Regulatory plasticity of the human genome.

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Molecular biology and evolution Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1093/molbev/msaf050
Jaya Srivastava, Ivan Ovcharenko
{"title":"Regulatory plasticity of the human genome.","authors":"Jaya Srivastava, Ivan Ovcharenko","doi":"10.1093/molbev/msaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evolutionary turnover in non-coding regions has driven phenotypic divergence during past speciation events and continues to facilitate environmental adaptation through variants. We used a deep learning model to identify the substrates of regulatory turnover using genome wide mutations mimicking three evolutionary pathways: recent history (human-chimp substitutions), modern population (human population variation), and mutational susceptibility (random mutations). We observed enhancer turnover in approximately 6% of the whole genome, with more than 80% of the novel activity arising from repurposing of enhancers between cell-types. Frequency of turnover in a cell-type is remarkably similar across the three pathways, despite only ∼19% overlap in the source regions. The majority of turnover loci were found to be localized within 100kb of a gene, with the highest turnover occurring near neurodevelopmental genes including CNTNAP2, NPAS3, and AUTS2. Flanking enhancers of these genes undergo high turnover irrespective of the mutational model pathway, suggesting a high plasticity in neurocognitive evolution. Based on susceptibility to random mutations, these enhancers were identified as vulnerable by nature and feature a higher abundance of cell type-specific transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs). Our findings suggest that enhancer repurposing within vulnerable loci drives regulatory innovation while keeping the core regulatory networks intact.</p>","PeriodicalId":18730,"journal":{"name":"Molecular biology and evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular biology and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf050","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evolutionary turnover in non-coding regions has driven phenotypic divergence during past speciation events and continues to facilitate environmental adaptation through variants. We used a deep learning model to identify the substrates of regulatory turnover using genome wide mutations mimicking three evolutionary pathways: recent history (human-chimp substitutions), modern population (human population variation), and mutational susceptibility (random mutations). We observed enhancer turnover in approximately 6% of the whole genome, with more than 80% of the novel activity arising from repurposing of enhancers between cell-types. Frequency of turnover in a cell-type is remarkably similar across the three pathways, despite only ∼19% overlap in the source regions. The majority of turnover loci were found to be localized within 100kb of a gene, with the highest turnover occurring near neurodevelopmental genes including CNTNAP2, NPAS3, and AUTS2. Flanking enhancers of these genes undergo high turnover irrespective of the mutational model pathway, suggesting a high plasticity in neurocognitive evolution. Based on susceptibility to random mutations, these enhancers were identified as vulnerable by nature and feature a higher abundance of cell type-specific transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs). Our findings suggest that enhancer repurposing within vulnerable loci drives regulatory innovation while keeping the core regulatory networks intact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular biology and evolution
Molecular biology and evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
19.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
257
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Biology and Evolution Journal Overview: Publishes research at the interface of molecular (including genomics) and evolutionary biology Considers manuscripts containing patterns, processes, and predictions at all levels of organization: population, taxonomic, functional, and phenotypic Interested in fundamental discoveries, new and improved methods, resources, technologies, and theories advancing evolutionary research Publishes balanced reviews of recent developments in genome evolution and forward-looking perspectives suggesting future directions in molecular evolution applications.
期刊最新文献
Regulatory plasticity of the human genome. Misspecification Strikes: ASTRAL can Mislead in the Presence of Hybridization, even for Non-Anomalous Scenarios. What Do We Gain When Tolerating Loss? The Information Bottleneck Wrings Out Recombination. Genetic Mechanisms and Adaptive Benefits of Anthocyanin Red Stigmas in a Wind-Pollinated Tree. A Tale of Too Many Trees: A Conundrum for Phylogenetic Regression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1