Comparison of clinical effects between sacrospinous ligament fixation and extraperitoneal high uterosacral ligament suspension for patients: A retrospective cohort clinical trials

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1111/jog.16264
Jiaoyang Song, Xiaohui Sun, Bing Xie, Shiyan Wang, Lei Gao, Xiuli Sun
{"title":"Comparison of clinical effects between sacrospinous ligament fixation and extraperitoneal high uterosacral ligament suspension for patients: A retrospective cohort clinical trials","authors":"Jiaoyang Song,&nbsp;Xiaohui Sun,&nbsp;Bing Xie,&nbsp;Shiyan Wang,&nbsp;Lei Gao,&nbsp;Xiuli Sun","doi":"10.1111/jog.16264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of the study is to compare the effect of extraperitoneal high uterosacral ligament suspension (EHUS) and sacrospinous ligament fixation on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and anatomical reduction in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study concluded 91 patients with POP who underwent EHUS or sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) for apical repair. The primary outcome was the effect of the two operations on anatomical reduction. The main secondary outcomes included improvement of questionnaire scores, satisfaction, and subjective prolapse rate. Categorical variables, Student's <i>t</i> test, and the Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test were used for analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All patients' scores of POP-Q were significantly improved after surgery. The scores of urinary frequency and urgency in the SSLF group improved significantly from 6 months after surgery, with statistical significance (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), while the scores of nocturia and urgency in the EHUS group improved from 1 month after surgery (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The scores of questionnaires in both groups were significantly lower than those before surgery, while the EHUS group showed more significant improvement (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>EHUS is easy to operate, has a short operative time, fewer perioperative and postoperative complications, and the apical can be suspended well if the prolapse is not severe. It also has a certain degree of relief for LUTS, which is a new type of operation that is worthy of clinical promotion.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16264","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The aim of the study is to compare the effect of extraperitoneal high uterosacral ligament suspension (EHUS) and sacrospinous ligament fixation on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and anatomical reduction in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study concluded 91 patients with POP who underwent EHUS or sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) for apical repair. The primary outcome was the effect of the two operations on anatomical reduction. The main secondary outcomes included improvement of questionnaire scores, satisfaction, and subjective prolapse rate. Categorical variables, Student's t test, and the Mann–Whitney U test were used for analysis.

Results

All patients' scores of POP-Q were significantly improved after surgery. The scores of urinary frequency and urgency in the SSLF group improved significantly from 6 months after surgery, with statistical significance (p < 0.05), while the scores of nocturia and urgency in the EHUS group improved from 1 month after surgery (p < 0.05). The scores of questionnaires in both groups were significantly lower than those before surgery, while the EHUS group showed more significant improvement (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

EHUS is easy to operate, has a short operative time, fewer perioperative and postoperative complications, and the apical can be suspended well if the prolapse is not severe. It also has a certain degree of relief for LUTS, which is a new type of operation that is worthy of clinical promotion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and vaginal noise: A cross-sectional study Letter to “Will the day come when opinion and letter pieces disappear from the medical journals?” Comparison of clinical effects between sacrospinous ligament fixation and extraperitoneal high uterosacral ligament suspension for patients: A retrospective cohort clinical trials Exosomal-complement system activation in preeclampsia Proposals for improving maternal safety (2023 edition): Insights from the analysis of maternal deaths in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1