Fully percutaneous posterior transarticular C1-C2 stand-alone screw instrumentation: A case series and technical note.

Ivan Lvov, Andrey Grin, Anton Kordonskiy, Zaali Barbakadze, Aleksandr Talypov, Aleksandr Tupikin
{"title":"Fully percutaneous posterior transarticular C1-C2 stand-alone screw instrumentation: A case series and technical note.","authors":"Ivan Lvov, Andrey Grin, Anton Kordonskiy, Zaali Barbakadze, Aleksandr Talypov, Aleksandr Tupikin","doi":"10.1016/j.neucie.2025.500665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magerl's technique remains a widely accepted method for achieving C1-C2 fusion. Although two approaches using intermuscular corridors and biplanar X-ray guidance have been reported, there are no published studies dedicated to fully percutaneous techniques employing cannulated screws.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate the feasibility of a fully percutaneous C1-C2 fixation technique using cannulated screws and to analyze the short- and long-term outcomes of the initial case series.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This case series included patients over 15 years of age who were presented with acute or subacute atlantoaxial instability at C1-C2 due to fractures of the odontoid process, C1 vertebra, or C2 vertebral body. Surgical details and fusion criteria were described. Due to the absence of comparison groups, only descriptive statistical methods were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 patients (8 men, 3 women; mean age 41.5 ± 18.2 years) underwent fully percutaneous transarticular C1-C2 fixation. The mean operative time was 115.0 ± 30.8 min for patients stabilized using a Halo device and 80.6 ± 33.2 min for those immobilized with a Mayfield clamp. The mean blood loss across all cases was 38.8 ± 8.7 mL. One patient died from concurrent cardiac pathology. Two patients were lost to follow-up due to relocation, leaving 8 patients for final assessment. At final follow-up, the mean VAS score was 2 ± 1.5 and the mean NDI score was 5.3 ± 5.2. All patients with preoperative neurological deficits improved by one level on the ASIA scale. Fusion was achieved in 7 of 8 cases (87.5%), and 1 patient (12.5%) developed a stable C1-C2 pseudoarthrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our initial clinical experience demonstrated that fully percutaneous posterior transarticular C1-C2 stand-alone screw fixation using cannulated instruments could be a feasible and safe procedure. Critical requirements for this technique include complete reduction of atlantoaxial dislocation, compression in the lateral joint region, adequate intraoperative visualization, and strict adherence to specific screw trajectories.</p>","PeriodicalId":74273,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","volume":" ","pages":"500665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucie.2025.500665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magerl's technique remains a widely accepted method for achieving C1-C2 fusion. Although two approaches using intermuscular corridors and biplanar X-ray guidance have been reported, there are no published studies dedicated to fully percutaneous techniques employing cannulated screws.

Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of a fully percutaneous C1-C2 fixation technique using cannulated screws and to analyze the short- and long-term outcomes of the initial case series.

Material and methods: This case series included patients over 15 years of age who were presented with acute or subacute atlantoaxial instability at C1-C2 due to fractures of the odontoid process, C1 vertebra, or C2 vertebral body. Surgical details and fusion criteria were described. Due to the absence of comparison groups, only descriptive statistical methods were employed.

Results: A total of 11 patients (8 men, 3 women; mean age 41.5 ± 18.2 years) underwent fully percutaneous transarticular C1-C2 fixation. The mean operative time was 115.0 ± 30.8 min for patients stabilized using a Halo device and 80.6 ± 33.2 min for those immobilized with a Mayfield clamp. The mean blood loss across all cases was 38.8 ± 8.7 mL. One patient died from concurrent cardiac pathology. Two patients were lost to follow-up due to relocation, leaving 8 patients for final assessment. At final follow-up, the mean VAS score was 2 ± 1.5 and the mean NDI score was 5.3 ± 5.2. All patients with preoperative neurological deficits improved by one level on the ASIA scale. Fusion was achieved in 7 of 8 cases (87.5%), and 1 patient (12.5%) developed a stable C1-C2 pseudoarthrosis.

Conclusion: Our initial clinical experience demonstrated that fully percutaneous posterior transarticular C1-C2 stand-alone screw fixation using cannulated instruments could be a feasible and safe procedure. Critical requirements for this technique include complete reduction of atlantoaxial dislocation, compression in the lateral joint region, adequate intraoperative visualization, and strict adherence to specific screw trajectories.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contralateral subdural effusion following decompressive hinged craniotomy: A case report and narrative review. Dr Máximo Poza y Poza. Craniopharyngioma and abscess: When tumor and infection co-exist. ALIF in a Spanish female cohort: No urinary and sexual complications or a gender bias? Fully percutaneous posterior transarticular C1-C2 stand-alone screw instrumentation: A case series and technical note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1