Intragroup social differentiation and household inequality in prehistoric Mumun settlements of Korea

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of Anthropological Archaeology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jaa.2025.101679
Minkoo Kim
{"title":"Intragroup social differentiation and household inequality in prehistoric Mumun settlements of Korea","authors":"Minkoo Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jaa.2025.101679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines intra-settlement social inequality across 73 Mumun settlements (ca. 1500–1 BCE) on the southern Korean Peninsula using the Gini index and Lorenz curve. House size and pottery density are employed as proxies for socioeconomic power and the capacity for food storage and sharing, respectively. The analysis reveals a nuanced understanding of Mumun social complexity. Variations in house sizes show low Gini scores, suggesting a degree of egalitarian intragroup relationships. However, communal infrastructures, such as paddy field systems, defensive structures, and dolmens, indicate community-wide collaboration and the presence of managerial leadership. Furthermore, the significantly high Gini scores for pottery density demonstrate greater inter-household economic inequality, driven by factors such as craftsmanship. These observations collectively suggest that Mumun intra-settlement relationships were founded on principles of equality, with people collaborating to achieve common goals and benefits while seeking to accumulate wealth on a household basis. Overall, the settlement datasets indicate that Mumun social relations contained elements of both egalitarianism and increasing complexity, although the data do not indicate that intra-settlement social inequality intensified over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101679"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278416525000248","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines intra-settlement social inequality across 73 Mumun settlements (ca. 1500–1 BCE) on the southern Korean Peninsula using the Gini index and Lorenz curve. House size and pottery density are employed as proxies for socioeconomic power and the capacity for food storage and sharing, respectively. The analysis reveals a nuanced understanding of Mumun social complexity. Variations in house sizes show low Gini scores, suggesting a degree of egalitarian intragroup relationships. However, communal infrastructures, such as paddy field systems, defensive structures, and dolmens, indicate community-wide collaboration and the presence of managerial leadership. Furthermore, the significantly high Gini scores for pottery density demonstrate greater inter-household economic inequality, driven by factors such as craftsmanship. These observations collectively suggest that Mumun intra-settlement relationships were founded on principles of equality, with people collaborating to achieve common goals and benefits while seeking to accumulate wealth on a household basis. Overall, the settlement datasets indicate that Mumun social relations contained elements of both egalitarianism and increasing complexity, although the data do not indicate that intra-settlement social inequality intensified over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
史前朝鲜木门聚落的族群内部社会分化和家庭不平等
本研究使用基尼指数和洛伦兹曲线考察了朝鲜半岛南部73个木门聚落(约公元前1500-1年)的聚落内部社会不平等。房屋大小和陶器密度分别作为社会经济实力和食物储存和分享能力的代表。分析揭示了对木门社会复杂性的细致理解。房屋大小的差异显示出较低的基尼系数,这表明群体内部存在一定程度的平等主义关系。然而,公共基础设施,如水田系统、防御结构和石碑,表明社区范围内的合作和管理领导的存在。此外,陶器密度的显著高基尼系数表明,在工艺等因素的推动下,家庭间的经济不平等更大。这些观察结果共同表明,木门的定居关系是建立在平等原则的基础上的,人们合作实现共同的目标和利益,同时寻求以家庭为基础积累财富。总体而言,住区数据集表明,木门社会关系包含平均主义和日益复杂的因素,尽管数据并未表明住区内部社会不平等随着时间的推移而加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: An innovative, international publication, the Journal of Anthropological Archaeology is devoted to the development of theory and, in a broad sense, methodology for the systematic and rigorous understanding of the organization, operation, and evolution of human societies. The discipline served by the journal is characterized by its goals and approach, not by geographical or temporal bounds. The data utilized or treated range from the earliest archaeological evidence for the emergence of human culture to historically documented societies and the contemporary observations of the ethnographer, ethnoarchaeologist, sociologist, or geographer. These subjects appear in the journal as examples of cultural organization, operation, and evolution, not as specific historical phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Costly signaling with ceramic tablewares in Spanish colonial America Crafting a shared history of learning: Pottery making and the building of agropastoral communities (Argentina, 200-850 CE) Simplification of mortuary practices in the development of social complexity in Late Neolithic Middle Yangzi, China Secondary burial as evidence for alternative pathways to social complexity in Neolithic China: the Shixia case The many lives of companion species: a zooarchaeological and isotopic research on Wari dog remains from Castillo de Huarmey, Peru
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1