Intraperitoneal pressure measurements in children: a retrospective study.

Anne-Louise Sawaya, Ivan Damgov, Soraya Menouer, Joëlle Terzic, Claus Peter Schmitt, Ariane Zaloszyc
{"title":"Intraperitoneal pressure measurements in children: a retrospective study.","authors":"Anne-Louise Sawaya, Ivan Damgov, Soraya Menouer, Joëlle Terzic, Claus Peter Schmitt, Ariane Zaloszyc","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2025.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The peritoneal dialysis (PD) regimes should be individualized based on clinical tolerance and adequacy. Routine hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) measurements have been suggested to define optimal intraperitoneal dialysate volume (IPV), data on applicability and variability in clinical routine are few.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed 655 IPP measurements monthly performed in 21 children on stable automated PD. IPP was measured with the day-time dwell volume (IPV 606 ± 303 mL/m2) after two-hour dwell time (IPP1; n = 430), and again with the night-time dwell volume (IPV 958 ± 274 mL/m2) after 10 min dwell time (IPP2; n = 225), using bicarbonate (BPDF) and lactate buffered (LPDF) low GDP fluids and icodextrin fluid (IPDF), respectively. Findings were related to PD related complications and Kt/V.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean of all IPP measurements was 11.0 ± 2.6 cmH2O or 2.1 ± 0.8 cmH2O/100 mL/m2, with a mean IPV of 7.3 ± 3.4 mL/100 mL/m². Mean IPP1 was 10.3 ± 2.2 cmH2O, corresponding to 6.1 ± 3.1 mL/100 mL/m² IPV, IPP2 was 12.5 ± 2.5 cmH2O, corresponding to 9.6 ± 2.6 mL/100 mL/m² IPV (IPP1 vs IPP2 p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The values of IPP were acceptable in this pediatric population. IPP is relatively higher with higher fill volumes per BSA. Using single fill volume IPP measurements provides IPP with high intra- and interindividual variability. The relation to patient outcome is uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"21 1","pages":"13-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ndt.2025.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The peritoneal dialysis (PD) regimes should be individualized based on clinical tolerance and adequacy. Routine hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) measurements have been suggested to define optimal intraperitoneal dialysate volume (IPV), data on applicability and variability in clinical routine are few.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed 655 IPP measurements monthly performed in 21 children on stable automated PD. IPP was measured with the day-time dwell volume (IPV 606 ± 303 mL/m2) after two-hour dwell time (IPP1; n = 430), and again with the night-time dwell volume (IPV 958 ± 274 mL/m2) after 10 min dwell time (IPP2; n = 225), using bicarbonate (BPDF) and lactate buffered (LPDF) low GDP fluids and icodextrin fluid (IPDF), respectively. Findings were related to PD related complications and Kt/V.

Results: Mean of all IPP measurements was 11.0 ± 2.6 cmH2O or 2.1 ± 0.8 cmH2O/100 mL/m2, with a mean IPV of 7.3 ± 3.4 mL/100 mL/m². Mean IPP1 was 10.3 ± 2.2 cmH2O, corresponding to 6.1 ± 3.1 mL/100 mL/m² IPV, IPP2 was 12.5 ± 2.5 cmH2O, corresponding to 9.6 ± 2.6 mL/100 mL/m² IPV (IPP1 vs IPP2 p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The values of IPP were acceptable in this pediatric population. IPP is relatively higher with higher fill volumes per BSA. Using single fill volume IPP measurements provides IPP with high intra- and interindividual variability. The relation to patient outcome is uncertain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童腹腔内压力测量:一项回顾性研究。
背景:腹膜透析(PD)方案应根据临床耐受性和充分性进行个体化。常规腹膜静压(IPP)测量已被建议用于确定最佳腹膜透析液量(IPV),关于临床常规的适用性和可变性的数据很少。方法:我们回顾性分析了21例稳定的自动PD患儿每月655次IPP测量。IPP以停留2小时后的日间停留体积(IPV 606±303 mL/m2)测定(IPP1;n = 430),静置10 min后再次以夜间静置体积(IPV 958±274 mL/m2) (IPP2;n = 225),分别使用碳酸氢盐(BPDF)和乳酸缓冲(LPDF)低GDP液体和icodextrin液体(IPDF)。结果与PD相关并发症和Kt/V有关。结果:IPP平均值为11.0±2.6 cmH2O或2.1±0.8 cmH2O/ 100ml /m2, IPV平均值为7.3±3.4 mL/ 100ml /m2。平均IPP1为10.3±2.2 cmH2O,对应6.1±3.1 mL/100 mL/m²IPV, IPP2为12.5±2.5 cmH2O,对应9.6±2.6 mL/100 mL/m²IPV (IPP1 vs IPP2 p)。IPP相对较高,每个BSA的填充量也较高。使用单一填充体积IPP测量为IPP提供了高个体内和个体间的可变性。与患者预后的关系是不确定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Targeting complement in atypical hemolytic and uremic syndrome: development and current status of eculizumab and ravulizumab From a simple skin rash to kidney injury: A case of post-measles glomerulonephritis A cross-disciplinary perspective between nephrologists and urologists: Building bridges between specialties to optimize patient care Implementing systematic early protocol biopsies in routine practice: An exploratory real-world study. Effect of on-demand immunosuppressive therapy on long-term outcomes in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy: A real-world cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1