Rope effect in mechanical panel-timber connections: A comparison between screws and dowels

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120036
Mattia Debertolis , Yue Wang , Tianxiang Wang , Roberto Crocetti , Magnus Wålinder
{"title":"Rope effect in mechanical panel-timber connections: A comparison between screws and dowels","authors":"Mattia Debertolis ,&nbsp;Yue Wang ,&nbsp;Tianxiang Wang ,&nbsp;Roberto Crocetti ,&nbsp;Magnus Wålinder","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of birch plywood as a substitute for steel plates in multi-plane shear connections of timber structures due to, among other things, its low environmental impact, better workability, and relatively low cost. However, models in modern building codes, such as Eurocode EN1995–1 (EC5), can be used to determine the load-carrying capacity of timber connections with up to two shear planes. Furthermore, some studies have shown that EC5 design model tend to underestimate the actual load-carrying capacity of timber connections. Therefore, there are some uncertainties concerning suitable design models to assess the load-carrying capacity of such connections. This study was preliminary conducted to shed light on the reasons for such discrepancies, conducting several experiments on both doweled and screwed birch plywood-to-timber connections, with either two or four shear planes. The analytical load-carrying capacities estimated by EC5 showed underestimation of the experimental results, with greater underestimation when fully threaded screws are adopted as fasteners, rather than smooth dowels. Furthermore, regardless of the type of fastener, a substantial discrepancy between EC5’s prediction and experimental results was observed when the number of shear planes was increased from two to four. The results of the investigations indicate that the main cause of the discrepancies might be associated with the so-called “rope effect” which is taken into account by EC5’s design approach in an over-conservative manner.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 120036"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625004274","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of birch plywood as a substitute for steel plates in multi-plane shear connections of timber structures due to, among other things, its low environmental impact, better workability, and relatively low cost. However, models in modern building codes, such as Eurocode EN1995–1 (EC5), can be used to determine the load-carrying capacity of timber connections with up to two shear planes. Furthermore, some studies have shown that EC5 design model tend to underestimate the actual load-carrying capacity of timber connections. Therefore, there are some uncertainties concerning suitable design models to assess the load-carrying capacity of such connections. This study was preliminary conducted to shed light on the reasons for such discrepancies, conducting several experiments on both doweled and screwed birch plywood-to-timber connections, with either two or four shear planes. The analytical load-carrying capacities estimated by EC5 showed underestimation of the experimental results, with greater underestimation when fully threaded screws are adopted as fasteners, rather than smooth dowels. Furthermore, regardless of the type of fastener, a substantial discrepancy between EC5’s prediction and experimental results was observed when the number of shear planes was increased from two to four. The results of the investigations indicate that the main cause of the discrepancies might be associated with the so-called “rope effect” which is taken into account by EC5’s design approach in an over-conservative manner.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械面板与木材连接中的绳索效应:螺钉与销钉的比较
先前的研究已经证明了桦木胶合板在木结构的多平面剪切连接中作为钢板替代品的潜力,因为它对环境的影响小,可加工性好,成本相对较低。然而,现代建筑规范中的模型,如欧洲规范EN1995-1 (EC5),可用于确定最多有两个剪切面的木材连接的承载能力。此外,一些研究表明,EC5设计模型往往低估了木材连接的实际承载能力。因此,采用合适的设计模型来评估这种连接的承载能力存在一定的不确定性。这项研究是为了阐明这种差异的原因而进行的初步研究,在两个或四个剪切平面上对桦木胶合板与木材的连接进行了几次试验。EC5估算的分析承载能力低估了实验结果,当采用全螺纹螺钉而不是光滑销钉作为紧固件时,低估的程度更大。此外,无论紧固件类型如何,当剪切面数量从2个增加到4个时,观察到EC5的预测结果与实验结果之间存在显着差异。调查结果表明,差异的主要原因可能与所谓的“绳索效应”有关,EC5的设计方法以过度保守的方式考虑了这一效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Simplified method for verifying ultimate limit state conditions of resistance for masonry shear walls Experimental and numerical investigation of flow-induced vibration in CMC turbine blades using fluid-structure interaction Experimental assessment of micropile flexural capacity at threaded joints subjected to combined axial compression and bending A simple and efficient iterative translation approximation method for simulating stationary non-Gaussian stochastic vector processes An efficient strong seismic analysis model for running safety thresholds of train-track-high pier bridge dynamic system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1