions

CMRA with CS6 provides rapid scanning while maintaining adequate diagnostic performance, making it a reliable alternative to CCTA for diagnosing coronary artery disease in elderly patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
3D non-contrast whole‑heart coronary MR angiography at 3 T with compressed sensing in elderly patients: Optimization of the acceleration factor Role of region-of-interest magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in mitigating overtreatment of localized prostate cancer – A retrospective cohort study Neurochemical characteristics of pathological tissues in epilepsy: A preliminary 1H MR spectroscopy study at 7 T Prediction of lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma using non-contrast CT-based radiomics and deep learning with thyroid lobe segmentation: A dual-center study Prediction of plaque progression using different machine learning models of pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics based on coronary computed tomography angiography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1