Enablers and Barriers to an Experience-Based Co-Design Process to Develop Service Improvements in Enhanced Community Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1111/hex.70206
Fay O'Donoghue, Máire T O'Donnell, Tomás P. Griffin, Eileen Fahy, Elaine Newell, Ann-Marie Creaven
{"title":"Enablers and Barriers to an Experience-Based Co-Design Process to Develop Service Improvements in Enhanced Community Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Fay O'Donoghue,&nbsp;Máire T O'Donnell,&nbsp;Tomás P. Griffin,&nbsp;Eileen Fahy,&nbsp;Elaine Newell,&nbsp;Ann-Marie Creaven","doi":"10.1111/hex.70206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD) is a popular collaborative process where service users and healthcare providers share their experiences of using and delivering services to identify ways to adapt services to enhance those experiences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to identify enablers and barriers to the successful implementation of EBCD as part of Ireland's recently adopted Enhanced Community Care (ECC) programme.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Service users and staff at two sites (<i>N</i> = 17) participated in an accelerated EBCD process designed to enhance service provision for older people and those living with chronic conditions. This included four co-design working group sessions per site.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Transcripts from the co-design working groups and from brief follow-up interviews with individual participants were analysed. Thematic analysis was used to identify enablers and barriers to the EBCD process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We generated six key themes reflecting barriers and enablers; enablers were <i>the fundamental role of the facilitator</i> (Theme 1), <i>a flexible approach that met group members' needs</i> (Theme 2) and <i>active and interactive activities to support participant engagement</i> (Theme 3). The <i>fundamental role of the facilitator</i> was also identified as a barrier (Theme 4); additional barriers included <i>balancing experience-sharing and decompressing</i> (Theme 5) and <i>the scope of the group as an invisible barrier</i> (Theme 6), which reflected challenges in facilitating dialogue about change when participants were aware of system-level constraints on the potential for change.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The facilitator is critical in ensuring the successful implementation of the EBCD process. Considering how best to draw on the facilitator strengths while also ensuring that the service user perspectives are equally weighted with staff perspectives is important for effective communication within EBCD projects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Service users (also including carers) at two sites participated in EBCD projects alongside health and social care professionals, ultimately generating two service improvements for the ECC programme. The participation of these service users was celebrated at an academic conference, which was attended by a number of service users, and where the outcomes of the EBCD project were presented.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70206","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD) is a popular collaborative process where service users and healthcare providers share their experiences of using and delivering services to identify ways to adapt services to enhance those experiences.

Objective

This study aimed to identify enablers and barriers to the successful implementation of EBCD as part of Ireland's recently adopted Enhanced Community Care (ECC) programme.

Design

Service users and staff at two sites (N = 17) participated in an accelerated EBCD process designed to enhance service provision for older people and those living with chronic conditions. This included four co-design working group sessions per site.

Methods

Transcripts from the co-design working groups and from brief follow-up interviews with individual participants were analysed. Thematic analysis was used to identify enablers and barriers to the EBCD process.

Results

We generated six key themes reflecting barriers and enablers; enablers were the fundamental role of the facilitator (Theme 1), a flexible approach that met group members' needs (Theme 2) and active and interactive activities to support participant engagement (Theme 3). The fundamental role of the facilitator was also identified as a barrier (Theme 4); additional barriers included balancing experience-sharing and decompressing (Theme 5) and the scope of the group as an invisible barrier (Theme 6), which reflected challenges in facilitating dialogue about change when participants were aware of system-level constraints on the potential for change.

Conclusions

The facilitator is critical in ensuring the successful implementation of the EBCD process. Considering how best to draw on the facilitator strengths while also ensuring that the service user perspectives are equally weighted with staff perspectives is important for effective communication within EBCD projects.

Patient or Public Contribution

Service users (also including carers) at two sites participated in EBCD projects alongside health and social care professionals, ultimately generating two service improvements for the ECC programme. The participation of these service users was celebrated at an academic conference, which was attended by a number of service users, and where the outcomes of the EBCD project were presented.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
Co-Authoring and Reporting on Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and/or Substance Research: A Qualitative Study and Guidance Document Enablers and Barriers to an Experience-Based Co-Design Process to Develop Service Improvements in Enhanced Community Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study Announcements of Death During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study of Family Experiences Coproducing an Ecological Momentary Assessment Measurement Burst Mental Health Study With Young People: The MHIM Coproduction Protocol How Has ‘What Matters to You’ Been Used for Patient Care? A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1