The second-order probabilistic pool punishment proportional to the payoff difference can solve the punishment problem of previous studies

IF 5.7 1区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Chaos Solitons & Fractals Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116255
Tetsushi Ohdaira
{"title":"The second-order probabilistic pool punishment proportional to the payoff difference can solve the punishment problem of previous studies","authors":"Tetsushi Ohdaira","doi":"10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The public goods game is one of the models utilized in theoretical studies of social dilemmas where the pursuit of individual interests does not benefit society as a whole. In the context of the public goods game, the optimal response of participants is defecting (not investing in the public goods). Therefore, the evolution of cooperation in the public goods game generally requires punishment or reward. Out of these two elements, this study deals with punishment. There are two types of punishment: peer punishment and pool punishment. The problem of peer punishment is the high cost of punishment, and the problem of pool punishment is that the cost of punishment is always incurred. Here, extending the previously proposed probabilistic pool punishment, we consider the punishment on cooperators (second-order free riders) as well as defectors. Comparing the pool punishment of this study with pool and peer punishment of existing studies, especially in terms of the average payoff, it is superior to those previous punishment mechanisms. In addition, the various programming techniques in the construction of the simulator in this study are expected to be utilized as teaching materials for specialized education at Kanagawa Institute of Technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9764,"journal":{"name":"Chaos Solitons & Fractals","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 116255"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chaos Solitons & Fractals","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925002681","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The public goods game is one of the models utilized in theoretical studies of social dilemmas where the pursuit of individual interests does not benefit society as a whole. In the context of the public goods game, the optimal response of participants is defecting (not investing in the public goods). Therefore, the evolution of cooperation in the public goods game generally requires punishment or reward. Out of these two elements, this study deals with punishment. There are two types of punishment: peer punishment and pool punishment. The problem of peer punishment is the high cost of punishment, and the problem of pool punishment is that the cost of punishment is always incurred. Here, extending the previously proposed probabilistic pool punishment, we consider the punishment on cooperators (second-order free riders) as well as defectors. Comparing the pool punishment of this study with pool and peer punishment of existing studies, especially in terms of the average payoff, it is superior to those previous punishment mechanisms. In addition, the various programming techniques in the construction of the simulator in this study are expected to be utilized as teaching materials for specialized education at Kanagawa Institute of Technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与收益差成比例的二阶概率池惩罚可以解决以往研究的惩罚问题
公共物品博弈是对个人利益的追求不利于整个社会的社会困境进行理论研究的模型之一。在公共产品博弈中,参与者的最优反应是背叛(不投资于公共产品)。因此,在公共物品博弈中,合作的演化通常需要惩罚或奖励。在这两个要素中,本研究涉及惩罚。惩罚有两种:同伴惩罚和集体惩罚。同伴惩罚的问题是惩罚成本高,池惩罚的问题是惩罚成本始终存在。在此,我们扩展了先前提出的概率池惩罚,考虑了对合作者(二阶搭便车者)和叛逃者的惩罚。将本研究的池惩罚与已有研究的池惩罚和同伴惩罚进行比较,特别是在平均收益方面,优于以往的惩罚机制。此外,本研究所建构的各种程式设计技术,可望作为神奈川工业大学专业教育的教材。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chaos Solitons & Fractals
Chaos Solitons & Fractals 物理-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
1087
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Chaos, Solitons & Fractals strives to establish itself as a premier journal in the interdisciplinary realm of Nonlinear Science, Non-equilibrium, and Complex Phenomena. It welcomes submissions covering a broad spectrum of topics within this field, including dynamics, non-equilibrium processes in physics, chemistry, and geophysics, complex matter and networks, mathematical models, computational biology, applications to quantum and mesoscopic phenomena, fluctuations and random processes, self-organization, and social phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Noise-induced basin erosion and energy response in a quasi-zero-stiffness energy harvester Iterated Local Anti-Transitivity model for signed complex networks Non-stationary signal decomposition and wavelet coherence analysis for characterizing long-term coal and gas outburst dynamics Floquet-engineered selective sideband control in driven two-qubit systems Planar dynamical system method and Separatrix geometry for a generalized Davey–Stewartson system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1