Pelabresib plus ruxolitinib for JAK inhibitor-naive myelofibrosis: a randomized phase 3 trial

IF 50 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Nature Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1038/s41591-025-03572-3
Raajit K. Rampal, Sebastian Grosicki, Dominik Chraniuk, Elisabetta Abruzzese, Prithviraj Bose, Aaron T. Gerds, Alessandro M. Vannucchi, Francesca Palandri, Sung-Eun Lee, Vikas Gupta, Alessandro Lucchesi, Stephen T. Oh, Andrew T. Kuykendall, Andrea Patriarca, Alberto Álvarez-Larrán, Ruben Mesa, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Moshe Talpaz, Joseph M. Scandura, David Lavie, Morgan Harris, Sarah-Katharina Kays, Qing Li, Rainer Boxhammer, Barbara Brown, Anna-Maria Jegg, Claire N. Harrison, John Mascarenhas
{"title":"Pelabresib plus ruxolitinib for JAK inhibitor-naive myelofibrosis: a randomized phase 3 trial","authors":"Raajit K. Rampal, Sebastian Grosicki, Dominik Chraniuk, Elisabetta Abruzzese, Prithviraj Bose, Aaron T. Gerds, Alessandro M. Vannucchi, Francesca Palandri, Sung-Eun Lee, Vikas Gupta, Alessandro Lucchesi, Stephen T. Oh, Andrew T. Kuykendall, Andrea Patriarca, Alberto Álvarez-Larrán, Ruben Mesa, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Moshe Talpaz, Joseph M. Scandura, David Lavie, Morgan Harris, Sarah-Katharina Kays, Qing Li, Rainer Boxhammer, Barbara Brown, Anna-Maria Jegg, Claire N. Harrison, John Mascarenhas","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03572-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors provide limited depth and durability of response in myelofibrosis. We evaluated pelabresib—a bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitor—plus ruxolitinib (a JAK inhibitor) compared with placebo plus ruxolitinib as first-line therapy. In this phase 3 study (MANIFEST-2), JAK inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis were randomized 1:1 to pelabresib 125 mg once daily (QD; 50–175 mg QD permitted) for 14 days followed by a 7-day break (21-day cycle), or to placebo in combination with ruxolitinib 10 or 15 mg twice daily (BID; 5 mg QD–25 mg BID permitted). Primary endpoint was reduction in spleen volume of ≥35% from baseline at week 24. Key secondary endpoints were absolute change in total symptom score (TSS) and TSS50 response (≥50% reduction in TSS from baseline at week 24). The primary endpoint was met in 65.9% of patients randomized to pelabresib–ruxolitinib (n = 214) versus 35.2% to placebo–ruxolitinib (n = 216) (difference, 30.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 21.6, 39.3; P < 0.001). Absolute change in TSS was −15.99 versus −14.05 (difference, −1.94; 95% CI, −3.92, 0.04; P = 0.0545) and TSS50 was achieved in 52.3% versus 46.3% (difference, 6.0%; 95 CI, −3.5, 15.5) with pelabresib–ruxolitinib versus placebo–ruxolitinib. Exploratory analyses of proinflammatory cytokine amounts and bone marrow morphology showed greater improvement with the combination. Thrombocytopenia and anemia were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events, occurring in 52.8% (13.2% grade ≥3) versus 37.4% (6.1% grade ≥3) and 44.8% (23.1% grade ≥3) versus 55.1% (36.5% grade ≥3), respectively. Pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib is well tolerated, improves signs of underlying myelofibrosis pathobiology and provides substantial clinical benefit over standard-of-care JAK inhibitor monotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04603495 . In a randomized phase 3 trial, the combination of the BET inhibitor pelabresib with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib resulted in a significantly higher spleen volume reduction from baseline versus placebo with ruxolitinib in patients with JAK inhibitor-naive myelofibrosis.","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"31 5","pages":"1531-1538"},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-03572-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-03572-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors