Empowering a Disabled Identity: An Examination of Goals and Antecedents of Autism Activism on Twitter

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1002/casp.70078
Nicole M. Satterlund, Anca M. Miron, Zulan D. Pino
{"title":"Empowering a Disabled Identity: An Examination of Goals and Antecedents of Autism Activism on Twitter","authors":"Nicole M. Satterlund,&nbsp;Anca M. Miron,&nbsp;Zulan D. Pino","doi":"10.1002/casp.70078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Online activism is an emergent form of collective action. We examined collective action strategies employed by neurodiversity activists on Twitter (now known as X) to create counternarratives to mainstream narratives that frame autism as a deficit. Tweets from #ActuallyAutistic and #Autism—two hashtags with differing narratives about autism—were coded for goals of collective action (information dissemination, influence, support giving and experience sharing) and antecedents of collective action (social identity, injustice, positive efficacy and negative efficacy). #ActuallyAutistic tweets featured more instances of social identity, negative efficacy and information dissemination themes than #Autism tweets, whereas #Autism tweets included more instances of support giving themes. Regression analyses indicate that, among #ActuallyAutistic tweets, experience sharing was positively predicted by the presence of user's self-efficacy themes but negatively predicted by themes of identity and injustice. Injustice predicted information dissemination themes, whereas social identity predicted support giving/seeking themes. Among #Autism tweets, only perceived injustice predicted information dissemination themes. We discuss implications for understanding how the autistic community uses online networks and narratives for empowerment, social change and collective action. Please refer to the Supporting Information section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.70078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online activism is an emergent form of collective action. We examined collective action strategies employed by neurodiversity activists on Twitter (now known as X) to create counternarratives to mainstream narratives that frame autism as a deficit. Tweets from #ActuallyAutistic and #Autism—two hashtags with differing narratives about autism—were coded for goals of collective action (information dissemination, influence, support giving and experience sharing) and antecedents of collective action (social identity, injustice, positive efficacy and negative efficacy). #ActuallyAutistic tweets featured more instances of social identity, negative efficacy and information dissemination themes than #Autism tweets, whereas #Autism tweets included more instances of support giving themes. Regression analyses indicate that, among #ActuallyAutistic tweets, experience sharing was positively predicted by the presence of user's self-efficacy themes but negatively predicted by themes of identity and injustice. Injustice predicted information dissemination themes, whereas social identity predicted support giving/seeking themes. Among #Autism tweets, only perceived injustice predicted information dissemination themes. We discuss implications for understanding how the autistic community uses online networks and narratives for empowerment, social change and collective action. Please refer to the Supporting Information section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赋予残疾人身份:对Twitter上自闭症行动主义的目标和前因的考察
网络行动主义是一种新兴的集体行动形式。我们研究了Twitter上神经多样性活动人士(现在被称为X)采用的集体行动策略,以创建反叙事,反驳将自闭症视为缺陷的主流叙事。来自# actuallyautism和# autism这两个标签的推文——对自闭症有不同的描述——被编码为集体行动的目标(信息传播、影响、支持和经验分享)和集体行动的前提(社会认同、不公正、积极效果和消极效果)。与#自闭症推文相比,# actuallyautism推文有更多关于社会认同、消极效能和信息传播主题的例子,而#自闭症推文则有更多关于给予支持主题的例子。回归分析表明,在# actuallyautism推文中,用户自我效能主题的存在正向预测体验分享,而身份和不公正主题的存在负向预测体验分享。不公正预测信息传播主题,而社会认同预测给予/寻求支持主题。在#自闭症推文中,只有感知到的不公正能预测信息传播主题。我们讨论了理解自闭症社区如何使用在线网络和叙事来赋予权力,社会变革和集体行动的含义。请参阅支持信息部分以查找本文的社区和社会影响声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology publishes papers regarding social behaviour in relation to community problems and strengths. The journal is international in scope, reflecting the common concerns of scholars and community practitioners in Europe and worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Village Identification, Village Support and Collective Efficacy Among People Living in Poverty in Nepal Societal Threats and Immigrant Discrimination: The Role of Social Dominance Orientation and Essentialism ‘It's Very Hard to Feel Accepted When a Whole Country Screams That They Don't Want You Here’: Minorities' Experiences of the UK 2024 Summer Riots From Critique to Construction: The Ancestral Institute as a Praxis-Based Model for Decolonial Community Psychology Understanding the 2024 Summer Riots in the UK: Three Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1