Xinyi Guo, Nana Cao, Xin Deng, Nan Wang, Rui Li, Song Ren, Fei Fu, Liqing Kang, Zhen He
{"title":"Intermuscular adipose tissue affected muscle density more than intramuscular adipose tissue content with opportunistic screening at abdominal CT.","authors":"Xinyi Guo, Nana Cao, Xin Deng, Nan Wang, Rui Li, Song Ren, Fei Fu, Liqing Kang, Zhen He","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-85946-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine whether intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) or intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) has a greater effect on skeletal muscle density (SMD) and to explore the underlying mechanisms. We recruited 292 inpatients without musculoskeletal system disease, all of whom underwent abdominal CT. Muscle parameters, including skeletal muscle area (SMA), skeletal muscle index (SMI), SMD, IMAC, and IMAT, as well as fat parameters-subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and subcutaneous fat density (SFD) in the abdominal wall-were measured by two musculoskeletal radiologists using ImageJ software at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level. One-way ANOVA with LSD (chi-square test for group comparisons where p > 0.05) or Dunnett's T3 test (p < 0.05) was employed to compare muscle parameters between genders and across age groups. The relationship between SMD and muscle measurements was analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Multiple regression analysis identified and compared factors influencing SMD. SMD was highly correlated with IMAT and IMAC (p < 0.05), moderately correlated with gender, age, and SFA (p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that IMAC, IMAT, and age significantly affected SMD (p < 0.05), with the order of influence being IMAT (β = -0.616), IMAC (β = -0.429), and age (β = -0.098). SFA and gender did not significantly affect SMD (p > 0.05). The findings revealed that age, IMAT, and IMAC influence SMD, with IMAT exerting the most significant impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"8172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85946-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) or intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) has a greater effect on skeletal muscle density (SMD) and to explore the underlying mechanisms. We recruited 292 inpatients without musculoskeletal system disease, all of whom underwent abdominal CT. Muscle parameters, including skeletal muscle area (SMA), skeletal muscle index (SMI), SMD, IMAC, and IMAT, as well as fat parameters-subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and subcutaneous fat density (SFD) in the abdominal wall-were measured by two musculoskeletal radiologists using ImageJ software at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level. One-way ANOVA with LSD (chi-square test for group comparisons where p > 0.05) or Dunnett's T3 test (p < 0.05) was employed to compare muscle parameters between genders and across age groups. The relationship between SMD and muscle measurements was analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Multiple regression analysis identified and compared factors influencing SMD. SMD was highly correlated with IMAT and IMAC (p < 0.05), moderately correlated with gender, age, and SFA (p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that IMAC, IMAT, and age significantly affected SMD (p < 0.05), with the order of influence being IMAT (β = -0.616), IMAC (β = -0.429), and age (β = -0.098). SFA and gender did not significantly affect SMD (p > 0.05). The findings revealed that age, IMAT, and IMAC influence SMD, with IMAT exerting the most significant impact.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.