provide limited depth and durability of response in myelofibrosis. We evaluated pelabresib—a bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitor—plus ruxolitinib (a JAK inhibitor) compared with placebo plus ruxolitinib as first-line therapy. In this phase 3 study (MANIFEST-2), JAK inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis were randomized 1:1 to pelabresib 125 mg once daily (QD; 50–175 mg QD permitted) for 14 days followed by a 7-day break (21-day cycle), or to placebo in combination with ruxolitinib 10 or 15 mg twice daily (BID; 5 mg QD–25 mg BID permitted). Primary endpoint was reduction in spleen volume of ≥35% from baseline at week 24. Key secondary endpoints were absolute change in total symptom score (TSS) and TSS50 response (≥50% reduction in TSS from baseline at week 24). The primary endpoint was met in 65.9% of patients randomized to pelabresib–ruxolitinib (n = 214) versus 35.2% to placebo–ruxolitinib (n = 216) (difference, 30.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 21.6, 39.3; P < 0.001). Absolute change in TSS was −15.99 versus −14.05 (difference, −1.94; 95% CI, −3.92, 0.04; P = 0.0545) and TSS50 was achieved in 52.3% versus 46.3% (difference, 6.0%; 95 CI, −3.5, 15.5) with pelabresib–ruxolitinib versus placebo–ruxolitinib. Exploratory analyses of proinflammatory cytokine amounts and bone marrow morphology showed greater improvement with the combination. Thrombocytopenia and anemia were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events, occurring in 52.8% (13.2% grade ≥3) versus 37.4% (6.1% grade ≥3) and 44.8% (23.1% grade ≥3) versus 55.1% (36.5% grade ≥3), respectively. Pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib is well tolerated, improves signs of underlying myelofibrosis pathobiology and provides substantial clinical benefit over standard-of-care JAK inhibitor monotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04603495 . In a randomized phase 3 trial, the combination of the BET inhibitor pelabresib with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib resulted in a significantly higher spleen volume reduction from baseline versus placebo with ruxolitinib in patients with JAK inhibitor-naive myelofibrosis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pelabresib联合ruxolitinib治疗JAK抑制剂-初始骨髓纤维化:一项随机3期试验
Janus激酶(JAK)抑制剂在骨髓纤维化中提供有限的深度和持久性反应。我们评估了pelabresibb(溴域和外域(BET)抑制剂)+ ruxolitinib (JAK抑制剂)与安慰剂+ ruxolitinib作为一线治疗的比较。在这项3期研究(MANIFEST-2)中,未使用JAK抑制剂的骨髓纤维化患者以1:1的比例随机分配至每天一次125 mg的pelabresib (QD;50-175 mg QD允许),连续14天,然后休息7天(21天周期),或安慰剂联合ruxolitinib 10或15 mg,每日两次(BID;5mg qd - 25mg BID允许)。主要终点是脾体积在第24周较基线减少≥35%。关键次要终点是总症状评分(TSS)和TSS50反应的绝对变化(第24周时TSS较基线降低≥50%)。主要终点达到65.9%的患者随机分配到pelabresibb - ruxolitinib组(n = 214),而35.2%的患者随机分配到安慰剂- ruxolitinib组(n = 216)(差异30.4%;95%置信区间(CI), 21.6, 39.3;P < 0.001)。TSS的绝对变化为- 15.99 vs - 14.05(差异为- 1.94;95% ci,−3.92,0.04;P = 0.0545),达到TSS50的比例为52.3%对46.3%(差异6.0%;pelabresab - ruxolitinib组与安慰剂- ruxolitinib组的CI为95,- 3.5,15.5)。探索性分析显示,促炎细胞因子的数量和骨髓形态有更大的改善。血小板减少和贫血是最常见的治疗不良事件,发生率分别为52.8%(13.2%分级≥3)对37.4%(6.1%分级≥3)和44.8%(23.1%分级≥3)对55.1%(36.5%分级≥3)。Pelabresib联合ruxolitinib耐受性良好,改善了潜在骨髓纤维化病理生物学的迹象,并且比标准护理JAK抑制剂单药治疗提供了实质性的临床益处。ClinicalTrials.gov识别码:NCT04603495。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
DASH-patterned groceries and effects on blood pressure in adults treated for hypertension: the GoFreshRx randomized trial. Gotistobart or docetaxel in metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer: stage 1 of the randomized phase 3 PRESERVE-003 trial. Time-restricted eating for body weight management in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Publisher Correction: Clinical development of cancer vaccines. In vivo generation of anti-BCMA CAR-T cells in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1 study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1