Soil organic carbon measurements influence FT-NIR model training in calcareous soils of Saskatchewan

Gbenga Adejumo, David Bulmer, Preston Sorenson, Derek Peak
{"title":"Soil organic carbon measurements influence FT-NIR model training in calcareous soils of Saskatchewan","authors":"Gbenga Adejumo,&nbsp;David Bulmer,&nbsp;Preston Sorenson,&nbsp;Derek Peak","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study compares acid digestion and temperature ramping methods for obtaining soil organic carbon (SOC) reference data to train Fourier transform near infrared (FT-NIR) models in carbonate-rich Saskatchewan agricultural soils. FT-NIR spectra were measured on soil samples (<i>n =</i> 431) from carbonate-rich Dark Brown Chernozem soil, with quantification of inorganic and organic carbon. Spectra were transformed using continuous wavelet transform and analyzed using cubist regression tree models. Models were built using a 70:30 train test split validation approach. Spectral feature selection, wavelet scale, and model and hyperparameter optimization were conducted using fivefold cross-validation analysis on the training dataset. All validation metrics were calculated using the testing dataset. The temperature ramping method identified outliers with soil inorganic carbon (SIC) greater than 1.5%, which were not detected using the acid digestion method. SOC and SIC prediction accuracy was higher using temperature ramping data (coefficient of determination: <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.66 and 0.63, Lin's concordance: ccc = 0.78 and 0.77) compared to acid digestion data (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.44 and 0.42, ccc = 0.64 and 0.62). Total carbon (TC) prediction accuracy was similar for both methods (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.58, ccc = 0.71). Removing samples with high carbonate (SIC &gt; 1.5%) improved SOC and TC prediction accuracy using temperature ramping data (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.70, ccc = 0.81 for SOC; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.64, ccc = 0.75 for TC) but not when using acid digestion method. This study suggests that high carbonate content may negatively affects SOC model accuracy, especially when relying upon acid digestion methods for reference SOC data.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares acid digestion and temperature ramping methods for obtaining soil organic carbon (SOC) reference data to train Fourier transform near infrared (FT-NIR) models in carbonate-rich Saskatchewan agricultural soils. FT-NIR spectra were measured on soil samples (n = 431) from carbonate-rich Dark Brown Chernozem soil, with quantification of inorganic and organic carbon. Spectra were transformed using continuous wavelet transform and analyzed using cubist regression tree models. Models were built using a 70:30 train test split validation approach. Spectral feature selection, wavelet scale, and model and hyperparameter optimization were conducted using fivefold cross-validation analysis on the training dataset. All validation metrics were calculated using the testing dataset. The temperature ramping method identified outliers with soil inorganic carbon (SIC) greater than 1.5%, which were not detected using the acid digestion method. SOC and SIC prediction accuracy was higher using temperature ramping data (coefficient of determination: R2 = 0.66 and 0.63, Lin's concordance: ccc = 0.78 and 0.77) compared to acid digestion data (R2 = 0.44 and 0.42, ccc = 0.64 and 0.62). Total carbon (TC) prediction accuracy was similar for both methods (R2 = 0.58, ccc = 0.71). Removing samples with high carbonate (SIC > 1.5%) improved SOC and TC prediction accuracy using temperature ramping data (R2 = 0.70, ccc = 0.81 for SOC; R2 = 0.64, ccc = 0.75 for TC) but not when using acid digestion method. This study suggests that high carbonate content may negatively affects SOC model accuracy, especially when relying upon acid digestion methods for reference SOC data.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土壤有机碳测量对萨斯喀彻温钙质土壤FT-NIR模型训练的影响
在萨斯喀彻温省富含碳酸盐的农业土壤中,比较了酸消化和升温两种获取土壤有机碳(SOC)参考数据的方法,以训练傅里叶变换近红外(FT-NIR)模型。对431个富含碳酸盐的黑钙土样品(n = 431)进行了FT-NIR光谱测定,并定量了无机碳和有机碳。采用连续小波变换对光谱进行变换,并采用立体回归树模型进行分析。使用70:30训练测试分割验证方法建立模型。利用五重交叉验证分析对训练数据集进行光谱特征选择、小波尺度、模型和超参数优化。使用测试数据集计算所有验证度量。升温法检测出土壤无机碳(SIC)含量大于1.5%的异常值,酸消化法检测不到。温度梯度数据的SOC和SIC预测精度(决定系数R2 = 0.66和0.63,Lin’s一致性ccc = 0.78和0.77)高于酸消化数据(R2 = 0.44和0.42,ccc = 0.64和0.62)。两种方法预测总碳(TC)的准确度相近(R2 = 0.58, ccc = 0.71)。去除高碳酸盐(SIC >;1.5%)利用温度升温数据提高SOC和TC的预测精度(SOC的R2 = 0.70, ccc = 0.81;酸消化法R2 = 0.64, ccc = 0.75),酸消化法无明显差异。该研究表明,高碳酸盐含量可能会对碳含量模型的准确性产生负面影响,特别是当依赖酸消化方法作为参考碳含量数据时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxidation dynamics and leaching behavior of elemental sulfur fertilizers in tropical soils with contrasting textures Interactive effects of no-till, cereal rye, and softwood pine-derived biochar on soil health of a no-till northern soybean system Lignin-based amendments improve wheat growth and water use efficiency in acidic soils under deficit irrigation Effects of eucalyptus thinning on soil chemical attributes in an unfertilized silvopastoral system 6 years after thinning Repeated use of anion-exchange membranes in soils alters the membrane surface and phosphate-P exchange capacity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1