Satellite-Derived Productivity Outputs for Land Degradation Assessment Vary With Biome and Rainfall

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Land Degradation & Development Pub Date : 2025-03-09 DOI:10.1002/ldr.5541
Colleen L. Seymour, Dylan Seaton, Sediqa Khatieb, Nthabiseng Letsatsi, Andrew Skowno, Wataru Tokura, Stephni van der Merwe, Vernon Visser, Graham von Maltitz
{"title":"Satellite-Derived Productivity Outputs for Land Degradation Assessment Vary With Biome and Rainfall","authors":"Colleen L. Seymour,&nbsp;Dylan Seaton,&nbsp;Sediqa Khatieb,&nbsp;Nthabiseng Letsatsi,&nbsp;Andrew Skowno,&nbsp;Wataru Tokura,&nbsp;Stephni van der Merwe,&nbsp;Vernon Visser,&nbsp;Graham von Maltitz","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Estimates of the extent of land degradation vary dramatically. To quantify the extent and location of land degradation globally, the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) asks member countries to report on land degradation every four years, providing crucial baseline and change data. Finding remotely sensed products that best capture degradation is central to this reporting. Here, we compare assessments for South Africa's Trajectory of Land Productivity using the Trends.Earth tool, which allows use of various remotely sensed data and climate inputs (Land Productivity Degradation Models, LPDMs). These differ in how they account for precipitation, allowing countries to choose the most appropriate for their context. We compare extent and location of degraded, stable or improved Productivity indicator pixels as identified by five different LPDMs for the country over the UNCCD 2022 reporting period (2016–2019), and whether this varied with biome. The LPDMs differed in percentage of area identified as degraded. The most pessimistic identified 35% degraded and 4% improved, the most optimistic, 15% as degraded, and &gt; 70% improved. LPDMs also differed in where degradation was identified. Models that account for rainfall were more likely to classify a location favorably than those that did not account for rainfall, particularly in shrubland biomes. South Africa's Grasslands were less likely than other biomes to be classified as degraded. Between 59%–78% of the country's area experienced drought over the reporting period, which may have accentuated differences between LPDM outputs. Mapping and monitoring degradation over space and time is crucial; to achieve this, all LPDM outputs should be carefully assessed by ecologists with a working knowledge of the landscapes of interest, supported by field validation data. This approach ensures that the most suitable remotely sensed models are used in national monitoring and reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"36 9","pages":"2913-2927"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ldr.5541","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.5541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimates of the extent of land degradation vary dramatically. To quantify the extent and location of land degradation globally, the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) asks member countries to report on land degradation every four years, providing crucial baseline and change data. Finding remotely sensed products that best capture degradation is central to this reporting. Here, we compare assessments for South Africa's Trajectory of Land Productivity using the Trends.Earth tool, which allows use of various remotely sensed data and climate inputs (Land Productivity Degradation Models, LPDMs). These differ in how they account for precipitation, allowing countries to choose the most appropriate for their context. We compare extent and location of degraded, stable or improved Productivity indicator pixels as identified by five different LPDMs for the country over the UNCCD 2022 reporting period (2016–2019), and whether this varied with biome. The LPDMs differed in percentage of area identified as degraded. The most pessimistic identified 35% degraded and 4% improved, the most optimistic, 15% as degraded, and > 70% improved. LPDMs also differed in where degradation was identified. Models that account for rainfall were more likely to classify a location favorably than those that did not account for rainfall, particularly in shrubland biomes. South Africa's Grasslands were less likely than other biomes to be classified as degraded. Between 59%–78% of the country's area experienced drought over the reporting period, which may have accentuated differences between LPDM outputs. Mapping and monitoring degradation over space and time is crucial; to achieve this, all LPDM outputs should be carefully assessed by ecologists with a working knowledge of the landscapes of interest, supported by field validation data. This approach ensures that the most suitable remotely sensed models are used in national monitoring and reporting.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于土地退化评估的卫星导出的生产力产出随生物群系和降雨而变化
对土地退化程度的估计差别很大。为了量化全球土地退化的程度和地点,《联合国防治荒漠化公约》(UNCCD)要求成员国每四年报告一次土地退化情况,提供关键的基线和变化数据。寻找最能捕获降解的遥感产品是本报告的核心。在这里,我们使用趋势对南非土地生产力轨迹的评估进行了比较。地球工具,它允许使用各种遥感数据和气候输入(土地生产力退化模型,LPDMs)。这些方法的不同之处在于它们如何计算降水,从而使各国能够根据其具体情况选择最合适的方法。我们比较了该国在《联合国防治荒漠化公约》2022年报告期间(2016-2019年)由五个不同的LPDMs确定的退化、稳定或改善的生产力指标像素的程度和位置,以及这是否因生物群落而异。LPDMs在被确定为退化的面积百分比方面存在差异。最悲观的人认为35%的环境退化了,4%的环境改善了;最乐观的人认为15%的环境退化了,70%的环境改善了。LPDMs在识别降解的位置上也存在差异。考虑降雨的模型比不考虑降雨的模型更有可能对一个地点进行有利的分类,特别是在灌木群落中。与其他生物群落相比,南非的草原被归类为退化的可能性较小。在报告所述期间,该国59%-78%的地区经历了干旱,这可能加剧了LPDM产出之间的差异。绘制和监测空间和时间上的退化情况至关重要;为了实现这一目标,所有的LPDM输出都应该由生态学家仔细评估,他们对感兴趣的景观有工作知识,并得到实地验证数据的支持。这种方法确保在国家监测和报告中使用最合适的遥感模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
期刊最新文献
Ecosystem Deterioration, Adaptation Pathways and Resilience Under Inclusive Land Governance in Degraded Chinese Landscapes Microplastics Type and Size Influence Soil Respiration by Mediating Root Biomass in Cultivated Agricultural Ecosystem, N orth C hina Morphodynamic Evolution of Ephemeral Gullies in Black Soil Regions: Laboratory Observations Using SfM Photogrammetry Estimating Soil Compaction Risk at Regional Scales Using Meteorological Data and Soil Spectroscopy Reclaimed Well Sites on Salt Affected Soils: Electrical Conductivity and Sodium Adsorption Ratio as Plant Community Response Indicators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1