{"title":"Damage assessment of ultra-high-performance concrete protective wall against gaseous explosion","authors":"Di Chen , Jun Li , Jian Liu , Chengqing Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) exhibits excellent mechanical strength and ductility, rendering it an ideal material for blast-resistant structures. This study focuses on the damage assessment of UHPC protective walls subjected to gaseous explosions, which differ from high explosive loads by having lower peak overpressures and longer durations. By combining advanced numerical modeling and machine learning techniques, the Karagozian & Case Concrete (KCC) material model was adapted to UHPC with a compressive strength of 160 MPa and validated against quasi-static and dynamic experimental results. Numerical structural analysis revealed that shock waves caused more severe damage than pressure waves for the same impulse, underscoring the importance of distinguishing between blast types in design. A parametric study examined the effects of wall thickness, height, and reinforcement ratios on pressure-impulse (P-I) diagrams, offering practical insights for optimizing UHPC blast-resistant wall designs. To address computational challenges, an artificial neural network (ANN) model was trained on 3044 numerical results to predict the dynamic response of UHPC structures, achieving high accuracy (<em>R</em>² = 0.989). This comprehensive methodology enables efficient evaluation and optimization of UHPC protective walls under gaseous explosions, supporting safer designs in high-risk industries handling flammable gases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 120071"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625004626","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) exhibits excellent mechanical strength and ductility, rendering it an ideal material for blast-resistant structures. This study focuses on the damage assessment of UHPC protective walls subjected to gaseous explosions, which differ from high explosive loads by having lower peak overpressures and longer durations. By combining advanced numerical modeling and machine learning techniques, the Karagozian & Case Concrete (KCC) material model was adapted to UHPC with a compressive strength of 160 MPa and validated against quasi-static and dynamic experimental results. Numerical structural analysis revealed that shock waves caused more severe damage than pressure waves for the same impulse, underscoring the importance of distinguishing between blast types in design. A parametric study examined the effects of wall thickness, height, and reinforcement ratios on pressure-impulse (P-I) diagrams, offering practical insights for optimizing UHPC blast-resistant wall designs. To address computational challenges, an artificial neural network (ANN) model was trained on 3044 numerical results to predict the dynamic response of UHPC structures, achieving high accuracy (R² = 0.989). This comprehensive methodology enables efficient evaluation and optimization of UHPC protective walls under gaseous explosions, supporting safer designs in high-risk industries handling flammable gases.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.