Survival Benefits of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Ablation Therapy in Patients With Intermediate or Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Management and Research Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S511364
Jingyi Dai, Yadi Ding, Qiaomei Zheng, Guixin Zhao, Lingqing Zou, Jun Zhao, Yu Luo, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong
{"title":"Survival Benefits of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Ablation Therapy in Patients With Intermediate or Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study.","authors":"Jingyi Dai, Yadi Ding, Qiaomei Zheng, Guixin Zhao, Lingqing Zou, Jun Zhao, Yu Luo, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong","doi":"10.2147/CMAR.S511364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with intermediate to advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone were compared with those who underwent a combination of TACE and ablation therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study retrospectively evaluated 536 HCC patients in our hospital from July 2016 to November 2022. All patients underwent TACE, with a subset also receiving ablation therapy. To ensure comparability, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. We then compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between these two groups. Survival outcomes were analyzed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves and compared via the Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>200 among these 536 HCC patients received TACE combined with ablation whereas the remaining 336 received TACE alone. With PFS analysis, the numbers were reduced to 176 in combination therapy group and 250 in TACE alone group. With and without PSM, the OS and PFS were consistently and significantly better in the former than the latter group. In patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C, those who received combination therapy demonstrated significantly higher OS compared to those treated with TACE alone. For stage B patients, PFS was also significantly longer in the combination therapy group, before and after PSM [hazard ratio (HR), 0.563; 95% CI: 0.360-0.879; <i>P</i> = 0.012, HR, 0.613; 95% CI: 0.382-0.985; <i>P</i> = 0.043]. However, after PSM, no statistical difference in survival outcomes was observed between the two groups for stage C patients (HR, 0.673; 95% CI: 0.395-1.146; <i>P</i> = 0.145).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggested that for OS, the combination therapy has sustained benefits for both patients with stage B and C, But for PFS, the benefits of the combination therapy among the stage C patients, could not be persistently demonstrated by the current datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":9479,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Management and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"483-497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S511364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with intermediate to advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone were compared with those who underwent a combination of TACE and ablation therapy.

Patients and methods: This study retrospectively evaluated 536 HCC patients in our hospital from July 2016 to November 2022. All patients underwent TACE, with a subset also receiving ablation therapy. To ensure comparability, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. We then compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between these two groups. Survival outcomes were analyzed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves and compared via the Cox regression.

Results: 200 among these 536 HCC patients received TACE combined with ablation whereas the remaining 336 received TACE alone. With PFS analysis, the numbers were reduced to 176 in combination therapy group and 250 in TACE alone group. With and without PSM, the OS and PFS were consistently and significantly better in the former than the latter group. In patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C, those who received combination therapy demonstrated significantly higher OS compared to those treated with TACE alone. For stage B patients, PFS was also significantly longer in the combination therapy group, before and after PSM [hazard ratio (HR), 0.563; 95% CI: 0.360-0.879; P = 0.012, HR, 0.613; 95% CI: 0.382-0.985; P = 0.043]. However, after PSM, no statistical difference in survival outcomes was observed between the two groups for stage C patients (HR, 0.673; 95% CI: 0.395-1.146; P = 0.145).

Conclusion: Our data suggested that for OS, the combination therapy has sustained benefits for both patients with stage B and C, But for PFS, the benefits of the combination therapy among the stage C patients, could not be persistently demonstrated by the current datasets.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中晚期肝细胞癌患者经动脉化疗栓塞加消融治疗的生存益处:倾向评分匹配研究
目的:为了评估中晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的生存结果,将单独接受经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)的患者与接受TACE联合消融治疗的患者进行比较。患者和方法:本研究回顾性评估2016年7月至2022年11月我院536例HCC患者。所有患者均接受了TACE治疗,其中一部分患者还接受了消融治疗。为了确保可比性,进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM)。然后比较两组的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。生存结局采用Kaplan-Meier曲线进行分析,Cox回归进行比较。结果:536例HCC患者中有200例接受了TACE联合消融治疗,其余336例单独接受TACE治疗。经PFS分析,联合治疗组为176例,TACE单独治疗组为250例。不论有无PSM,前者的OS和PFS均明显优于后者。在巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC) B期或C期患者中,与单独接受TACE治疗的患者相比,接受联合治疗的患者表现出明显更高的OS。对于B期患者,联合治疗组PSM前后的PFS也明显更长[危险比(HR), 0.563;95% ci: 0.360-0.879;P = 0.012, hr, 0.613;95% ci: 0.382-0.985;P = 0.043]。但经PSM治疗后,两组C期患者的生存结局无统计学差异(HR, 0.673;95% ci: 0.395-1.146;P = 0.145)。结论:我们的数据表明,对于OS,联合治疗对B期和C期患者都有持续的益处,但对于PFS,联合治疗对C期患者的益处,目前的数据集无法持续证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Management and Research
Cancer Management and Research Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
448
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival, and quality of life for cancer patients. Specific topics covered in the journal include: ◦Epidemiology, detection and screening ◦Cellular research and biomarkers ◦Identification of biotargets and agents with novel mechanisms of action ◦Optimal clinical use of existing anticancer agents, including combination therapies ◦Radiation and surgery ◦Palliative care ◦Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical & epidemiological studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and case series that shed novel insights on a disease or disease subtype.
期刊最新文献
High Efficacy of Chemoimmunotherapy in Advanced ALK-Rearranged Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report. Treatment of Polidocanol Sclerotherapy in Persistent Lymphatic Drainage After Radical Surgery for Endometrial cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review. Impact of Surgical Wait Time on Survival After Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Factors Associated with Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Study. A Retrospective Study of a Postoperative Inflammation-Based Score for Predicting Disease-Free Survival in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1