Beyond the 15-minute city dichotomy: Time-denominated access to essential services in Chicago

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-09 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104428
Alireza Ermagun , Fatemeh Janatabadi , Frank Witlox
{"title":"Beyond the 15-minute city dichotomy: Time-denominated access to essential services in Chicago","authors":"Alireza Ermagun ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Janatabadi ,&nbsp;Frank Witlox","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines social and spatial disparities in time-denominated access to employment opportunities, schools, parks, hospitals, grocery stores, and transit stations by walking, biking, and transit within the City of Chicago. It goes beyond the conventional 15-minute access dichotomy to recognize and understand the “where,” “what,” and “who” of access disparities in pursuit of equitable and sustainable urban environments. Five observations are discerned. First, 43% of Chicago is already within the 15-minute threshold, a proportion comparable to European cities (e.g., Helsinki, Berlin). Second, locations along major transit routes exhibit relatively longer travel times to access valued destinations. Third, Chicagoans have relatively greater access to employment opportunities and transit stations compared to grocery stores and hospitals. Fourth, there is a racial disparity in time-denominated access among racial minorities beyond the dichotomy of white and non-white. Fifth, disparities in access across generations are both detrimental and benign. The findings bring to the forefront multiple important considerations: (i) the 15-minute threshold is arbitrary, and its dichotomy obscures subtle disparities between areas; (ii) the definition of “essential services” is subjective and context dependent; (iii) not all essential services are prioritized equally when individuals and households choose residential locations; and (iv) access barriers extend beyond mobility and destination choices and may sometimes be rooted in social causes (e.g., safety concerns).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104428"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000564","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines social and spatial disparities in time-denominated access to employment opportunities, schools, parks, hospitals, grocery stores, and transit stations by walking, biking, and transit within the City of Chicago. It goes beyond the conventional 15-minute access dichotomy to recognize and understand the “where,” “what,” and “who” of access disparities in pursuit of equitable and sustainable urban environments. Five observations are discerned. First, 43% of Chicago is already within the 15-minute threshold, a proportion comparable to European cities (e.g., Helsinki, Berlin). Second, locations along major transit routes exhibit relatively longer travel times to access valued destinations. Third, Chicagoans have relatively greater access to employment opportunities and transit stations compared to grocery stores and hospitals. Fourth, there is a racial disparity in time-denominated access among racial minorities beyond the dichotomy of white and non-white. Fifth, disparities in access across generations are both detrimental and benign. The findings bring to the forefront multiple important considerations: (i) the 15-minute threshold is arbitrary, and its dichotomy obscures subtle disparities between areas; (ii) the definition of “essential services” is subjective and context dependent; (iii) not all essential services are prioritized equally when individuals and households choose residential locations; and (iv) access barriers extend beyond mobility and destination choices and may sometimes be rooted in social causes (e.g., safety concerns).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越城市的15分钟二分法:芝加哥的基本服务以时间为单位
本研究考察了芝加哥市内通过步行、骑自行车和公共交通获得就业机会、学校、公园、医院、杂货店和中转站的时间计算的社会和空间差异。它超越了传统的15分钟访问二分法,认识和理解“在哪里”,“什么”和“谁”的访问差异,以追求公平和可持续的城市环境。我们发现了五个现象。首先,芝加哥43%的地区已经在15分钟内,这一比例与欧洲城市(如赫尔辛基、柏林)相当。其次,沿着主要交通路线的地点,前往有价值的目的地的旅行时间相对较长。第三,与杂货店和医院相比,芝加哥人有更多的就业机会和中转站。第四,在白人和非白人的二分法之外,少数民族在以时间为单位的准入方面存在种族差异。第五,代际间获取机会的差距既有害又有益。研究结果提出了多个重要的考虑:(i) 15分钟的阈值是任意的,它的二分法掩盖了区域之间的微妙差异;(ii)“基本服务”的定义是主观的,视情况而定;(iii)个人和家庭在选择居住地点时,并非所有基本服务都同等优先;(四)准入障碍超出了流动性和目的地选择的范畴,有时可能源于社会原因(例如安全问题)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Autonomous vehicles in the public eye: A global social media analysis for smarter policies How are objective and perceived walkability associated with the health of older adults through walking behavior? Dynamic effect of subway expansion on the spatial and temporal distribution of road congestion The Relative Index of Metropolisation of the Territory: Quantifying spatial reorganisation driven by land-based transport Would you feel good sitting there? Psychological stress and social control in public transportation priority seating
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1