Evaluating the prognostic role of computed tomography Hounsfield units in anticipating spinal outcomes post-instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
{"title":"Evaluating the prognostic role of computed tomography Hounsfield units in anticipating spinal outcomes post-instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chinedu Egu, Elie Najjar, Spyridon Komaitis, Edidiong Essiet, Samuel Akintunde, Vusumuzi Sibanda, Khalid Salem, Opinder Sahota, Nasir Quraishi","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08737-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements derived from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans has emerged as a promising surrogate for assessing bone mineral density (BMD). This systematic review aims to elucidate the role of HU in predicting spinal outcomes in patients undergoing spinal instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive systematic review of the English-language literature was performed across multiple databases, focusing specifically on adult patients who underwent spinal instrumentation. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, studies published between 2017 and 2024 that investigated the correlation between HU measurements and spinal outcomes were included. Data extraction and subsequent meta-analysis were conducted utilizing a random effects model. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and statistical analyses were executed with R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of thirty-five retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a cohort of 3,927 patients. The reported rates of complications included cage subsidence at 35.5%, pedicle screw loosening at 27.9%, proximal junctional failure at 28.6%, and pseudoarthrosis at 66.7%. Notably, lower HU values were significantly associated with an increased incidence of complications across all studies. The delineated HU cutoff thresholds for predicting specific complications were as follows: 198 HU for lumbar interbody fusion cage subsidence; 116 HU and 126 HU for pedicle screw loosening in lumbar and thoracic spine fusions, respectively; 151 HU for proximal junctional failure in thoracolumbar spinal fusion; and 240-260 HU for pseudoarthrosis following anterior odontoid screw fixation. HU measurements were typically calculated as the mean HU of the vertebrae in the operational segments: cervical (C2-C7), thoracic (T1-T12), lumbar (L1-L4), or sacral (S1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis substantiates a significant correlation between reduced HU values and spinal complications following instrumentation. Specifically, thresholds of below 130 HU for thoracic and lumbar pedicle screw loosening, below 200 HU for lumbar cage subsidence, approximately 150 HU for proximal junctional failure in the thoracolumbar region, and below 260 HU for pseudoarthrosis subsequent to anterior odontoid screw fixation were identified. The mean vertebral HU of the surgical segments serves as a reliable metric for this assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08737-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The use of Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements derived from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans has emerged as a promising surrogate for assessing bone mineral density (BMD). This systematic review aims to elucidate the role of HU in predicting spinal outcomes in patients undergoing spinal instrumentation.
Methods: A comprehensive systematic review of the English-language literature was performed across multiple databases, focusing specifically on adult patients who underwent spinal instrumentation. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, studies published between 2017 and 2024 that investigated the correlation between HU measurements and spinal outcomes were included. Data extraction and subsequent meta-analysis were conducted utilizing a random effects model. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and statistical analyses were executed with R software.
Results: A total of thirty-five retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a cohort of 3,927 patients. The reported rates of complications included cage subsidence at 35.5%, pedicle screw loosening at 27.9%, proximal junctional failure at 28.6%, and pseudoarthrosis at 66.7%. Notably, lower HU values were significantly associated with an increased incidence of complications across all studies. The delineated HU cutoff thresholds for predicting specific complications were as follows: 198 HU for lumbar interbody fusion cage subsidence; 116 HU and 126 HU for pedicle screw loosening in lumbar and thoracic spine fusions, respectively; 151 HU for proximal junctional failure in thoracolumbar spinal fusion; and 240-260 HU for pseudoarthrosis following anterior odontoid screw fixation. HU measurements were typically calculated as the mean HU of the vertebrae in the operational segments: cervical (C2-C7), thoracic (T1-T12), lumbar (L1-L4), or sacral (S1).
Conclusion: This meta-analysis substantiates a significant correlation between reduced HU values and spinal complications following instrumentation. Specifically, thresholds of below 130 HU for thoracic and lumbar pedicle screw loosening, below 200 HU for lumbar cage subsidence, approximately 150 HU for proximal junctional failure in the thoracolumbar region, and below 260 HU for pseudoarthrosis subsequent to anterior odontoid screw fixation were identified. The mean vertebral HU of the surgical segments serves as a reliable metric for this assessment.
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe