Mattia Debertolis , Yue Wang , Tianxiang Wang , Roberto Crocetti , Magnus Wålinder
{"title":"Rope effect in mechanical panel-timber connections: A comparison between screws and dowels","authors":"Mattia Debertolis , Yue Wang , Tianxiang Wang , Roberto Crocetti , Magnus Wålinder","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of birch plywood as a substitute for steel plates in multi-plane shear connections of timber structures due to, among other things, its low environmental impact, better workability, and relatively low cost. However, models in modern building codes, such as Eurocode EN1995–1 (EC5), can be used to determine the load-carrying capacity of timber connections with up to two shear planes. Furthermore, some studies have shown that EC5 design model tend to underestimate the actual load-carrying capacity of timber connections. Therefore, there are some uncertainties concerning suitable design models to assess the load-carrying capacity of such connections. This study was preliminary conducted to shed light on the reasons for such discrepancies, conducting several experiments on both doweled and screwed birch plywood-to-timber connections, with either two or four shear planes. The analytical load-carrying capacities estimated by EC5 showed underestimation of the experimental results, with greater underestimation when fully threaded screws are adopted as fasteners, rather than smooth dowels. Furthermore, regardless of the type of fastener, a substantial discrepancy between EC5’s prediction and experimental results was observed when the number of shear planes was increased from two to four. The results of the investigations indicate that the main cause of the discrepancies might be associated with the so-called “rope effect” which is taken into account by EC5’s design approach in an over-conservative manner.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 120036"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625004274","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of birch plywood as a substitute for steel plates in multi-plane shear connections of timber structures due to, among other things, its low environmental impact, better workability, and relatively low cost. However, models in modern building codes, such as Eurocode EN1995–1 (EC5), can be used to determine the load-carrying capacity of timber connections with up to two shear planes. Furthermore, some studies have shown that EC5 design model tend to underestimate the actual load-carrying capacity of timber connections. Therefore, there are some uncertainties concerning suitable design models to assess the load-carrying capacity of such connections. This study was preliminary conducted to shed light on the reasons for such discrepancies, conducting several experiments on both doweled and screwed birch plywood-to-timber connections, with either two or four shear planes. The analytical load-carrying capacities estimated by EC5 showed underestimation of the experimental results, with greater underestimation when fully threaded screws are adopted as fasteners, rather than smooth dowels. Furthermore, regardless of the type of fastener, a substantial discrepancy between EC5’s prediction and experimental results was observed when the number of shear planes was increased from two to four. The results of the investigations indicate that the main cause of the discrepancies might be associated with the so-called “rope effect” which is taken into account by EC5’s design approach in an over-conservative manner.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.