Jinzhao Liu , Daniele Penna , Xiong Xiao , Li Guo , Guo Chen , Chong Jiang , Huawu Wu , Shengjie Wang , Zhiyun Jiang , Zhao Jin , Zhisheng An
{"title":"Towards an isotope-based conceptual catchment model of the ecohydrological cycle in the Critical Zone on the Loess Plateau of China","authors":"Jinzhao Liu , Daniele Penna , Xiong Xiao , Li Guo , Guo Chen , Chong Jiang , Huawu Wu , Shengjie Wang , Zhiyun Jiang , Zhao Jin , Zhisheng An","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A mechanistic understanding of the interacting processes governing the ecohydrological cycle is of paramount importance for comprehending the soil–plant-atmosphere continuum (SPAC) in the Critical Zone. The analysis of these processes may necessarily consider the different water types that characterize ecohydrological flux exchanges at the catchment scale but, so far, few studies have disentangled functional interactions among various water types within the Critical Zone. This study leveraged three years of isotope data (δ<sup>18</sup>O and δ<sup>2</sup>H) collected from twelve water sources, including precipitation, throughfall, snow, stream water, groundwater, dew water, frost water, mobile and less-mobile soil water, root water, stem water, and leaf water in two catchments with distinct land cover (forestland versus grassland) on the Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP). We infer the main ecohydrological processes controlling water exchange in the Critical Zone under the contrasting vegetation covers. Our results showed new interactions among the several investigated water types, and in particular highlighted that: i) The seasonal isotopic variation in precipitation played a critical role in the seasonal isotopic patterns observed in other water types; ii) Dew water significantly contributed to leaf water uptake, more in forestland (26 ± 6 %) than in grassland (16 ± 11 %). Snow and groundwater were more influential for root water of shrubs and grasses in forestland (59 ± 34 % and 16 ± 8 % for snow and groundwater, respectively) than in grassland (36 ± 26 % and 6 ± 6 %) and they were very important for stem water of trees in forestland (84 ± 14 % and 45 ± 22 % for snow and groundwater, respectively); iii) Isotopic values in mobile and less-mobile soil water differed significantly between forestland and grassland (<em>p</em> < 0.05), but those in plant water (root, stem, and leaf water) did not differ significantly (<em>p</em> > 0.05); and iv) There were dynamic exchanges between mobile and less-mobile soil water, and between groundwater and soil water on the CLP. All these observations allowed us to establish a new isotope-based conceptual model of the ecohydrological cycle in the Critical Zone of the CLP that provides the foundation for future research and sustainable water resource management in this region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"656 ","pages":"Article 133042"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003804","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A mechanistic understanding of the interacting processes governing the ecohydrological cycle is of paramount importance for comprehending the soil–plant-atmosphere continuum (SPAC) in the Critical Zone. The analysis of these processes may necessarily consider the different water types that characterize ecohydrological flux exchanges at the catchment scale but, so far, few studies have disentangled functional interactions among various water types within the Critical Zone. This study leveraged three years of isotope data (δ18O and δ2H) collected from twelve water sources, including precipitation, throughfall, snow, stream water, groundwater, dew water, frost water, mobile and less-mobile soil water, root water, stem water, and leaf water in two catchments with distinct land cover (forestland versus grassland) on the Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP). We infer the main ecohydrological processes controlling water exchange in the Critical Zone under the contrasting vegetation covers. Our results showed new interactions among the several investigated water types, and in particular highlighted that: i) The seasonal isotopic variation in precipitation played a critical role in the seasonal isotopic patterns observed in other water types; ii) Dew water significantly contributed to leaf water uptake, more in forestland (26 ± 6 %) than in grassland (16 ± 11 %). Snow and groundwater were more influential for root water of shrubs and grasses in forestland (59 ± 34 % and 16 ± 8 % for snow and groundwater, respectively) than in grassland (36 ± 26 % and 6 ± 6 %) and they were very important for stem water of trees in forestland (84 ± 14 % and 45 ± 22 % for snow and groundwater, respectively); iii) Isotopic values in mobile and less-mobile soil water differed significantly between forestland and grassland (p < 0.05), but those in plant water (root, stem, and leaf water) did not differ significantly (p > 0.05); and iv) There were dynamic exchanges between mobile and less-mobile soil water, and between groundwater and soil water on the CLP. All these observations allowed us to establish a new isotope-based conceptual model of the ecohydrological cycle in the Critical Zone of the CLP that provides the foundation for future research and sustainable water resource management in this region.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.