Alireza Ermagun , Fatemeh Janatabadi , Frank Witlox
{"title":"Beyond the 15-minute city dichotomy: Time-denominated access to essential services in Chicago","authors":"Alireza Ermagun , Fatemeh Janatabadi , Frank Witlox","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines social and spatial disparities in time-denominated access to employment opportunities, schools, parks, hospitals, grocery stores, and transit stations by walking, biking, and transit within the City of Chicago. It goes beyond the conventional 15-minute access dichotomy to recognize and understand the “where,” “what,” and “who” of access disparities in pursuit of equitable and sustainable urban environments. Five observations are discerned. First, 43% of Chicago is already within the 15-minute threshold, a proportion comparable to European cities (e.g., Helsinki, Berlin). Second, locations along major transit routes exhibit relatively longer travel times to access valued destinations. Third, Chicagoans have relatively greater access to employment opportunities and transit stations compared to grocery stores and hospitals. Fourth, there is a racial disparity in time-denominated access among racial minorities beyond the dichotomy of white and non-white. Fifth, disparities in access across generations are both detrimental and benign. The findings bring to the forefront multiple important considerations: (i) the 15-minute threshold is arbitrary, and its dichotomy obscures subtle disparities between areas; (ii) the definition of “essential services” is subjective and context dependent; (iii) not all essential services are prioritized equally when individuals and households choose residential locations; and (iv) access barriers extend beyond mobility and destination choices and may sometimes be rooted in social causes (e.g., safety concerns).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104428"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000564","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines social and spatial disparities in time-denominated access to employment opportunities, schools, parks, hospitals, grocery stores, and transit stations by walking, biking, and transit within the City of Chicago. It goes beyond the conventional 15-minute access dichotomy to recognize and understand the “where,” “what,” and “who” of access disparities in pursuit of equitable and sustainable urban environments. Five observations are discerned. First, 43% of Chicago is already within the 15-minute threshold, a proportion comparable to European cities (e.g., Helsinki, Berlin). Second, locations along major transit routes exhibit relatively longer travel times to access valued destinations. Third, Chicagoans have relatively greater access to employment opportunities and transit stations compared to grocery stores and hospitals. Fourth, there is a racial disparity in time-denominated access among racial minorities beyond the dichotomy of white and non-white. Fifth, disparities in access across generations are both detrimental and benign. The findings bring to the forefront multiple important considerations: (i) the 15-minute threshold is arbitrary, and its dichotomy obscures subtle disparities between areas; (ii) the definition of “essential services” is subjective and context dependent; (iii) not all essential services are prioritized equally when individuals and households choose residential locations; and (iv) access barriers extend beyond mobility and destination choices and may sometimes be rooted in social causes (e.g., safety concerns).
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.