Modernizing higher education with industrial forces in Asia: a comparative study of discourse of university-industry collaboration in China, Japan and Singapore

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Asia Pacific Education Review Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1007/s12564-024-10033-y
Tengteng Zhuang, Misao Oh, Keiko Kimura
{"title":"Modernizing higher education with industrial forces in Asia: a comparative study of discourse of university-industry collaboration in China, Japan and Singapore","authors":"Tengteng Zhuang,&nbsp;Misao Oh,&nbsp;Keiko Kimura","doi":"10.1007/s12564-024-10033-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>University-industry collaboration (UIC) has emerged as a focal point in the contemporary global higher education landscape. Nevertheless, the underlying objectives for endorsing UIC often vary across national contexts despite a consensus on its collective benefits. This study endeavors to juxtapose the social imaginary surrounding UIC within three economically vigorous Asian countries: China, Japan, and Singapore through a multimodal discourse analysis. Findings reveal a consonant priority placed on the role of UIC as an innovation driver in all three contexts. However, whereas China has exhibited a pronounced tendency to harness industry sector dynamics to reform pedagogical frameworks within its higher educational institutions and promote economic development, Japan’s approach to UIC is more motivated by the intention to maintain international competitiveness and address societal challenges peculiar to the nation. Meanwhile, Singapore places research collaboration and internationalization at the heart of its UIC agenda and highlights them as the key factors driving its leadership in global cutting-edge technology. Practical implications for governments include placing equal emphasis on both education-focused and research-oriented UIC, fostering stronger R&amp;D collaboration frameworks between universities and industries, designing policies that promote cross-sectoral trust-building, and aligning long-term goals with the more immediate needs of the industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47344,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Education Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"195 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-024-10033-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

University-industry collaboration (UIC) has emerged as a focal point in the contemporary global higher education landscape. Nevertheless, the underlying objectives for endorsing UIC often vary across national contexts despite a consensus on its collective benefits. This study endeavors to juxtapose the social imaginary surrounding UIC within three economically vigorous Asian countries: China, Japan, and Singapore through a multimodal discourse analysis. Findings reveal a consonant priority placed on the role of UIC as an innovation driver in all three contexts. However, whereas China has exhibited a pronounced tendency to harness industry sector dynamics to reform pedagogical frameworks within its higher educational institutions and promote economic development, Japan’s approach to UIC is more motivated by the intention to maintain international competitiveness and address societal challenges peculiar to the nation. Meanwhile, Singapore places research collaboration and internationalization at the heart of its UIC agenda and highlights them as the key factors driving its leadership in global cutting-edge technology. Practical implications for governments include placing equal emphasis on both education-focused and research-oriented UIC, fostering stronger R&D collaboration frameworks between universities and industries, designing policies that promote cross-sectoral trust-building, and aligning long-term goals with the more immediate needs of the industry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产学合作(UIC)已成为当代全球高等教育领域的一个焦点。然而,尽管各国对产学研合作的集体利益已达成共识,但各国支持产学研合作的根本目的却往往各不相同。本研究试图并列三个经济蓬勃发展的亚洲国家围绕 UIC 的社会想象:中国、日本和新加坡。研究结果表明,在这三个国家中,UIC 作为创新驱动力的作用被放在了同等重要的位置。然而,中国明显倾向于利用产业部门的动力来改革高等教育机构的教学框架并促进经济发展,而日本对 UIC 的态度则更多是出于保持国际竞争力和应对本国特有的社会挑战的意图。与此同时,新加坡将研究合作和国际化作为其 UIC 议程的核心,并强调这是推动其在全球尖端技术领域取得领先地位的关键因素。这对各国政府的实际启示包括:同等重视以教育为重点的 UIC 和以研究为导向的 UIC;在大学和产业之间建立更强有力的研发合作框架;制定促进跨部门建立信任的政策;以及将长期目标与产业的近期需求结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Education Review
Asia Pacific Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Education Review (APER) aims to stimulate research, encourage academic exchange, and enhance the professional development of scholars and other researchers who are interested in educational and cultural issues in the Asia Pacific region. APER covers all areas of educational research, with a focus on cross-cultural, comparative and other studies with a broad Asia-Pacific context. APER is a peer reviewed journal produced by the Education Research Institute at Seoul National University. It was founded by the Institute of Asia Pacific Education Development, Seoul National University in 2000, which is owned and operated by Education Research Institute at Seoul National University since 2003. APER requires all submitted manuscripts to follow the seventh edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA; http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspx).
期刊最新文献
Editorial: What is the next step for APER to become an international journal? Modernizing higher education with industrial forces in Asia: a comparative study of discourse of university-industry collaboration in China, Japan and Singapore Self-directed computer-assisted professional development in Taiwanese bilingual schools: an exploratory study Educational materials in East Asian English-medium higher education settings A sequential engagement theory for Chinese rural students: analysis based on longitudinal data from an elite Chinese university
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1