Survival Benefits of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Ablation Therapy in Patients With Intermediate or Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Management and Research Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S511364
Jingyi Dai, Yadi Ding, Qiaomei Zheng, Guixin Zhao, Lingqing Zou, Jun Zhao, Yu Luo, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong
{"title":"Survival Benefits of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Ablation Therapy in Patients With Intermediate or Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study.","authors":"Jingyi Dai, Yadi Ding, Qiaomei Zheng, Guixin Zhao, Lingqing Zou, Jun Zhao, Yu Luo, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong","doi":"10.2147/CMAR.S511364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with intermediate to advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone were compared with those who underwent a combination of TACE and ablation therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study retrospectively evaluated 536 HCC patients in our hospital from July 2016 to November 2022. All patients underwent TACE, with a subset also receiving ablation therapy. To ensure comparability, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. We then compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between these two groups. Survival outcomes were analyzed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves and compared via the Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>200 among these 536 HCC patients received TACE combined with ablation whereas the remaining 336 received TACE alone. With PFS analysis, the numbers were reduced to 176 in combination therapy group and 250 in TACE alone group. With and without PSM, the OS and PFS were consistently and significantly better in the former than the latter group. In patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C, those who received combination therapy demonstrated significantly higher OS compared to those treated with TACE alone. For stage B patients, PFS was also significantly longer in the combination therapy group, before and after PSM [hazard ratio (HR), 0.563; 95% CI: 0.360-0.879; <i>P</i> = 0.012, HR, 0.613; 95% CI: 0.382-0.985; <i>P</i> = 0.043]. However, after PSM, no statistical difference in survival outcomes was observed between the two groups for stage C patients (HR, 0.673; 95% CI: 0.395-1.146; <i>P</i> = 0.145).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggested that for OS, the combination therapy has sustained benefits for both patients with stage B and C, But for PFS, the benefits of the combination therapy among the stage C patients, could not be persistently demonstrated by the current datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":9479,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Management and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"483-497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S511364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with intermediate to advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone were compared with those who underwent a combination of TACE and ablation therapy.

Patients and methods: This study retrospectively evaluated 536 HCC patients in our hospital from July 2016 to November 2022. All patients underwent TACE, with a subset also receiving ablation therapy. To ensure comparability, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. We then compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between these two groups. Survival outcomes were analyzed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves and compared via the Cox regression.

Results: 200 among these 536 HCC patients received TACE combined with ablation whereas the remaining 336 received TACE alone. With PFS analysis, the numbers were reduced to 176 in combination therapy group and 250 in TACE alone group. With and without PSM, the OS and PFS were consistently and significantly better in the former than the latter group. In patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C, those who received combination therapy demonstrated significantly higher OS compared to those treated with TACE alone. For stage B patients, PFS was also significantly longer in the combination therapy group, before and after PSM [hazard ratio (HR), 0.563; 95% CI: 0.360-0.879; P = 0.012, HR, 0.613; 95% CI: 0.382-0.985; P = 0.043]. However, after PSM, no statistical difference in survival outcomes was observed between the two groups for stage C patients (HR, 0.673; 95% CI: 0.395-1.146; P = 0.145).

Conclusion: Our data suggested that for OS, the combination therapy has sustained benefits for both patients with stage B and C, But for PFS, the benefits of the combination therapy among the stage C patients, could not be persistently demonstrated by the current datasets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Management and Research
Cancer Management and Research Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
448
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival, and quality of life for cancer patients. Specific topics covered in the journal include: ◦Epidemiology, detection and screening ◦Cellular research and biomarkers ◦Identification of biotargets and agents with novel mechanisms of action ◦Optimal clinical use of existing anticancer agents, including combination therapies ◦Radiation and surgery ◦Palliative care ◦Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical & epidemiological studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and case series that shed novel insights on a disease or disease subtype.
期刊最新文献
Examining the Outcomes of Palliative Oophorectomy of Ovarian Metastases in de-Novo Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Its Association with RAS Mutation Status: Insights from a Single-Institution Perspective. A Retrospective Real-World Study of Pyrotinib in HER-2 Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. Survival Benefits of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Ablation Therapy in Patients With Intermediate or Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study. Multimodal Framework in Lung Cancer Management: Integrating Liquid Biopsy with Traditional Diagnostic Techniques. Drug Repurposing in Pancreatic Cancer: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective to Improve Treatment Options for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1