Probabilistic resilience assessment of structures considering the functional uncertainty: A case study for external prestressed subframe in strengthening

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-09 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119968
Xu-Yang Cao , De-Cheng Feng
{"title":"Probabilistic resilience assessment of structures considering the functional uncertainty: A case study for external prestressed subframe in strengthening","authors":"Xu-Yang Cao ,&nbsp;De-Cheng Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seismic resilience is a critical index in the earthquake engineering. In recent years, it has received extensive attention and has been broadly used in post-earthquake assessments, especially for the structures after strengthening. At this stage, the seismic resilience is commonly analyzed using deterministic approaches, while the corresponding probabilistic resilience assessment still needs further research. In this paper, a probabilistic resilience assessment framework of structures considering the functional uncertainty is proposed, and a case study for external prestressed subframe in seismic strengthening is performed. The probabilistic resilience assessment framework consists of the probabilistic analyses of fragility, expected loss, residual functionality, recovery time and resilience index, and the resilience developments along with the intensity level or recovery time are detailedly discussed in the procedure. Subsequently, an implementary example of the existing frame strengthened by an external prestressed subframe is given, and the proposed probabilistic resilience assessment framework is performed for comprehensive analyses. In general, the functionality varying with recovery time presents significant uncertainty for each scenario and intensity level, which proves the necessity of resilience analyses in a probabilistic way. With the increase of prestress level, the obtained mean resilience index increases, and the resilience exceeding probability curves move upward for all the conditions, which signifies the superiority of a higher prestress level to increase the seismic resilience and to improve the risk-resistant capacity in external strengthening. In a sense, the probabilistic resilience assessment framework evaluates the resilience development from an uncertain perspective, which provides a significant reference for the subsequent probabilistic risk analyses in engineering structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 119968"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625003591","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seismic resilience is a critical index in the earthquake engineering. In recent years, it has received extensive attention and has been broadly used in post-earthquake assessments, especially for the structures after strengthening. At this stage, the seismic resilience is commonly analyzed using deterministic approaches, while the corresponding probabilistic resilience assessment still needs further research. In this paper, a probabilistic resilience assessment framework of structures considering the functional uncertainty is proposed, and a case study for external prestressed subframe in seismic strengthening is performed. The probabilistic resilience assessment framework consists of the probabilistic analyses of fragility, expected loss, residual functionality, recovery time and resilience index, and the resilience developments along with the intensity level or recovery time are detailedly discussed in the procedure. Subsequently, an implementary example of the existing frame strengthened by an external prestressed subframe is given, and the proposed probabilistic resilience assessment framework is performed for comprehensive analyses. In general, the functionality varying with recovery time presents significant uncertainty for each scenario and intensity level, which proves the necessity of resilience analyses in a probabilistic way. With the increase of prestress level, the obtained mean resilience index increases, and the resilience exceeding probability curves move upward for all the conditions, which signifies the superiority of a higher prestress level to increase the seismic resilience and to improve the risk-resistant capacity in external strengthening. In a sense, the probabilistic resilience assessment framework evaluates the resilience development from an uncertain perspective, which provides a significant reference for the subsequent probabilistic risk analyses in engineering structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑功能不确定性的结构概率回弹评估:以外预应力副框架加固为例
抗震回弹是抗震工程中的一项重要指标。近年来,它受到了广泛的关注,并在震后评估中得到了广泛的应用,特别是对加固后的结构。现阶段,一般采用确定性方法进行地震恢复力分析,而相应的概率恢复力评估仍需进一步研究。本文提出了考虑功能不确定性的结构概率回弹评估框架,并对外预应力副框架进行了抗震加固实例研究。概率恢复力评估框架包括脆弱性、预期损失、剩余功能、恢复时间和恢复力指数的概率分析,并详细讨论了恢复力随强度水平或恢复时间的发展。在此基础上,给出了现有框架加外预应力副框架加固的实例,并对所提出的概率回弹评估框架进行了综合分析。一般情况下,随恢复时间变化的功能对每个场景和强度水平都具有显著的不确定性,这证明了以概率方式进行弹性分析的必要性。随着预应力水平的增加,得到的平均回弹性指数增大,各工况回弹性超概率曲线均上移,说明较高的预应力水平在增加抗震回弹性和提高外加固抗风险能力方面具有优势。从某种意义上说,概率弹性评估框架从不确定的角度对弹性发展进行了评价,为后续工程结构概率风险分析提供了重要参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Seismic performance of a novel prefabricated RC column-H steel beam joint: Testing, modelling and design Crack propagation in honeycomb structures under thermal shock using Lord-Shulman theory Fatigue bond behavior between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete and high-strength steel bars A theoretical model for circular concrete filled steel tubes under compression considering the effect of stress path Spaceborne-InSAR monitoring framework for large-span spatial structures based on temperature-based structural identification theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1