Acceptabilité d’un système logiciel robotique/cobot : une étude exploratoire en industrie

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.pto.2024.08.002
M. Boutrouille, C. Sagnier, É. Loup-Escande
{"title":"Acceptabilité d’un système logiciel robotique/cobot : une étude exploratoire en industrie","authors":"M. Boutrouille,&nbsp;C. Sagnier,&nbsp;É. Loup-Escande","doi":"10.1016/j.pto.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although the acceptability of industrial robots has been studied, the acceptability of robotic software, essential for robot operation, remains under-explored. This article examines the acceptability of robotic software in relation to a collaborative robot (cobot). Two versions of the software were tested by operators: one from a user-centered design (CCU robotic software prototype) and one not from a CCU (non-CCU robotic software prototype). The results show that the CCU/cobot software system has higher acceptability scores than the non-CCU/cobot software system. Furthermore, the acceptability of the software is closely linked to that of the cobot. These results indicate a reciprocal influence between software and cobot acceptability. Perspectives on situated acceptance are suggested.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43191,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 31-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1420253024000621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the acceptability of industrial robots has been studied, the acceptability of robotic software, essential for robot operation, remains under-explored. This article examines the acceptability of robotic software in relation to a collaborative robot (cobot). Two versions of the software were tested by operators: one from a user-centered design (CCU robotic software prototype) and one not from a CCU (non-CCU robotic software prototype). The results show that the CCU/cobot software system has higher acceptability scores than the non-CCU/cobot software system. Furthermore, the acceptability of the software is closely linked to that of the cobot. These results indicate a reciprocal influence between software and cobot acceptability. Perspectives on situated acceptance are suggested.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人/机器人软件系统的可接受性:行业探索性研究
虽然工业机器人的可接受性已经得到了研究,但机器人操作所必需的机器人软件的可接受性仍未得到充分探讨。本文研究了与协作机器人(cobot)相关的机器人软件的可接受性。操作员测试了两个版本的软件:一个来自以用户为中心的设计(CCU机器人软件原型),另一个来自CCU(非CCU机器人软件原型)。结果表明,CCU/cobot软件系统的可接受性得分高于非CCU/cobot软件系统。此外,软件的可接受性与协作机器人的可接受性密切相关。这些结果表明了软件和协作机器人可接受性之间的相互影响。提出了对处境接受的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Appel à publications – Numéro thématique pour la revue Psychologie du travail et des Organisations : « Évaluer la formation et ses effets : vers des pratiques et expériences renouvelées » Effets du harcèlement psychologique au travail sur la satisfaction de vie professionnelle et hors travail : le rôle des motivations à garder le silence et du bris du contrat psychologique La santé psychologique au travail chez les salariés Gabonais : rôles des stratégies de régulation émotionnelle et médiation par le soutien social au travail Construction et validation de l’Inventaire de la Qualité de Vie et des Conditions de Travail (I-QVCT)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1