The Great Mississippi River Flood of 1927: Morphodynamic analysis of the Caernarvon crevasse event

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ecss.2025.109234
Ahmed Khalifa , Ehab Meselhe , Kelin Hu , John Day , Mead Allison
{"title":"The Great Mississippi River Flood of 1927: Morphodynamic analysis of the Caernarvon crevasse event","authors":"Ahmed Khalifa ,&nbsp;Ehab Meselhe ,&nbsp;Kelin Hu ,&nbsp;John Day ,&nbsp;Mead Allison","doi":"10.1016/j.ecss.2025.109234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wetlands in deltas across the globe have been severely affected by climate change-induced sea level rise. One strategy to mitigate these impacts is to engineer large river sediment diversions. In this study, we use a morphodynamic model to simulate and quantify the depositional footprint of the 80-day Caernarvon crevasse event that occurred during the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 in Breton Sound Basin, Louisiana, USA, as an analog to engineered diversions. We examine the effects of river sediment load by modeling the same crevasse splay formation under the past, current-day, and future projected sediment load decline of the Lower Mississippi River. To assess the model's performance, we compared crevasse formation to field-measured deposition thickness and mass per area. The model shows that under current sediment loads, a flood discharge comparable to the 1927 event would build 70% less land was it to occur today. Further, silt falling velocity and clay flocculation percentage are the two key factors controlling splay footprint and deposition. The model also demonstrates the effects of sediment supply decline on the land-building potential of engineered sediment diversions. These sediment diversions, designed to mimic natural crevasse splay formation, are being pursued as a coastal restoration strategy in the Mississippi Delta. The analysis presented here emphasizes key attributes of engineered diversions and their relevance to the successful implementation of these restoration strategies, including flow capacity, ability to distribute sediment in the receiving area, and the extent to which they would induce marsh inundation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50497,"journal":{"name":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","volume":"318 ","pages":"Article 109234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027277142500112X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wetlands in deltas across the globe have been severely affected by climate change-induced sea level rise. One strategy to mitigate these impacts is to engineer large river sediment diversions. In this study, we use a morphodynamic model to simulate and quantify the depositional footprint of the 80-day Caernarvon crevasse event that occurred during the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 in Breton Sound Basin, Louisiana, USA, as an analog to engineered diversions. We examine the effects of river sediment load by modeling the same crevasse splay formation under the past, current-day, and future projected sediment load decline of the Lower Mississippi River. To assess the model's performance, we compared crevasse formation to field-measured deposition thickness and mass per area. The model shows that under current sediment loads, a flood discharge comparable to the 1927 event would build 70% less land was it to occur today. Further, silt falling velocity and clay flocculation percentage are the two key factors controlling splay footprint and deposition. The model also demonstrates the effects of sediment supply decline on the land-building potential of engineered sediment diversions. These sediment diversions, designed to mimic natural crevasse splay formation, are being pursued as a coastal restoration strategy in the Mississippi Delta. The analysis presented here emphasizes key attributes of engineered diversions and their relevance to the successful implementation of these restoration strategies, including flow capacity, ability to distribute sediment in the receiving area, and the extent to which they would induce marsh inundation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science is an international multidisciplinary journal devoted to the analysis of saline water phenomena ranging from the outer edge of the continental shelf to the upper limits of the tidal zone. The journal provides a unique forum, unifying the multidisciplinary approaches to the study of the oceanography of estuaries, coastal zones, and continental shelf seas. It features original research papers, review papers and short communications treating such disciplines as zoology, botany, geology, sedimentology, physical oceanography.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The Great Mississippi River Flood of 1927: Morphodynamic analysis of the Caernarvon crevasse event Possible processes responsible for the decline in the stock of Manila clam based on long-term observations in Banzu tidal flat Seasonal and spatial distribution of trace metals and bacteria on beached plastics in the Adriatic sea Erratum to ’Science and management achieving connectivity, coherence and equivalence to ensure the health of estuarine fish communities’ [Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 314 (2025) 1–11/109133]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1