{"title":"Source ability is regulated by THOUSAND-GRAIN WEIGHT 6 in rice","authors":"Tatsuki Akabane , Shinichiro Kawawa , Masahiro Noguchi , Genki Horiguchi , Etsuko Katoh , Ken Ishimaru , Naoki Hirotsu","doi":"10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.109760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)-glucose hydrolase, THOUSAND-GRAIN WEIGHT 6 (TGW6), negatively regulates rice grain weight and starch accumulation before heading. A 1-bp deletion in <em>tgw6</em> results in loss of function and enhances grain size and yield. Thus, <em>TGW6</em> has been a target for breeding strains with increased rice yield. Although the effect of loss of <em>TGW6</em> function on sink size has been well understood, its impact on source ability (the ability to produce carbohydrates from leaves and supply to sink organs, referred to as shoot carbohydrate accumulation here) has been unclear. Here, we investigated the starch content of leaves, gene expression and carbohydrate translocation using cv. Koshihikari and a near-isogenic line carrying <em>tgw6</em> (NIL(<em>TGW6</em>)). We found that NIL(<em>TGW6</em>) accumulated more starch in lower leaf sheaths than cv. Koshihikari. Gene analysis of lower leaf sheaths from both lines indicated that the expression of starch synthesis-related genes was up-regulated, and those involved with starch degradation were down-regulated in the NIL(<em>TGW6</em>) line. Measurements of changes in carbohydrate accumulation indicated that the loss of <em>TGW6</em> function activated carbohydrate translocation and that starch accumulation in the leaf sheath contributed directly to the increase in starch uploaded to the panicles. These results provide new insights into <em>TGW6</em> function and how it affects the source ability of rice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20234,"journal":{"name":"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 109760"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0981942825002888","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)-glucose hydrolase, THOUSAND-GRAIN WEIGHT 6 (TGW6), negatively regulates rice grain weight and starch accumulation before heading. A 1-bp deletion in tgw6 results in loss of function and enhances grain size and yield. Thus, TGW6 has been a target for breeding strains with increased rice yield. Although the effect of loss of TGW6 function on sink size has been well understood, its impact on source ability (the ability to produce carbohydrates from leaves and supply to sink organs, referred to as shoot carbohydrate accumulation here) has been unclear. Here, we investigated the starch content of leaves, gene expression and carbohydrate translocation using cv. Koshihikari and a near-isogenic line carrying tgw6 (NIL(TGW6)). We found that NIL(TGW6) accumulated more starch in lower leaf sheaths than cv. Koshihikari. Gene analysis of lower leaf sheaths from both lines indicated that the expression of starch synthesis-related genes was up-regulated, and those involved with starch degradation were down-regulated in the NIL(TGW6) line. Measurements of changes in carbohydrate accumulation indicated that the loss of TGW6 function activated carbohydrate translocation and that starch accumulation in the leaf sheath contributed directly to the increase in starch uploaded to the panicles. These results provide new insights into TGW6 function and how it affects the source ability of rice.
期刊介绍:
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry publishes original theoretical, experimental and technical contributions in the various fields of plant physiology (biochemistry, physiology, structure, genetics, plant-microbe interactions, etc.) at diverse levels of integration (molecular, subcellular, cellular, organ, whole plant, environmental). Opinions expressed in the journal are the sole responsibility of the authors and publication does not imply the editors'' agreement.
Manuscripts describing molecular-genetic and/or gene expression data that are not integrated with biochemical analysis and/or actual measurements of plant physiological processes are not suitable for PPB. Also "Omics" studies (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc.) reporting descriptive analysis without an element of functional validation assays, will not be considered. Similarly, applied agronomic or phytochemical studies that generate no new, fundamental insights in plant physiological and/or biochemical processes are not suitable for publication in PPB.
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry publishes several types of articles: Reviews, Papers and Short Papers. Articles for Reviews are either invited by the editor or proposed by the authors for the editor''s prior agreement. Reviews should not exceed 40 typewritten pages and Short Papers no more than approximately 8 typewritten pages. The fundamental character of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry remains that of a journal for original results.