Intragroup social differentiation and household inequality in prehistoric Mumun settlements of Korea

IF 2 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of Anthropological Archaeology Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jaa.2025.101679
Minkoo Kim
{"title":"Intragroup social differentiation and household inequality in prehistoric Mumun settlements of Korea","authors":"Minkoo Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jaa.2025.101679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines intra-settlement social inequality across 73 Mumun settlements (ca. 1500–1 BCE) on the southern Korean Peninsula using the Gini index and Lorenz curve. House size and pottery density are employed as proxies for socioeconomic power and the capacity for food storage and sharing, respectively. The analysis reveals a nuanced understanding of Mumun social complexity. Variations in house sizes show low Gini scores, suggesting a degree of egalitarian intragroup relationships. However, communal infrastructures, such as paddy field systems, defensive structures, and dolmens, indicate community-wide collaboration and the presence of managerial leadership. Furthermore, the significantly high Gini scores for pottery density demonstrate greater inter-household economic inequality, driven by factors such as craftsmanship. These observations collectively suggest that Mumun intra-settlement relationships were founded on principles of equality, with people collaborating to achieve common goals and benefits while seeking to accumulate wealth on a household basis. Overall, the settlement datasets indicate that Mumun social relations contained elements of both egalitarianism and increasing complexity, although the data do not indicate that intra-settlement social inequality intensified over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101679"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278416525000248","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines intra-settlement social inequality across 73 Mumun settlements (ca. 1500–1 BCE) on the southern Korean Peninsula using the Gini index and Lorenz curve. House size and pottery density are employed as proxies for socioeconomic power and the capacity for food storage and sharing, respectively. The analysis reveals a nuanced understanding of Mumun social complexity. Variations in house sizes show low Gini scores, suggesting a degree of egalitarian intragroup relationships. However, communal infrastructures, such as paddy field systems, defensive structures, and dolmens, indicate community-wide collaboration and the presence of managerial leadership. Furthermore, the significantly high Gini scores for pottery density demonstrate greater inter-household economic inequality, driven by factors such as craftsmanship. These observations collectively suggest that Mumun intra-settlement relationships were founded on principles of equality, with people collaborating to achieve common goals and benefits while seeking to accumulate wealth on a household basis. Overall, the settlement datasets indicate that Mumun social relations contained elements of both egalitarianism and increasing complexity, although the data do not indicate that intra-settlement social inequality intensified over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: An innovative, international publication, the Journal of Anthropological Archaeology is devoted to the development of theory and, in a broad sense, methodology for the systematic and rigorous understanding of the organization, operation, and evolution of human societies. The discipline served by the journal is characterized by its goals and approach, not by geographical or temporal bounds. The data utilized or treated range from the earliest archaeological evidence for the emergence of human culture to historically documented societies and the contemporary observations of the ethnographer, ethnoarchaeologist, sociologist, or geographer. These subjects appear in the journal as examples of cultural organization, operation, and evolution, not as specific historical phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Intragroup social differentiation and household inequality in prehistoric Mumun settlements of Korea Daily life in a New Kingdom fortress town in Nubia: A reexamination of physical activity at Tombos Editorial Board A collaborative synthetic view of migration in archaeology: Addressing challenges for policymakers Mind the gap: Modeling Mississippian migration and frontier settlement in southwest Virginia, USA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1