Secretoneurin Concentrations Measured with a High-Throughput Assay and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with Acute Dyspnea: Data from the Akershus Cardiac Examination 2 Study.

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1093/jalm/jfaf011
Helge Røsjø, Ilde Rugolo, Angelica Gjørven, Arne L Faaren, Frank Frantzen, Geir Christensen, Arne Didrik Høiseth, Anett H Ottesen, Rahul Bhatnagar, Magnus N Lyngbakken, Torbjørn Omland
{"title":"Secretoneurin Concentrations Measured with a High-Throughput Assay and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with Acute Dyspnea: Data from the Akershus Cardiac Examination 2 Study.","authors":"Helge Røsjø, Ilde Rugolo, Angelica Gjørven, Arne L Faaren, Frank Frantzen, Geir Christensen, Arne Didrik Høiseth, Anett H Ottesen, Rahul Bhatnagar, Magnus N Lyngbakken, Torbjørn Omland","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-throughput assays are required for novel biomarkers to have clinical potential. Secretoneurin (SN) is a candidate biomarker, and the performance of a new high-throughput SN assay is not known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured SN concentrations with a prototype chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) in 299 patients hospitalized with acute dyspnea. We compared the results with a CE-marked SN enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We adjudicated the cause of dyspnea as heart failure (HF) or non-HF, and we obtained information on all-cause mortality during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SN concentrations measured with CLIA and ELISA were closely correlated: rho = 0.81, P < 0.001. SN CLIA concentrations were higher in HF patients (n = 129) compared to patients with non-HF-related dyspnea (n = 170): median 51 (quartile 1-3 40-69) vs 41 (32-54) pmol/L, P < 0.001. The area under the curve (AUC) of SN CLIA to diagnose HF was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.71) and the AUC of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was 0.85 (0.81-0.89). During median 818 days follow-up, 110 patients died (37%). There was a nonlinear association between SN CLIA concentrations and mortality with optimal cutpoint 53 pmol/L. SN CLIA concentrations >53 pmol/L were associated with mortality after adjusting for clinical variables and NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin T concentrations: hazard ratio 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1-2.7), AUC 0.67 (0.61-0.74). We found similar results for SN ELISA for diagnosis and prognosis with AUC 0.63 (0.57-0.70) for the prediction of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high-throughput SN CLIA correlates with the SN ELISA and provides independent prognostic information over established biomarkers in patients with acute dyspnea.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-throughput assays are required for novel biomarkers to have clinical potential. Secretoneurin (SN) is a candidate biomarker, and the performance of a new high-throughput SN assay is not known.

Methods: We measured SN concentrations with a prototype chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) in 299 patients hospitalized with acute dyspnea. We compared the results with a CE-marked SN enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We adjudicated the cause of dyspnea as heart failure (HF) or non-HF, and we obtained information on all-cause mortality during follow-up.

Results: SN concentrations measured with CLIA and ELISA were closely correlated: rho = 0.81, P < 0.001. SN CLIA concentrations were higher in HF patients (n = 129) compared to patients with non-HF-related dyspnea (n = 170): median 51 (quartile 1-3 40-69) vs 41 (32-54) pmol/L, P < 0.001. The area under the curve (AUC) of SN CLIA to diagnose HF was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.71) and the AUC of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was 0.85 (0.81-0.89). During median 818 days follow-up, 110 patients died (37%). There was a nonlinear association between SN CLIA concentrations and mortality with optimal cutpoint 53 pmol/L. SN CLIA concentrations >53 pmol/L were associated with mortality after adjusting for clinical variables and NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin T concentrations: hazard ratio 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1-2.7), AUC 0.67 (0.61-0.74). We found similar results for SN ELISA for diagnosis and prognosis with AUC 0.63 (0.57-0.70) for the prediction of mortality.

Conclusion: The high-throughput SN CLIA correlates with the SN ELISA and provides independent prognostic information over established biomarkers in patients with acute dyspnea.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
期刊最新文献
Analytical Characterization and Validation of a Novel Automated Amino-Terminal proB-Type Natriuretic Peptide Assay. Secretoneurin Concentrations Measured with a High-Throughput Assay and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with Acute Dyspnea: Data from the Akershus Cardiac Examination 2 Study. Considerations for Building a Data Science Culture for the Clinical Laboratory. So I Guess I Am a Device? Making the Case for Professional Practice in the Context of the FDA's Final Rule on Laboratory-Developed Tests. Better Prediction of Clinical Outcome with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate by CKD-EPI 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1