Superior Benefits of Combining Mepolizumab With Sinus Surgery Compared to Mepolizumab Alone: Results From a Randomised 6-Month Trial

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1002/alr.23562
Anne-Sophie Homøe, Kasper Aanæs, Jens Even Tidemandsen, Haase Christiane Holbaek, Rubek Niclas, Samuelsen Grethe Badsberg, Larsen Bent Ivan Holmegaard, Vibeke Backer
{"title":"Superior Benefits of Combining Mepolizumab With Sinus Surgery Compared to Mepolizumab Alone: Results From a Randomised 6-Month Trial","authors":"Anne-Sophie Homøe,&nbsp;Kasper Aanæs,&nbsp;Jens Even Tidemandsen,&nbsp;Haase Christiane Holbaek,&nbsp;Rubek Niclas,&nbsp;Samuelsen Grethe Badsberg,&nbsp;Larsen Bent Ivan Holmegaard,&nbsp;Vibeke Backer","doi":"10.1002/alr.23562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) significantly impacts patients’ quality of life (QoL). Standard treatments include nasal irrigations, nasal steroids, systemic corticosteroids, and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Uncontrolled severe CRSwNP treated with monoclonal antibodies (biologic drugs) gain better disease control, although some residual symptoms may persist. Combining biologic therapy with FESS could potentially reduce residual symptoms faster and for a longer period. Therefore, we aim to compare the effectiveness of combined FESS and biologic therapy against biologics alone in patients with severe CRSwNP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This randomised controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 58 patients with CRSwNP and type 2 inflammation who were randomly assigned to FESS or non-FESS groups. All patients were treated with 100 mg of s.c. mepolizumab every 4 weeks for 6 months. Those in the FESS group underwent surgery 2 weeks after the first injection. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 6 months using the sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22), visual analog scale (VAS), nasal congestion score (NCS), and the smell identification test (16 sticks). Clinical evaluations were performed using rhinoscopy to identify nasal polyp scores (NPS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both treatment groups significantly improved in terms of their SNOT-22 scores after 6 months of treatment (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were not significant differences between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.055). Patients with large NPS (6–8) improved significantly in terms of their SNOT-22 scores when they underwent combined treatment (FESS and mepolizumab) compared with s.c. mepolizumab alone (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). They also exhibited improvements in ΔNPS (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), VAS CRS (<i>p</i> = 0.074), and NCS reduction (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) after undergoing combined treatment compared with those who had mepolizumab alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with large polyp scores experienced significant improvements in their QoL (SNOT-22) and reduced NPS, NCS, and VAS CRS more when polyp burden was reduced with FESS in association with mepolizumab treatment compared to those treated with mepolizumab alone.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":"15 7","pages":"724-733"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alr.23562","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.23562","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) significantly impacts patients’ quality of life (QoL). Standard treatments include nasal irrigations, nasal steroids, systemic corticosteroids, and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Uncontrolled severe CRSwNP treated with monoclonal antibodies (biologic drugs) gain better disease control, although some residual symptoms may persist. Combining biologic therapy with FESS could potentially reduce residual symptoms faster and for a longer period. Therefore, we aim to compare the effectiveness of combined FESS and biologic therapy against biologics alone in patients with severe CRSwNP.

Materials and Methods

This randomised controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 58 patients with CRSwNP and type 2 inflammation who were randomly assigned to FESS or non-FESS groups. All patients were treated with 100 mg of s.c. mepolizumab every 4 weeks for 6 months. Those in the FESS group underwent surgery 2 weeks after the first injection. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 6 months using the sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22), visual analog scale (VAS), nasal congestion score (NCS), and the smell identification test (16 sticks). Clinical evaluations were performed using rhinoscopy to identify nasal polyp scores (NPS).

Results

Both treatment groups significantly improved in terms of their SNOT-22 scores after 6 months of treatment (p < 0.001). There were not significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.055). Patients with large NPS (6–8) improved significantly in terms of their SNOT-22 scores when they underwent combined treatment (FESS and mepolizumab) compared with s.c. mepolizumab alone (p < 0.05). They also exhibited improvements in ΔNPS (p < 0.001), VAS CRS (p = 0.074), and NCS reduction (p < 0.001) after undergoing combined treatment compared with those who had mepolizumab alone.

Conclusion

Patients with large polyp scores experienced significant improvements in their QoL (SNOT-22) and reduced NPS, NCS, and VAS CRS more when polyp burden was reduced with FESS in association with mepolizumab treatment compared to those treated with mepolizumab alone.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mepolizumab联合鼻窦手术优于单独Mepolizumab:来自6个月随机试验的结果
背景:慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)显著影响患者的生活质量(QoL)。标准治疗包括鼻冲洗、鼻类固醇、全身皮质类固醇和功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)。单克隆抗体(生物药物)治疗不受控制的严重CRSwNP可获得更好的疾病控制,尽管一些残留症状可能持续存在。将生物疗法与FESS相结合,可能会更快、更持久地减轻残留症状。因此,我们的目的是比较FESS联合生物治疗与单独使用生物药物治疗严重CRSwNP患者的有效性。材料和方法:本随机对照试验(RCT)纳入58例CRSwNP和2型炎症患者,随机分为FESS组和非FESS组。所有患者每4周接受100 mg s.c. mepolizumab治疗,持续6个月。FESS组在第一次注射后2周进行手术。在基线和6个月后,使用鼻鼻结果测试-22 (SNOT-22)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、鼻塞评分(NCS)和气味识别测试(16支)对患者进行评估。临床评估采用鼻镜识别鼻息肉评分(NPS)。结果:治疗6个月后,两个治疗组的SNOT-22评分均有显著改善(p)。结论:与单纯美波珠单抗治疗相比,美波珠单抗治疗与FESS联合降低息肉负担时,大息肉评分患者的生活质量(SNOT-22)有显著改善,NPS、NCS和VAS CRS的降低幅度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy. International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Chronic Ambient Fine Particulate Matter and Recurrence Risk in Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma. Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 40-Item Smell Identification Test in People With Cystic Fibrosis. Burst Pressure and Fatigue Durability of Commercially Available Duraplasty Sealants. Allergic Rhinitis Amplifies Asthma Risk in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Large-Scale Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Cranial Nerve Injury in Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1