Experimental study of different fiber composites used to repair damaged coal gangue sintered brick masonry panels: Diagonal compression and cyclic shear compression behavior

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120112
Fenghao Qu , Shiping Yin , Huarui Liu
{"title":"Experimental study of different fiber composites used to repair damaged coal gangue sintered brick masonry panels: Diagonal compression and cyclic shear compression behavior","authors":"Fenghao Qu ,&nbsp;Shiping Yin ,&nbsp;Huarui Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fiber-reinforced composites represent one of the most effective technologies for seismic protection and post-earthquake damaged masonry structures in regions prone to seismic activity. However, existing masonry structures and post-earthquake damaged masonry structures may experience damage of varying severity, which seriously affects the effectiveness of fiber-reinforced composites. To elucidate the mechanisms through which various fiber composites enhance the shear and seismic resilience of damaged walls, comprehensive in-plane diagonal compression and cyclic shear tests were conducted on both masonry walls and confined masonry (CM) walls retrofitted with fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), textile-reinforced concrete (TRC), and engineered cementitious composites (ECC). An analysis revealed that unreinforced and mortar-reinforced walls exhibited significant brittleness upon failure. In contrast, FRPs, TRCs, and ECCs considerably improved deformability while delaying the onset of cracking and stiffness deterioration. The efficiency of the FRP in enhancing the shear strength was slightly superior to that of the other two materials, whereas the ECC and TRC had comparable effects on improving the shear strength. Among the reinforced samples, those strengthened with ECCs presented the best ductility and energy dissipation capacity, whereas the FRP-reinforced samples presented the lowest ductility. The performance of the TRC-strengthened samples fell between those of the other samples. The investigation of diagonal compression revealed that the reinforced walls demonstrated significant enhancements in shear stress, initial stiffness, ductility, and energy dissipation compared to unreinforced walls, with improvements ranging from 19.9 % to 44.1 %, 8.1 %-30.5 %, 39.7 %-185.2 %, and 142.1 %-558.2 %, respectively. Additionally, in the context of cyclic shear compression, the reinforced walls exhibited improvements in peak load, ductility, and energy dissipation by 3.4 %-22.1 %, 24.5 %-100 %, and 66.9 %-180.8 %, respectively. Severely damaged CM walls reinforced with TRC and ECC met the requisite stability requirements under “large earthquakes,” whereas FRPs ensured stability only under moderate earthquakes. Pre-damaged CM walls reinforced with ECCs, TRCs, and FRPs can guarantee stability under conditions of large, moderate, and minor earthquakes, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 120112"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625005036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced composites represent one of the most effective technologies for seismic protection and post-earthquake damaged masonry structures in regions prone to seismic activity. However, existing masonry structures and post-earthquake damaged masonry structures may experience damage of varying severity, which seriously affects the effectiveness of fiber-reinforced composites. To elucidate the mechanisms through which various fiber composites enhance the shear and seismic resilience of damaged walls, comprehensive in-plane diagonal compression and cyclic shear tests were conducted on both masonry walls and confined masonry (CM) walls retrofitted with fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), textile-reinforced concrete (TRC), and engineered cementitious composites (ECC). An analysis revealed that unreinforced and mortar-reinforced walls exhibited significant brittleness upon failure. In contrast, FRPs, TRCs, and ECCs considerably improved deformability while delaying the onset of cracking and stiffness deterioration. The efficiency of the FRP in enhancing the shear strength was slightly superior to that of the other two materials, whereas the ECC and TRC had comparable effects on improving the shear strength. Among the reinforced samples, those strengthened with ECCs presented the best ductility and energy dissipation capacity, whereas the FRP-reinforced samples presented the lowest ductility. The performance of the TRC-strengthened samples fell between those of the other samples. The investigation of diagonal compression revealed that the reinforced walls demonstrated significant enhancements in shear stress, initial stiffness, ductility, and energy dissipation compared to unreinforced walls, with improvements ranging from 19.9 % to 44.1 %, 8.1 %-30.5 %, 39.7 %-185.2 %, and 142.1 %-558.2 %, respectively. Additionally, in the context of cyclic shear compression, the reinforced walls exhibited improvements in peak load, ductility, and energy dissipation by 3.4 %-22.1 %, 24.5 %-100 %, and 66.9 %-180.8 %, respectively. Severely damaged CM walls reinforced with TRC and ECC met the requisite stability requirements under “large earthquakes,” whereas FRPs ensured stability only under moderate earthquakes. Pre-damaged CM walls reinforced with ECCs, TRCs, and FRPs can guarantee stability under conditions of large, moderate, and minor earthquakes, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Experimental study of different fiber composites used to repair damaged coal gangue sintered brick masonry panels: Diagonal compression and cyclic shear compression behavior Quasi-static testing of rocking piers for railway bridges Simulated field assembly bending experiment and mechanical model of sink-insert joints for prefabricated two-wall-in-one diaphragm walls Flexural behaviors of GFRP-reinforced Engineered Cementitious Composite (ECC)-concrete composite beams Fatigue behavior of CFRP-strengthened butt-welded high-strength steel connections with surface cracks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1