“We have a lot to say about loadshedding”: Exploring citizen engagements and perceptions on power cuts in South Africa

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104019
Leon Tinashe Gwaka
{"title":"“We have a lot to say about loadshedding”: Exploring citizen engagements and perceptions on power cuts in South Africa","authors":"Leon Tinashe Gwaka","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The persistent energy crisis in South Africa, characterized by widespread loadshedding, emerged as a critical point of social and political discourse, particularly in the lead up to the 2024 general elections. Within this context, digital democracy played a pivotal role, as citizens leveraged social media platforms to voice their frustrations, demand accountability, and engage in political debates, shaping public sentiment and influencing the political landscape. This study investigates how South African citizens engaged with the loadshedding crisis on the X platform (formerly Twitter), and how these engagements reflect broader societal dynamics, including political sentiments and socioeconomic inequalities. This study applies topic modeling and narrative analysis to 4392 tweets from January 2023 to explore themes and narratives that emerged from online discussions about loadshedding. The findings reveal that citizens not only expressed frustration and blamed the ANC led government but also discussed the inequities in loadshedding schedules and shared strategies for coping with the crisis. Additionally, the study provides insight into the evolution of digital politics in South Africa, particularly how online discourse might influence political outcomes. By analyzing social media content, this research offers a deeper understanding of how crises like loadshedding serve as catalysts for public engagement and reflection on underlying social and political tensions in South Africa. The study contributes to the growing body of literature on digital democracy and crisis communication, offering a nuanced view of how citizens navigate and make sense of systemic failures in a complex and divided society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 104019"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The persistent energy crisis in South Africa, characterized by widespread loadshedding, emerged as a critical point of social and political discourse, particularly in the lead up to the 2024 general elections. Within this context, digital democracy played a pivotal role, as citizens leveraged social media platforms to voice their frustrations, demand accountability, and engage in political debates, shaping public sentiment and influencing the political landscape. This study investigates how South African citizens engaged with the loadshedding crisis on the X platform (formerly Twitter), and how these engagements reflect broader societal dynamics, including political sentiments and socioeconomic inequalities. This study applies topic modeling and narrative analysis to 4392 tweets from January 2023 to explore themes and narratives that emerged from online discussions about loadshedding. The findings reveal that citizens not only expressed frustration and blamed the ANC led government but also discussed the inequities in loadshedding schedules and shared strategies for coping with the crisis. Additionally, the study provides insight into the evolution of digital politics in South Africa, particularly how online discourse might influence political outcomes. By analyzing social media content, this research offers a deeper understanding of how crises like loadshedding serve as catalysts for public engagement and reflection on underlying social and political tensions in South Africa. The study contributes to the growing body of literature on digital democracy and crisis communication, offering a nuanced view of how citizens navigate and make sense of systemic failures in a complex and divided society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们对减负荷有很多话要说”:探索南非民众对停电的参与和看法
南非持续的能源危机,其特点是广泛的负荷减少,成为社会和政治话语的关键点,特别是在2024年大选之前。在这种背景下,数字民主发挥了关键作用,公民利用社交媒体平台表达自己的不满,要求问责,参与政治辩论,塑造公众情绪,影响政治格局。这项研究调查了南非公民如何在X平台(以前的Twitter)上参与减负荷危机,以及这些参与如何反映更广泛的社会动态,包括政治情绪和社会经济不平等。本研究对2023年1月以来的4392条推文进行了主题建模和叙事分析,以探索有关减负荷的在线讨论中出现的主题和叙事。调查结果显示,市民们不仅对非国大领导的政府表示不满和指责,而且还讨论了停电时间表的不公平,并分享了应对危机的战略。此外,该研究还深入了解了南非数字政治的演变,特别是在线话语如何影响政治结果。通过分析社交媒体内容,本研究更深入地了解了像减负荷这样的危机如何成为公众参与和反思南非潜在社会和政治紧张局势的催化剂。这项研究为越来越多关于数字民主和危机沟通的文献做出了贡献,为公民如何在一个复杂而分裂的社会中应对和理解系统性失败提供了细致入微的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Addressing “the ones behind”: Public responses to technologies and the role of responsibility Private sector agency in low-carbon transitions: Rethinking energy security through hybrid governance in the Global South Infrastructure failures and aging populations: Quantifying the spatial overlap of power outages and older adult vulnerability The efficiency divide: Housing constraints on energy-saving practices in Darwin, Australia From anti-reflexive politicization to anti-reflexive policies: The emergence of renewable exclusion zones in United States environmental policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1