Jane B. Allendorfer , Adam M. Goodman , M. David Diggs , Caroline G. Byington , Rodolphe Nenert , Gabriella C. Taylor , Krista Tocco , Rachel Underwood , Stephen Correia , W. Curt LaFrance Jr. , Jerzy P. Szaflarski
{"title":"Repeatability of facial emotion processing over 12 weeks in healthy participants","authors":"Jane B. Allendorfer , Adam M. Goodman , M. David Diggs , Caroline G. Byington , Rodolphe Nenert , Gabriella C. Taylor , Krista Tocco , Rachel Underwood , Stephen Correia , W. Curt LaFrance Jr. , Jerzy P. Szaflarski","doi":"10.1016/j.bandc.2025.106283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Few studies have assessed influences of mood state on facial emotion processing changes. We examined if the repeatability of fMRI facial emotional processing in healthy participants (HCs) is affected by mood state changes and hypothesized that fMRI activation would be stable but may be influenced by mood state fluctuations. In a multi-site study, thirty-two HCs underwent emotion faces task (EFT) fMRI and completed a post-scan facial emotion rating and the Profile of Mood States (POMS) ∼ 12 weeks apart. FMRI data were processed using AFNI software. POMS and behavioral data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and the sign test, as appropriate. Paired-samples t-tests, covarying for site, assessed fMRI responses for facial emotions (Happy, Fearful, Sad, Neutral) and Arousal. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) examined repeatability of POMS and fMRI responses; regression analyses examined relationships between mood changes and fMRI activations. There were no significant differences between visits in POMS, EFT performance or post-scan ratings accuracy. POMS scores were stable (ICC ≥ 0.74). FMRI activation exhibited repeatability that was fair or better (ICC ≥ 0.4). EFT activation changes were not significantly related to mood state changes. Our results provide evidence for acceptable EFT fMRI test–retest reliability over 12 weeks, without significant influence of mood state variability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55331,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Cognition","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 106283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262625000235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Few studies have assessed influences of mood state on facial emotion processing changes. We examined if the repeatability of fMRI facial emotional processing in healthy participants (HCs) is affected by mood state changes and hypothesized that fMRI activation would be stable but may be influenced by mood state fluctuations. In a multi-site study, thirty-two HCs underwent emotion faces task (EFT) fMRI and completed a post-scan facial emotion rating and the Profile of Mood States (POMS) ∼ 12 weeks apart. FMRI data were processed using AFNI software. POMS and behavioral data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and the sign test, as appropriate. Paired-samples t-tests, covarying for site, assessed fMRI responses for facial emotions (Happy, Fearful, Sad, Neutral) and Arousal. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) examined repeatability of POMS and fMRI responses; regression analyses examined relationships between mood changes and fMRI activations. There were no significant differences between visits in POMS, EFT performance or post-scan ratings accuracy. POMS scores were stable (ICC ≥ 0.74). FMRI activation exhibited repeatability that was fair or better (ICC ≥ 0.4). EFT activation changes were not significantly related to mood state changes. Our results provide evidence for acceptable EFT fMRI test–retest reliability over 12 weeks, without significant influence of mood state variability.
期刊介绍:
Brain and Cognition is a forum for the integration of the neurosciences and cognitive sciences. B&C publishes peer-reviewed research articles, theoretical papers, case histories that address important theoretical issues, and historical articles into the interaction between cognitive function and brain processes. The focus is on rigorous studies of an empirical or theoretical nature and which make an original contribution to our knowledge about the involvement of the nervous system in cognition. Coverage includes, but is not limited to memory, learning, emotion, perception, movement, music or praxis in relationship to brain structure or function. Published articles will typically address issues relating some aspect of cognitive function to its neurological substrates with clear theoretical import, formulating new hypotheses or refuting previously established hypotheses. Clinical papers are welcome if they raise issues of theoretical importance or concern and shed light on the interaction between brain function and cognitive function. We welcome review articles that clearly contribute a new perspective or integration, beyond summarizing the literature in the field; authors of review articles should make explicit where the contribution lies. We also welcome proposals for special issues on aspects of the relation between cognition and the structure and function of the nervous system. Such proposals can be made directly to the Editor-in-Chief from individuals interested in being guest editors for such collections.