{"title":"Unified finite element limit analysis for solid reinforced concrete structures","authors":"Peter Noe Poulsen, John Forbes Olesen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The application of Limit Analysis is effective in the pursuit of the collapse load of a structure. So far, whether it is an analytical model or a numerical model, the choice has been to apply either the lower or the upper bound theorem. Here, a unified approach for solid Finite Element models has eliminated this distinction and there is only one shared optimal solution. The unified solution is based on the two theorems by applying coinciding constitutive points for the fulfilment of the yield criteria together with weak forms of the equilibrium and the compatibility demands in the lower and upper bound formulation, respectively. This approach applies to any 3D stress state which may be formulated as a Semidefinite Program. Models based on either the lower or the upper bound theorem often give an indistinct result for the dual solution, interpreted as the displacements or the stresses, respectively. The present unified mixed solution renders accurate results for both stresses, displacements and load levels which in general are more accurate than the corresponding strict lower and upper bound solutions. A tetrahedral solid element with a linear stress variation and a quadratic displacement interpolation is presented along with a compatible embedded bar element. The effectiveness of this implementation is shown in three examples with regards to stresses, displacements, plastic work and the load capacity of reinforced concrete structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","volume":"314 ","pages":"Article 113307"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020768325000939","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The application of Limit Analysis is effective in the pursuit of the collapse load of a structure. So far, whether it is an analytical model or a numerical model, the choice has been to apply either the lower or the upper bound theorem. Here, a unified approach for solid Finite Element models has eliminated this distinction and there is only one shared optimal solution. The unified solution is based on the two theorems by applying coinciding constitutive points for the fulfilment of the yield criteria together with weak forms of the equilibrium and the compatibility demands in the lower and upper bound formulation, respectively. This approach applies to any 3D stress state which may be formulated as a Semidefinite Program. Models based on either the lower or the upper bound theorem often give an indistinct result for the dual solution, interpreted as the displacements or the stresses, respectively. The present unified mixed solution renders accurate results for both stresses, displacements and load levels which in general are more accurate than the corresponding strict lower and upper bound solutions. A tetrahedral solid element with a linear stress variation and a quadratic displacement interpolation is presented along with a compatible embedded bar element. The effectiveness of this implementation is shown in three examples with regards to stresses, displacements, plastic work and the load capacity of reinforced concrete structures.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Solids and Structures has as its objective the publication and dissemination of original research in Mechanics of Solids and Structures as a field of Applied Science and Engineering. It fosters thus the exchange of ideas among workers in different parts of the world and also among workers who emphasize different aspects of the foundations and applications of the field.
Standing as it does at the cross-roads of Materials Science, Life Sciences, Mathematics, Physics and Engineering Design, the Mechanics of Solids and Structures is experiencing considerable growth as a result of recent technological advances. The Journal, by providing an international medium of communication, is encouraging this growth and is encompassing all aspects of the field from the more classical problems of structural analysis to mechanics of solids continually interacting with other media and including fracture, flow, wave propagation, heat transfer, thermal effects in solids, optimum design methods, model analysis, structural topology and numerical techniques. Interest extends to both inorganic and organic solids and structures.