IL-23p19 Antagonists vs. Ustekinumab for Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY American Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000003406
Claudia Dziegielewski, Yuhong Yuan, Christopher Ma, Brigid S Boland, John T Chang, Gaurav Syal, Sudheer Kumar Vuyyuru, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Vipul Jairath, Siddharth Singh
{"title":"IL-23p19 Antagonists vs. Ustekinumab for Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Claudia Dziegielewski, Yuhong Yuan, Christopher Ma, Brigid S Boland, John T Chang, Gaurav Syal, Sudheer Kumar Vuyyuru, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Vipul Jairath, Siddharth Singh","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interleukin (IL)-23p19 antagonists with ustekinumab, stratified by prior biologic exposure, in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a systematic review through August 17, 2024, we identified phase 2 and 3 RCTs comparing IL-23p19 antagonists vs. ustekinumab in adults with moderate-to-severe CD. Primary outcome was achieving clinical remission at ∼1y, and secondary outcomes were achieving endoscopic remission and serious adverse events. We performed subgroup analyses based on prior exposure to biologic therapy, primarily TNF antagonists. Certainty of evidence was appraised using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included five head-to-head RCTs with a treat-through design (n=2506), of which one was conducted exclusively in patients with prior TNF antagonist exposure. On meta-analysis, patients treated with IL-23p19 inhibitors may be more likely to achieve clinical remission (relative risk [RR], 1.18 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.36]) [low certainty of evidence] and endoscopic remission (RR, 1.53 [1.07-2.20]) compared with ustekinumab. On subgroup analysis, IL-23p19 antagonists are probably more efficacious than ustekinumab in patients with prior biologic exposure (clinical remission: RR, 1.31 [1.16-1.48]; endoscopic remission: RR, 1.61 [1.27-2.05]) [moderate to high certainty], but not in biologic-naïve patients (clinical remission: RR, 0.99 [0.90-1.08]; endoscopic remission: RR, 1.16 [0.82-1.65]). IL-23p19 antagonists may be associated with a lower risk of serious adverse events as compared with ustekinumab (RR, 0.79 [0.61-1.02]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IL-23p19 antagonists are probably more efficacious and safer than ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe CD in patients with prior biologic exposure, but not in biologic-naïve patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003406","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interleukin (IL)-23p19 antagonists with ustekinumab, stratified by prior biologic exposure, in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD).

Methods: Through a systematic review through August 17, 2024, we identified phase 2 and 3 RCTs comparing IL-23p19 antagonists vs. ustekinumab in adults with moderate-to-severe CD. Primary outcome was achieving clinical remission at ∼1y, and secondary outcomes were achieving endoscopic remission and serious adverse events. We performed subgroup analyses based on prior exposure to biologic therapy, primarily TNF antagonists. Certainty of evidence was appraised using the GRADE approach.

Results: We included five head-to-head RCTs with a treat-through design (n=2506), of which one was conducted exclusively in patients with prior TNF antagonist exposure. On meta-analysis, patients treated with IL-23p19 inhibitors may be more likely to achieve clinical remission (relative risk [RR], 1.18 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.36]) [low certainty of evidence] and endoscopic remission (RR, 1.53 [1.07-2.20]) compared with ustekinumab. On subgroup analysis, IL-23p19 antagonists are probably more efficacious than ustekinumab in patients with prior biologic exposure (clinical remission: RR, 1.31 [1.16-1.48]; endoscopic remission: RR, 1.61 [1.27-2.05]) [moderate to high certainty], but not in biologic-naïve patients (clinical remission: RR, 0.99 [0.90-1.08]; endoscopic remission: RR, 1.16 [0.82-1.65]). IL-23p19 antagonists may be associated with a lower risk of serious adverse events as compared with ustekinumab (RR, 0.79 [0.61-1.02]).

Conclusions: IL-23p19 antagonists are probably more efficacious and safer than ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe CD in patients with prior biologic exposure, but not in biologic-naïve patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗克罗恩病的 IL-23p19 拮抗剂与 Ustekinumab:随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
期刊最新文献
A Rare Tumor of the Esophagus: Primary Malignant Melanoma. Endoscopic diagnosis of gastropericardial fistula caused by intrathoracic gastric ulcer. Utility of the ESPGHAN Biopsy Sparing Guidelines for Celiac Disease in Children. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreaticogastrostomy Using a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent: A Simplified, Alternative Approach. IL-23p19 Antagonists vs. Ustekinumab for Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1